2017年度-若手研究B-研究計画調書

Transcript

1. ï׽ࣈ౳ð ݚڀ୅දऀ ॴଐݚڀػؔ ฏ੒ùĀ೥౓ ïù÷øþ೥౓ð एखݚڀʢ̗ʣçݚڀܭըௐॻ øø ùÿ çù ೥ ೔ ݄ ôçøçô ژ౎େֶ ෦ɹہ ܦӦ؅ཧେֶӃ ৬ ïϑϦΨφð ϠϚϞτçϢ΢εέ ಛఆߨࢣ ݚڀ՝୊໊ ৘ใਫ਼ࠪ΁ͷಈػ͚ͮΛߦ͏৘ใݕࡧΠϯλϥΫγϣϯʹؔ͢Δݚڀ ࢁຊç༞ี ࢯ໊ ೥౓ ઃඋඋ඼අ ফ໣඼අ ݚڀܦඅ çʢઍԁʣ ཱྀඅ ͦͷଞ ࢖༻಺༁ʢઍԁʣ ૯ܭ ݚçڀçܦçඅ ઍԁະຬͷ ୺਺͸੾Γ ࣺͯΔ ৽ن ฏ੒ùĀ೥౓ ฏ੒ú÷೥౓ ฏ੒úø೥౓ ฏ੒ ççççùóĀþĀ ççççøóĀÿĀ çççççççç÷ ççççûóĀýÿ ççççççĀ÷÷ ççççççøĀ÷ ççççøóøþÿ ççççøóþýû ççççççĀúý ççççççĀ÷÷ çççççççç÷ çççççççç÷ ççççççøû÷ çççççççü÷ çççççççç÷ ççççççüÿĀ ççççççüÿĀ çççççççç÷ ççççççÿÿù ççççççÿÿù çççççççç÷ ççççççûýÿ ççççççûýÿ çççççççç÷ ݚڀछ໨ एखݚڀïĉð ෼ɹ໺ ࡉɹ໨ ৘ใֶ ਤॻؗ৘ใֶɾਓจࣾձ৘ใֶ ։ࣔر๬ͷ༗ແ ৹ࠪ݁Ռͷ։ࣔΛر๬͢Δ çø൛ ࡉ໨ද Ωʔϫʔυ ࡉ໨දҎ֎ͷ Ωʔϫʔυ ৘ใݕࡧ ৘ใͷ৴ጪੑɺ৘ใϦςϥγʔɺďĊĐ ೥ྸ ïďùĀõûõøݱࡏð çúû ࡀ ʢ̨ɽüþ೥÷Ā݄ੜ·Εʣ ݱࡏͷઐ໳ ֶɹҐ ത࢜ʢ৘ใֶʣ ৘ใݕࡧɺ৘ใͷ৴ጪੑɺଶ౓ม༰ ŚŲőŖŪ ú÷ˋ ÷÷ûü øûú÷ø ĀĀĀĀ øú ੔ཧ൪߸ ࡉ໨൪߸ ෼ׂ൪߸ ػؔ൪߸ ݚڀछ໨൪߸ ৹ࠪ۠෼൪߸ ʵ ฏ੒úù೥౓ çççççççç÷ çççççççç÷ çççççççç÷ çççççççç÷ çççççççç÷ çççççççç÷ ਓ݅අ ँۚ ɾ ෳ߹ྖҬ ৘ใֶϑϩϯςΟΞ σβΠϯֶ ෼ɹՊ σβΠϯֶ ৘ใσβΠϯʢίϛϡχέʔγϣϯɺϝ σΟΞ৘ใɺίϯςϯπɺΠϯλϥΫγ ϣϯɺΠϯλϑΣΠεʣ
2. 5 5 5 5 5 5 A D N 5 A D 66 0 5 N 5 D 1 2 D a e e a c GIzSEQ/c c a Silence f 50% f z BE. Sillence et al. CHI 2004C SNS BS.Nakamura et al. ECDL2007CBM.Morris et al. CHI 2010C e f l a a B 11,12,13,14C w BX.Dong et al., VLDB 2015C . [ 8, 9] a [ 1, 2] e 2 3
3. c GI0byƒwo|u.kyq~ivrzkc a b o o • • e u 1. T5…†ˆ–‰kz:$]zZvrŒŽ‹‡z) : a o y 2. &`x"K3%ƒ]r‘“„’ ;zWU a a l B: 2DSJ : SPD I HST PD U DPG F D T F J //,C a 3. K3ƒr"4L„”Š†–‰z4V o a a l X ayjn1GIzSEx=R•? Ex<{
   #p‚M2v$O a / s • e • e e a o a
4. 5 5 5 5 A D 6 5 5 5 5 5 A D 6 0 5 1 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 × D 9 5 × 9 5 5 A 5 A D 6 a s u 3 1. a 2. 3. a w ' 29 zUC c 1. T5…†ˆ–‰kz:$]ZŒŽ‹‡z) a a u : X X [ 8, 9] a ( a a a 42 2. &`x"K3%ƒ]r‘“„’ ;zWU a ] B i ( C 2 e : g :
5. : : ' 30 zUC 3. &`x"K3ƒr"4L„”Š†–‰zWU (1) a a (2) UI (1) a o [ 1, 2] a DB a UI a UI UI (2) : → e g UI ) UI (1) (2) UI a l w m o UI w GIl UCwj€y_|xhvmz! a f z UI UI UI g : g
6. 5 5 5 A D 6 0 5 1 5 5 2 d1GIƒ-rs}yBrGI-W•W•GI[+Jg@zGIAz>8 eGIPvz^NY*z>8xwgGIF(yntz>8 f1GIzGI'2ƒH•7yDr,9J Facebook z x 93 h 5 D N A D 6 5 N 5 A D 6 GI6 2015 4 r 1 HT2016 2012 3 2015 3 . URA ICT 2011 4 2012 2 1 2011 6 2012 2 CHI2011 WWW WWW2012 \6 ) 1 1 ( ) 1 AHE ( ( 2HTU DRHS 1WDSG 6 STU PPHS R ( ( AHE42 6 S ( ( AHE42 6 S ( . ( . ( . 9 1 % ( .
7. 5 5 5 5 5 5 D 5 5 A D 6 5 5 6 5 5 % % A D 6 9N A 6 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 A D 6 1 D 5 6 5 5 5 D 4 6 5 A D 6 % ) 1. l Vol. 32, No.1, pp.1-12, 2017 . 2. Y. Yamamoto and S. Shimada: “Can Disputed Topic Suggestion Enhance User Consideration of Information Credibility in Web Search?”, Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT 2016), pp.169-177, 2016, % . 3. Y. Yamamoto, K. Imai, and T. Tsugehara: “Who Search for Research Grant for What and When?”, Information Engineering Express, Vol.2, No.1, pp.11-21, 2016, . 4. X. Xiao, Y. Yamamoto, M. P. Kato and K. Tanaka: “Predicting between - subject variability of brain activities based on brain structure”, DEIM Forum 2016 . % ( 5. Y. Yamamoto and M.Kato: “Cognition-aware Information Access System based on Brain Activity”, Korea-Japan Database Workshop 2015 (KJDB 2015), Okinawa, Japan, 2015, 6. Y. Yamamoto, K. Imai, and T. Tsugehara: “Can We Understand Researcher Grant Needs Without Direct Communication?”, Proceedings of 4th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI 2015), pp.462-467, 2015, % 7. g 0 1 , 1 2014.
8. % 8. TOD57 Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 42-50, 2013, % % 9. Y. Yamamoto: "Disputed sentence suggestion towards credibility-oriented Web search", Proceedings of the 14th Asia-Pacific Web Conference (APWeb 2012), pp.34-45, 2012, ( 24%), Best Paper Award First Runner-up. 10. Pern Hui Chia, Y. Yamamoto and N. Asokan: “Is this App Safe? A Large Scale Study on Application Permissions and Risk Signals”, Proceedings of the 21th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2012), pp.311-320, 2012,
    ( 12%) 11. 0 m 0 m Vol.66, No.11, pp.891-895, 2012 % 12. Y. Yamamoto and K. Tanaka: "Enhancing Credibility Judgment of Web Search Results", Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI 2011), 19% pp.1235-1244, 2011. 13. Y. Yamamoto and K. Tanaka: "ImageAlert: Credibility Analysis of Text-Image Pairs on the Web", Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium On Applied Computing (SAC 2011), 30% , pp.1724-1731, 2011 . 14. AHE w 0 (TOD46), Vol. 3, No.2, pp.61-79, 2010
9. 5 5 5 5 A D 6 5 9 5 D A D 6
10. 5 N 5 5 5 A 5 A D 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 A D 6 o w [ a r r 5 5 5 A D 6 5 5 5 5 5 9 5 A D 6 l p ( p AHE 1 D P 53( a w 3 ) p ) x ( 839 13 979 389 x p d / p (
11. N 5 A D 6 N 5 A D 6 . 3 1RR H DF2 M S 9PUH 3 SH - ( 78 ,72 (72 ) p ) / / S TH HJDT T( ( , 2 2( 194 3 2 3 2 /
12. N 5 A D 6 ( p ) 1 7 97 A9( ( ). p ) ( p ) 1 7 97 A9( ( ). p ) - ./ - ./ t x 0 13 389 ( . S 979 ( . t x 0 13 389 ( / S 979 ( / 1 k w ( p ( n o p ( k ) w ( p ( ( p 1 k w ( p ( n o p ( k ) w ( p ( ( p (.. ( ( ..( (.. ( ( ..( x 1 7 97 A9( x 13 389 S 979 1 D P 53( DSJH HDS x 1 7 97 A9( x 13 389 S 979 1 D P 53( DSJH HDS (, ,) ,. (, ,) ,.
13. % 5 × A D 6 , 5 5