Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

HCI Capstone Project 2013

Shaun Kelly
April 13, 2013

HCI Capstone Project 2013

The slides for my MS HCI capstone project.

Shaun Kelly

April 13, 2013
Tweet

Other Decks in Design

Transcript

  1. “I want to have a nice yard; I just don’t

    want to spend all my time on it. It’s not my first priority.” - P1 (Female, 31) Flickr user gatesofmemphis
  2. Current Sources • Home improvement store employees • Internet searches,

    blogs • Magazines (Southern Living, Martha Stewart) • Gardening books • Local newspaper columns
  3. “I planted azaleas, but I put them in too late

    and they burned up in the sun.” - P2 (Male, 33) Flickr user martinlabar
  4. • Determine suitable plants for user location • Automatically identify

    tasks based on context • Design layout for the yard Tasks
  5. Design Space • Don’t overwhelm with info and tasks •

    Consistency to increase learnability • Interaction of layout screens
  6. Home Yard Layout/To Do Add Structure Add Plant Get Recommendation

    Search List Filter Plant Page To Do List Manual Add Mark Complete Shopping List Manual Add Add From Task/ Plant Page Manual Configuration: Location Develop Initial Flow
  7. Goal • Rich interactions • [T]he main drawback of conventional

    sketching has to do with its limitations in capturing time, dynamics, phrasing - the temporal things that lie at the heart of experience. (Buxton, 2007) • Test on tablet
  8. Mixed Fidelity • [-] Visual • [+] Breadth of functionality

    • [+] Depth of functionality • [+] Richness of interactivity • [-] Richness of data-model • (McMurdy et al., 2006)
  9. Tasks 1. Check weather 2. Check to dos 3. Add

    to do 4. Delete to do 5. Mark to do complete 6. Add planter to yard 7. Find plants by least effort 8. Add plant 9. Are begonias recommended 10.Check shopping list 11. Add item to shopping list
  10. Quantitative • Performance • Task completion (binary) • Number of

    errors • Satisfaction • Systems Usability Scale (Sauro and Lewis, 2012)
  11. Task Completion 0 1 2 3 4 T1 T2 T3

    T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 Number of Users Completing Task Percent of Users Task
  12. Errors per Task 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    7 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 Errors per Task by Participant Errors P1 P2 P3 P4
  13. SUS Participant Score P1 72.5 P2 87.5 P3 35 P4

    82.5 68 is average and the top 10% of applications score above 80.3 (Sauro and Lewis, 2012)
  14. Issues Issue Severity Principle Task 1 Home page: Not obvious

    that you can view weather 3 Visibility Task 3 Calendar page: Users clicked on date to add new item to date 2 Conceptual model, Affordances Calendar obscured by modal dialog for adding new to do item 1 Visibility Task 5: Calendar page and home page: Users click only on check mark to mark item complete when whole item is touch target 3 Affordances Task 6: Landscape page: Users attempted to touch and place before attempting to drag and drop 1 Conceptual model, Affordances Task 7: Plant page: Not clear if effort means least amount of work 2 Conceptual model Not clear if sort by most or least effort 2 Visibility Task 9 Plant page: Not clear what recommended heading means 2 Conceptual model Overall: Not clear that clear that tasks are inferred by items added 2 Conceptual model
  15. “It had that pinwheel thing that looks like settings. There

    wasn’t anything else that looked like it might have been weather.” P4 (Female 25)
  16. “Clicking didn’t do it, so I dragged... I assumed after

    I clicked it, it would highlight so I could see which one I selected and then touch on the screen where I want to put it.” P1 (Male 33)
  17. “Did I put all these todos in or did you

    infer them for me?” P2 (Female, 31)