Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Laws of motion
Search
Lindsay Holmwood
April 05, 2017
Technology
1
190
Laws of motion
Overcoming the challenges of digital transformation in your organisation.
Lindsay Holmwood
April 05, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Lindsay Holmwood
See All by Lindsay Holmwood
Protecting sensitive data in DynamoDB with searchable encryption
auxesis
0
25
Your API ain't as secure as you think
auxesis
0
170
Footguns and factorisation: how to make users of your cryptographic library successful
auxesis
0
1.5k
Levelling up database security by thinking in APIs
auxesis
0
170
How to thwart your devops transformation with counterinsurgency doctrine
auxesis
1
110
Microservices are an antipattern
auxesis
0
240
Mirrors, networks, and boundaries
auxesis
0
160
Managing remotely, while remotely managing
auxesis
13
4.7k
Testing Conway’s Law in open source communities
auxesis
6
860
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
"作る"から"使われる"へ:Backstage 活用の現在地
sbtechnight
0
230
形式手法特論:SMT ソルバで解く認可ポリシの静的解析 #kernelvm / Kernel VM Study Tsukuba No3
ytaka23
1
690
システム標準化PMOから ガバメントクラウドCoEへ
techniczna
1
150
NewSQL_ ストレージ分離と分散合意を用いたスケーラブルアーキテクチャ
hacomono
PRO
4
420
1GB RAMのラズピッピで何ができるのか試してみよう / 20260319-rpijam-1gb-rpi-whats-possible
akkiesoft
0
650
Phase05_ClaudeCode入門
overflowinc
0
280
めちゃくちゃ開発するQAエンジニアになって感じたメリットとこれからの課題感
ryuhei0000yamamoto
0
210
頼れる Agentic AI を支える Datadog のオブザーバビリティ / Powering Reliable Agentic AI with Datadog Observability
aoto
PRO
0
240
SLI/SLO 導入で 避けるべきこと3選
yagikota
0
140
中央集権型を脱却した話 分散型をやめて、連邦型にたどり着くまで
sansantech
PRO
1
160
Phase10_組織浸透_データ活用
overflowinc
0
220
WebアクセシビリティをCI/CDで担保する ― axe DevTools × Playwright C#実践ガイド
tomokusaba
2
200
Featured
See All Featured
Self-Hosted WebAssembly Runtime for Runtime-Neutral Checkpoint/Restore in Edge–Cloud Continuum
chikuwait
0
410
世界の人気アプリ100個を分析して見えたペイウォール設計の心得
akihiro_kokubo
PRO
68
37k
XXLCSS - How to scale CSS and keep your sanity
sugarenia
249
1.3M
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
432
66k
Helping Users Find Their Own Way: Creating Modern Search Experiences
danielanewman
31
3.1k
Unlocking the hidden potential of vector embeddings in international SEO
frankvandijk
0
210
Product Roadmaps are Hard
iamctodd
PRO
55
12k
DBのスキルで生き残る技術 - AI時代におけるテーブル設計の勘所
soudai
PRO
64
52k
Future Trends and Review - Lecture 12 - Web Technologies (1019888BNR)
signer
PRO
0
3.3k
SERP Conf. Vienna - Web Accessibility: Optimizing for Inclusivity and SEO
sarafernandez
1
1.3k
Learning to Love Humans: Emotional Interface Design
aarron
275
41k
AI in Enterprises - Java and Open Source to the Rescue
ivargrimstad
0
1.2k
Transcript
Laws of motion Overcoming the challenges of digital transformation in
your organisation Lindsay Holmwood
1. Where are we now? 2. Where do we want
to be? 3. How do we start? 4. What happens next?
High-performing IT organisations report experiencing: 200x more frequent deployments
High-performing IT organisations report experiencing: 24x faster recovery from failures
High-performing IT organisations report experiencing: 3x lower change failure rate
High-performing IT organisations report experiencing: 2,555x shorter lead times
High-performing IT organisations report experiencing: 22% less time on unplanned
work and rework
High-performing organisations decisively outperform their lower- performing peers in terms
of throughput.
None
Where are we now? (In the APS)
IT as a cost centre
Delivery approach: Buy and adapt
custom product & commodity
Buy and adapt: Upfront requirement gathering
Buy and adapt: Long procurement cycles
Inward looking
Supporting people and activities within your organisation
Guardians of legacy heritage
Heritage: Systems that are why our organisations are still here
Fragile software
High defect rates
High-performing IT organisations report experiencing: 3x lower change failure rate
Low user satisfaction (if we know what it is at
all)
Slow turnaround on even simple changes
Hierarchical management
“Cylinders of excellence”
People grouped around functional specialties
“The developers”
“Ops team”
PMO
Work bounces between groups
High-performing IT organisations report experiencing: 2,555x shorter lead times
Resilient
Where do we want to be? (if we’re serious about
digital transformation)
• IT as a cost centre • Technology as a
value driver nope
Outward looking
User Centred Design
“What is the user need?”
Delivering services to support users outside your organisation
Who are your users?
The public is a user
Your organisation is also a user
You can not sustainably meet user needs if you are
not meeting your own needs at the same time.
Sustainable, resilient, internal capability
Multidisciplinary teams
Augmented by private sector expertise
Teams organised around services
Services built for end-to-end task completion
Do the hard work to make it easy for users
Delivery approach: Leverage and iterate
Leverage and iterate Knowing when & where to re-use, build,
or buy
Leverage and iterate Eliminate undifferentiated heavy lifting
commodity custom
Leverage and iterate Use Open Source
Leverage and iterate Use the ☁ (Software & Platforms &
Infrastructure as a Service)
☁ Software
Leverage and iterate SaaS: Support and ticketing systems (JIRA, Zendesk,
GitHub)
☁ Software ☁ Platform
Leverage and iterate PaaS: Application runtime and resiliency (Heroku, Cloud
Foundry)
☁ Infrastructure ☁ Software ☁ Platform
Leverage and iterate IaaS: Hosting (AWS, Azure, Vault, GCP) IRAP
accredited by ASD
☁ Software ☁ Infrastructure ☁ Platform digital service
Risk management approach:
minimise technology investment risk
integration not adaptation
“Give me an API, or give me death”
interoperability through high quality APIs
more options down the road
your systems end up being more resilient in the face
of change
But harder work because you must grow & maintain a
high performing culture
But harder work that supports a highly skilled software engineering
workforce
Redesigning the org to better meet policy and service delivery
outcomes
Feedback loops built in to the software we ship
Feedback loops supporting hypothesis driven development
Meeting objectives on-time & on-budget
High-performing IT organisations report experiencing: 22% less time on unplanned
work and rework
Meeting objectives on-time & on-budget: data driven
Meeting objectives on-time & on-budget: weekly granularity
Meeting objectives on-time & on-budget: reported up and out
Trending towards state of devops metrics 200x more frequent deployments
24x faster recovery from failures 3x lower change failure rate 2,555x shorter lead times 22% less time on unplanned work and rework
“People with targets […] will probably meet the targets -
even if they have to destroy the enterprise to do it.” – Deming
Where do we start?
Start on the edges
Pick a small problem
Understand and serve a user need (as well as a
government need)
You can not sustainably meet user needs if you are
not meeting your own needs at the same time.
Use the Digital Service Standard as the guide for what
good looks like
Start with this
Then do this
Then this
Create small, multi-disciplinary teams
Template: 1x front end developer 1x back end developer 1x
user experience designer 1x agile coach (part time)
Use the Digital Service Standard as the guide for what
good looks like
No executive sponsorship? Don’t even bother.
Set delivery constraints
⏰ Time Budget Scope (pick 2)
Build the smallest, simplest thing that meets a user need
“You build it, you run it” – Vogels, AWS
Don’t change what tech you use
Change how you use that tech
Don’t blow your innovation budget on experimenting with tech
All changes go through a Continuous Delivery pipeline
deploy to production acceptance tests integrate unit tests code done
Continuous Delivery Manual Auto Auto Auto
Multiple deploys a day
High-performing IT organisations report experiencing: 200x more frequent deployments
Code doesn’t create value until it is running in front
of a user
Ship usable software multiple times a day
Write high level acceptance tests (like Cucumber)
An executable specification
Feature: Refund item Scenario: Jeff returns a faulty microwave Given
Jeff has bought a microwave for $100 And he has a receipt When he returns the microwave Then Jeff should be refunded $100
Nail your automated delivery pipeline from the start
Decouple what you build from existing systems
Build in isolation
Don’t create dependencies
Manual processing is OK
No point investing in automation until you have validated the
service meets a user need
Risk: you automate the wrong thing
automation is a means
meeting a user need is the end
manage team workload by: only sending a percentage of the
workload to the service
Bonus: build empathy with users by doing the grunt work
What happens next?
DO NOT DISBAND THE TEAM
The team don’t get reabsorbed
The service doesn’t get lobbed over the wall
It’s not a one-off
It’s not a project
It’s a long lived service
Team and service need to be resilient
Team continues with the service
No executive sponsorship? Don’t even bother.
“This worked well! Let’s scale it up!”
Limit scope creep
Amazon’s two pizza teams rule
Don’t aim for economies of scale
Scale out, not up
The goal: Simple, self contained systems, interacting with one another…
The goal: … supported by teams who are iterating each
system independently, to meet complex user needs.
Prefer duplication over dependency
Dependencies introduce blockers
You don’t want blockers when you’re iterating quickly
But what about legacy?
“APIs for applications”
Teams create APIs for services they consume
legacy system new service intermediary API new system
Longer term: modernise your existing systems
Longer term: upgrade functionality, peicemeal
legacy system new service intermediary API ❌ ⬅ manual at
first
Event sourcing
https://developers.soundcloud.com/blog/building-products-at- soundcloud-part-1-dealing-with-the-monolith
https://developers.soundcloud.com/blog/building-products-at- soundcloud-part-1-dealing-with-the-monolith
https://developers.soundcloud.com/blog/building-products-at- soundcloud-part-1-dealing-with-the-monolith
Short term: It’s not about modernising your legacy
It’s about providing services that meet user needs
It’s about organising people in your organisation to meeting those
user needs
It’s about building the future of how your organisation works
The biggest challenge:
Minimal software engineering culture in the APS
Leverage and iterate Knowing when & where to re-use, build,
or buy
Limiting and managing risk
commodity custom
We must drive a cultural change in technology delivery
We do that by attracting talent & cultivating the talent
we have
We do that with modern technology delivery practices like continuous
delivery
We do that by reinforcing the resiliency of our organisations
“If the government was a private company, it would go
out of business”
Great sound bite
Counterfactual
Government is not a private company
Businesses are designed to fold
When a business fails: People become unemployed.
When a business fails: Assets are liquidated.
When a business fails: Creditors are paid.
When a business fails: Shareholders loose cash.
When a business fails: If there is demand, other businesses
in the market will fill that gap.
Governments are designed not to fail
Government is designed to be resilient
When a government fails: The underpinning of a society disappears.
When a government fails: Folk-systems emerge to fill the gaps.
When a government fails: Inequality and inequity thrive.
When a government fails: People get hurt. People die.
Government has built-in inertia
Inertia is linked to resilience
Government is designed to be resistant to change
Digital transformation of government means changing something designed not to
change
Resilience is our greatest strength and our greatest weakness
Newton’s first law an object at rest stays at rest
Newton’s first law an object in motion stays in motion
Newton’s first law an object in motion stays in motion
with the same speed
Newton’s first law an object in motion stays in motion
with the same speed and in the same direction
Newton’s first law unless acted upon by an unbalanced force
Digital transformation is your unbalanced force
We must drive a cultural change in technology delivery
We do that not by changing the technology we use
We do that by changing the how we use that
tech
We do that with modern technology delivery practices like continuous
delivery
We do that by attracting talent & cultivating the talent
we have
I’m Lindsay
Thank you