Upgrade to PRO for Only $50/Year—Limited-Time Offer! 🔥
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Search
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Programming
15
1.6k
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Fluent 2015
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Tweet
Share
More Decks by benvinegar
See All by benvinegar
Getting the most out of JavaScript errors
benvinegar
1
350
JavaScript Error Reporting (and Why We Can't Have Nice Things)
benvinegar
0
230
FSTO: Re-evaluating Front-end Peformance Best Practices
benvinegar
9
1.1k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
複数人でのCLI/Infrastructure as Codeの暮らしを良くする
shmokmt
5
2.3k
ハイパーメディア駆動アプリケーションとIslandアーキテクチャ: htmxによるWebアプリケーション開発と動的UIの局所的適用
nowaki28
0
420
20 years of Symfony, what's next?
fabpot
2
360
MAP, Jigsaw, Code Golf 振り返り会 by 関東Kaggler会|Jigsaw 15th Solution
hasibirok0
0
240
Giselleで作るAI QAアシスタント 〜 Pull Requestレビューに継続的QAを
codenote
0
190
20251212 AI 時代的 Legacy Code 營救術 2025 WebConf
mouson
0
170
AtCoder Conference 2025「LLM時代のAHC」
imjk
2
490
Github Copilotのチャット履歴ビューワーを作りました~WPF、dotnet10もあるよ~ #clrh111
katsuyuzu
0
110
Why Kotlin? 電子カルテを Kotlin で開発する理由 / Why Kotlin? at Henry
agatan
2
7.3k
関数実行の裏側では何が起きているのか?
minop1205
1
700
認証・認可の基本を学ぼう前編
kouyuume
0
250
AIコードレビューがチームの"文脈"を 読めるようになるまで
marutaku
0
350
Featured
See All Featured
4 Signs Your Business is Dying
shpigford
186
22k
StorybookのUI Testing Handbookを読んだ
zakiyama
31
6.5k
Embracing the Ebb and Flow
colly
88
4.9k
Fashionably flexible responsive web design (full day workshop)
malarkey
407
66k
Automating Front-end Workflow
addyosmani
1371
200k
個人開発の失敗を避けるイケてる考え方 / tips for indie hackers
panda_program
122
21k
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
527
40k
Building Flexible Design Systems
yeseniaperezcruz
330
39k
[SF Ruby Conf 2025] Rails X
palkan
0
520
jQuery: Nuts, Bolts and Bling
dougneiner
65
8.3k
Scaling GitHub
holman
464
140k
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
162
23k
Transcript
re-evaluating front-end performance best practices
@bentlegen
None
None
car·go cult
cargo cult web performance
how does it happen?
deprecated … • books • blog posts • best practice
guides • StackOverflow answers • performance analysis tools • practices on live websites • conference talks like this one
the agenda • hostname sharding • for-loop array length caching
• dynamic script insertion
hostname sharding
in the beginning (HTTP 1.0)
with more connections 2 4 8 www www www
with hostname sharding 2 2 2 www www1, www2 www1
www2 www3 www4
still common Website # Static Hosts plus.google.com 4 tumblr.com 4
alibaba.com 4 theverge.com 4 ebay.com 6 businessinsider.com 6 netflix.com 11!
None
not a big deal anymore
browser connections/origin Browser # HTTP / origin Chrome 42 6
Firefox 37 8 Safari 7 6 IE 8, 9 6 IE 10 8 IE 11 13 bit.ly/rprf-bscope
chrome caps parallel image requests at 10 anyways bit.ly/rprf-bscope
rise of https stalled/ proxy negotiation dns! lookup connection +
tls/ssl time-to- first-byte download tls/ssl handshake
and http/2 will make all this irrelevant anyways
“2 domains for non-SPDY modern browsers” – Souders in 2013
bit.ly/rprf-2domains
etsy case study • 4 image domains → 2 •
50-80 ms faster for image heavy pages • 30-50 ms faster overall • up to 500ms faster on mobile bit.ly/rprf-etsy
the web’s moving on Website # Static Hosts netflix.com* 1
nytimes.com 1 youtube.com 2 twitter.com 2 facebook.com 2 pinterest.com 2 bbc.co.uk 2 etsy.com 3
looping
specifically array length caching in for loops
for (var i = 0, len = arr.length; i <
len; i++) { // do stuff } for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { // do stuff } vs
None
None
None
does it still hold?
cache vs no cache Chrome 42 Firefox 37 Safari 7
IE9+ IE8 ops/second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 78%
V8 (and other browsers) recognize this pattern bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
uncached version
cached version
“we should start assuming that our code is optimized” -
Vyacheslav Egorov, V8 bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
if you can trivially optimize it, the browser (probably) can
too
mobile disagrees, a little Chrome 41 (Android 5.1) Firefox 34
(Android 5.1) Safari (iOS 8) ops / second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 95%
if you think you’re going to get performance gains from
optimizing for loops you’re gonna have a bad time
dynamic script insertion
<script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script);
</script> vs <script src="/app.js"></script>
None
None
who does this? • analytics: GA, Mixpanel, Chartbeat, Wordpress •
widgets: Disqus, Facebook Comments • JS module loaders: RequireJS, LabJS • script managers: Google Tag Manager, Segment
small problem: CSS Object Model
CSS Object Model (CCSOM) <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! ! !
<script> window.getComputedStyle(document.body).margin; </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
CSSOM + dynamic script insertion <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! !
! <script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script); </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
dynamic script insertion scripts execute inline scripts can’t execute until
CSSOM ready; downloading is delayed
blocking 2nd script downloads after 1st executes 1st script preloaded
1st script executes
“Have we been doing it all wrong?” - Ilya Grigorik,
2014 bit.ly/rprf-injected
3rd option: async attribute <script async src="/app.js"></script>
ideal: async attribute both scripts execute all 3 resources download
in parallel
we should probably start using async
None
closing thoughts
don’t always believe what you read on the internet
benchmark your own stuff
benchmark your own stuff every year, apparently
always bet on browsers (and JS engines)
thanks
acknowledgements • performance research: Steve Souders, Ilya Grigorik, Guy Podjarny,
Vyacheslav Egorov, Jonathan Klein, Paul Irish, Nicholas Zakas • photos: Christian Junker, André Hofmeister, “My aim is true” • me: Ben Vinegar (@bentlegen) • office hours @ 1:30 PM today