Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Search
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Programming
15
1.6k
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Fluent 2015
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Tweet
Share
More Decks by benvinegar
See All by benvinegar
Getting the most out of JavaScript errors
benvinegar
1
340
JavaScript Error Reporting (and Why We Can't Have Nice Things)
benvinegar
0
220
FSTO: Re-evaluating Front-end Peformance Best Practices
benvinegar
9
1k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
[DevinMeetupTokyo2025] コード書かせないDevinの使い方
takumiyoshikawa
2
260
DMMを支える決済基盤の技術的負債にどう立ち向かうか / Addressing Technical Debt in Payment Infrastructure
yoshiyoshifujii
5
760
Claude Code と OpenAI o3 で メタデータ情報を作る
laket
0
110
#QiitaBash TDDで(自分の)開発がどう変わったか
ryosukedtomita
1
350
オホーツクでコミュニティを立ち上げた理由―地方出身プログラマの挑戦 / TechRAMEN 2025 Conference
lemonade_37
1
430
React 使いじゃなくても知っておきたい教養としての React
oukayuka
18
5.3k
書き捨てではなく継続開発可能なコードをAIコーディングエージェントで書くために意識していること
shuyakinjo
0
200
Vibe coding コードレビュー
kinopeee
0
410
11年かかって やっとVibe Codingに 時代が追いつきましたね
yimajo
1
240
Comparing decimals in Swift Testing
417_72ki
0
160
ZeroETLで始めるDynamoDBとS3の連携
afooooil
0
150
0から始めるモジュラーモノリス-クリーンなモノリスを目指して
sushi0120
0
250
Featured
See All Featured
A designer walks into a library…
pauljervisheath
207
24k
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
marcelosomers
234
17k
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
PRO
656
60k
The Cult of Friendly URLs
andyhume
79
6.5k
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
431
65k
YesSQL, Process and Tooling at Scale
rocio
173
14k
Music & Morning Musume
bryan
46
6.7k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
223
9.9k
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
695
190k
Docker and Python
trallard
45
3.5k
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
332
22k
Six Lessons from altMBA
skipperchong
28
3.9k
Transcript
re-evaluating front-end performance best practices
@bentlegen
None
None
car·go cult
cargo cult web performance
how does it happen?
deprecated … • books • blog posts • best practice
guides • StackOverflow answers • performance analysis tools • practices on live websites • conference talks like this one
the agenda • hostname sharding • for-loop array length caching
• dynamic script insertion
hostname sharding
in the beginning (HTTP 1.0)
with more connections 2 4 8 www www www
with hostname sharding 2 2 2 www www1, www2 www1
www2 www3 www4
still common Website # Static Hosts plus.google.com 4 tumblr.com 4
alibaba.com 4 theverge.com 4 ebay.com 6 businessinsider.com 6 netflix.com 11!
None
not a big deal anymore
browser connections/origin Browser # HTTP / origin Chrome 42 6
Firefox 37 8 Safari 7 6 IE 8, 9 6 IE 10 8 IE 11 13 bit.ly/rprf-bscope
chrome caps parallel image requests at 10 anyways bit.ly/rprf-bscope
rise of https stalled/ proxy negotiation dns! lookup connection +
tls/ssl time-to- first-byte download tls/ssl handshake
and http/2 will make all this irrelevant anyways
“2 domains for non-SPDY modern browsers” – Souders in 2013
bit.ly/rprf-2domains
etsy case study • 4 image domains → 2 •
50-80 ms faster for image heavy pages • 30-50 ms faster overall • up to 500ms faster on mobile bit.ly/rprf-etsy
the web’s moving on Website # Static Hosts netflix.com* 1
nytimes.com 1 youtube.com 2 twitter.com 2 facebook.com 2 pinterest.com 2 bbc.co.uk 2 etsy.com 3
looping
specifically array length caching in for loops
for (var i = 0, len = arr.length; i <
len; i++) { // do stuff } for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { // do stuff } vs
None
None
None
does it still hold?
cache vs no cache Chrome 42 Firefox 37 Safari 7
IE9+ IE8 ops/second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 78%
V8 (and other browsers) recognize this pattern bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
uncached version
cached version
“we should start assuming that our code is optimized” -
Vyacheslav Egorov, V8 bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
if you can trivially optimize it, the browser (probably) can
too
mobile disagrees, a little Chrome 41 (Android 5.1) Firefox 34
(Android 5.1) Safari (iOS 8) ops / second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 95%
if you think you’re going to get performance gains from
optimizing for loops you’re gonna have a bad time
dynamic script insertion
<script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script);
</script> vs <script src="/app.js"></script>
None
None
who does this? • analytics: GA, Mixpanel, Chartbeat, Wordpress •
widgets: Disqus, Facebook Comments • JS module loaders: RequireJS, LabJS • script managers: Google Tag Manager, Segment
small problem: CSS Object Model
CSS Object Model (CCSOM) <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! ! !
<script> window.getComputedStyle(document.body).margin; </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
CSSOM + dynamic script insertion <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! !
! <script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script); </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
dynamic script insertion scripts execute inline scripts can’t execute until
CSSOM ready; downloading is delayed
blocking 2nd script downloads after 1st executes 1st script preloaded
1st script executes
“Have we been doing it all wrong?” - Ilya Grigorik,
2014 bit.ly/rprf-injected
3rd option: async attribute <script async src="/app.js"></script>
ideal: async attribute both scripts execute all 3 resources download
in parallel
we should probably start using async
None
closing thoughts
don’t always believe what you read on the internet
benchmark your own stuff
benchmark your own stuff every year, apparently
always bet on browsers (and JS engines)
thanks
acknowledgements • performance research: Steve Souders, Ilya Grigorik, Guy Podjarny,
Vyacheslav Egorov, Jonathan Klein, Paul Irish, Nicholas Zakas • photos: Christian Junker, André Hofmeister, “My aim is true” • me: Ben Vinegar (@bentlegen) • office hours @ 1:30 PM today