Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Search
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Programming
15
1.6k
Re-evaluating Front-end Performance Best Practices
Fluent 2015
benvinegar
April 21, 2015
Tweet
Share
More Decks by benvinegar
See All by benvinegar
Getting the most out of JavaScript errors
benvinegar
1
270
JavaScript Error Reporting (and Why We Can't Have Nice Things)
benvinegar
0
200
FSTO: Re-evaluating Front-end Peformance Best Practices
benvinegar
9
790
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Rubyでたのしむクリエイティブコーディング/Enjoy Creative coding with Ruby
chobishiba
1
160
AWS Application Composerで始める、 サーバーレスなデータ基盤構築 / 20240406-jawsug-hokuriku-shinkansen
kasacchiful
1
250
Milestoner
bkuhlmann
1
400
大規模Reactアプリのリアーキテクチャ~8万行のTanStack Query移行の軌跡~
kj455
3
780
コードレビューで学ぶ!Kotlinオブジェクト指向デザインパターン
akkie76
2
180
Designing for tomorrow's programming workflows
honnibal
PRO
2
110
甘い香りに誘われてVanilla Extractを1年間運用してみた
miyahkun
1
110
雑に思考を整理する技術と効能
konifar
55
25k
Folding Cheat Sheet #2
philipschwarz
PRO
0
110
今、知っておきたい! 生成AIエージェントの世界
elith
3
340
try!Swift Tokyo 2024 参加報告 LT
akidon0000
1
190
受託開発でGitLab CI を活用していく
xiombatsg
1
270
Featured
See All Featured
Principles of Awesome APIs and How to Build Them.
keavy
120
16k
Visualization
eitanlees
135
14k
What's new in Ruby 2.0
geeforr
337
31k
The Brand Is Dead. Long Live the Brand.
mthomps
48
28k
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
171
8.9k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
301
110k
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
14
2.1k
What the flash - Photography Introduction
edds
64
11k
What's in a price? How to price your products and services
michaelherold
237
11k
Clear Off the Table
cherdarchuk
83
310k
Designing Experiences People Love
moore
136
23k
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
108
5.5k
Transcript
re-evaluating front-end performance best practices
@bentlegen
None
None
car·go cult
cargo cult web performance
how does it happen?
deprecated … • books • blog posts • best practice
guides • StackOverflow answers • performance analysis tools • practices on live websites • conference talks like this one
the agenda • hostname sharding • for-loop array length caching
• dynamic script insertion
hostname sharding
in the beginning (HTTP 1.0)
with more connections 2 4 8 www www www
with hostname sharding 2 2 2 www www1, www2 www1
www2 www3 www4
still common Website # Static Hosts plus.google.com 4 tumblr.com 4
alibaba.com 4 theverge.com 4 ebay.com 6 businessinsider.com 6 netflix.com 11!
None
not a big deal anymore
browser connections/origin Browser # HTTP / origin Chrome 42 6
Firefox 37 8 Safari 7 6 IE 8, 9 6 IE 10 8 IE 11 13 bit.ly/rprf-bscope
chrome caps parallel image requests at 10 anyways bit.ly/rprf-bscope
rise of https stalled/ proxy negotiation dns! lookup connection +
tls/ssl time-to- first-byte download tls/ssl handshake
and http/2 will make all this irrelevant anyways
“2 domains for non-SPDY modern browsers” – Souders in 2013
bit.ly/rprf-2domains
etsy case study • 4 image domains → 2 •
50-80 ms faster for image heavy pages • 30-50 ms faster overall • up to 500ms faster on mobile bit.ly/rprf-etsy
the web’s moving on Website # Static Hosts netflix.com* 1
nytimes.com 1 youtube.com 2 twitter.com 2 facebook.com 2 pinterest.com 2 bbc.co.uk 2 etsy.com 3
looping
specifically array length caching in for loops
for (var i = 0, len = arr.length; i <
len; i++) { // do stuff } for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { // do stuff } vs
None
None
None
does it still hold?
cache vs no cache Chrome 42 Firefox 37 Safari 7
IE9+ IE8 ops/second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 78%
V8 (and other browsers) recognize this pattern bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
uncached version
cached version
“we should start assuming that our code is optimized” -
Vyacheslav Egorov, V8 bit.ly/rprf-v8opt
if you can trivially optimize it, the browser (probably) can
too
mobile disagrees, a little Chrome 41 (Android 5.1) Firefox 34
(Android 5.1) Safari (iOS 8) ops / second (normalized), bigger is better cache no cache 95%
if you think you’re going to get performance gains from
optimizing for loops you’re gonna have a bad time
dynamic script insertion
<script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script);
</script> vs <script src="/app.js"></script>
None
None
who does this? • analytics: GA, Mixpanel, Chartbeat, Wordpress •
widgets: Disqus, Facebook Comments • JS module loaders: RequireJS, LabJS • script managers: Google Tag Manager, Segment
small problem: CSS Object Model
CSS Object Model (CCSOM) <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! ! !
<script> window.getComputedStyle(document.body).margin; </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
CSSOM + dynamic script insertion <link type="text/stylesheet" href="/main.css"/> ! !
! <script> var script = document.createElement('script'); script.src = '/app.js'; document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] .appendChild(script); </script> can’t execute until CSS ready
dynamic script insertion scripts execute inline scripts can’t execute until
CSSOM ready; downloading is delayed
blocking 2nd script downloads after 1st executes 1st script preloaded
1st script executes
“Have we been doing it all wrong?” - Ilya Grigorik,
2014 bit.ly/rprf-injected
3rd option: async attribute <script async src="/app.js"></script>
ideal: async attribute both scripts execute all 3 resources download
in parallel
we should probably start using async
None
closing thoughts
don’t always believe what you read on the internet
benchmark your own stuff
benchmark your own stuff every year, apparently
always bet on browsers (and JS engines)
thanks
acknowledgements • performance research: Steve Souders, Ilya Grigorik, Guy Podjarny,
Vyacheslav Egorov, Jonathan Klein, Paul Irish, Nicholas Zakas • photos: Christian Junker, André Hofmeister, “My aim is true” • me: Ben Vinegar (@bentlegen) • office hours @ 1:30 PM today