Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
REST - Valtech
Search
Sponsored
·
SiteGround - Reliable hosting with speed, security, and support you can count on.
→
Mårten Gustafson
March 09, 2012
Programming
430
4
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
REST - Valtech
Presentation on REST given at Valtech Stockholm.
Approx 60 minutes.
Mårten Gustafson
March 09, 2012
More Decks by Mårten Gustafson
See All by Mårten Gustafson
Github all the things!
chids
3
390
Bastardised Kanban
chids
0
1.5k
Heroku as a production platform
chids
0
220
DevOps @ KnowIT
chids
0
220
Opinions on DevOps
chids
2
670
The OPS side of DEV
chids
9
4.6k
[Swedish] NoSQL at Javaforum Stockholm
chids
2
220
Approaching and evaluating NoSQL
chids
3
230
Automation @ Hitta.se and why it happened
chids
1
320
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
AI時代に学ぶ 好きなルール 嫌いなルール Linter編
shorty5121
0
800
Building an Out-of-Order CPU
latte72
0
620
Deep dive into the select statement (GopherCon UK)
jespino
0
170
コンパウンドプロダクト開発のためのローカルプロセスマネージャー再発明 #layerxgo
izumin5210
0
620
書籍「プロフェッショナルAI駆動開発」紹介スライド
juntaromatsumoto
0
960
【デモ】Kiroで体験する仕様駆動開発|設計からコーディングまでAIと進める開発フロー
cmkudo
0
560
リアルな遅延を測る仕様
kota_yata
1
140
20260828_品質と開発生産性を両立させる、AI時代のE2Eテストの考え方
magicpod
0
130
이 함수, 실패하면 어떻게 되나요? null부터 Rich Errors까지, Kotlin 에러 처리 15년
haeti2
0
120
Jindong: Introducing Declarative Haptics in Compose Multiplatform
l2hyunwoo
0
140
初心者DevRelとして参加者だった私が、DevRel Talks!#2に登壇するまでにしてきたこと
sokohirai
0
330
Can LLMs Replicate 4 Years of Compose Migration? Exploring the boundaries of automation with 279 XML files from a real product
makun
0
130
Featured
See All Featured
From π to Pie charts
rasagy
0
350
Music & Morning Musume
bryan
47
7.4k
The Art of Delivering Value - GDevCon NA Keynote
reverentgeek
16
2.1k
Unlocking the hidden potential of vector embeddings in international SEO
frankvandijk
0
920
Why Mistakes Are the Best Teachers: Turning Failure into a Pathway for Growth
auna
0
240
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
59
7k
Exploring anti-patterns in Rails
aemeredith
3
490
Exploring the Power of Turbo Streams & Action Cable | RailsConf2023
kevinliebholz
37
6.6k
New Earth Scene 8
popppiees
3
2.5k
DevOps and Value Stream Thinking: Enabling flow, efficiency and business value
helenjbeal
1
370
Groundhog Day: Seeking Process in Gaming for Health
codingconduct
0
330
Everyday Curiosity
cassininazir
0
310
Transcript
Hi! My name is Mårten Gustafson
I used to work here...
...now I work here... (and I brought give-away readers)
Representational State Transfer
Representational State Transfer
REST
RESTful
HTTP
means of INTEGRATING disparate stuff
(my DARK and shameful PAST) * 4 years of: **
IBM WebSphere ** ESB ** SOAP/WSDL ** Enterprisey * REST vs SOAP vs HTTP vs JMS vs WMQ vs PUB/SUB vs EDA vs HA vs D/R
INTEGRATIONs
APIs
INTERFACEs
UNIFORM * REST defines a uniform interface * As opposed
to SOAP, CORBA, etc
GET PUT POST DELETE - list all foo - 501
- create a new foo - 501 a/b/c/foo
GET PUT POST DELETE - details of {id} - update
the {id} - 501 - delete the {id} a/b/c/foo/{id}
VERBs
(OPTIONS) * not common (yet) * mention: pre-flight
GET * retrieve
HEAD * retrieve without content (ie metadata)
POST * create (without known id) or update (with/without -
unsafe)
PUT * update or create with known id (idempotent)
DELETE * remove
(TRACE) * ?
(CONNECT) * ?
IDEMPOTENT * Without side effects * Fine to call multiple
times
safe idempotent unsafe OPTIONS X (x) GET X (x) HEAD
X (x) POST X PUT X X DELETE X X TRACE X (x) CONNECT
DEVELOPing
WELL BEHAVED * be well behaved * read up on
HTTP/1.1
ETag * The most overlooked HTTP header in API design?
Allows concurrency control * if-match: “<etag>” * if-none-match: “<etag>” * 304 not modified * version number
VARY * Tell clients/caches which headers that forms the response
(ie what’s the cache-combo) * ie: Vary: Accept ( /foo/bar vs /foo/bar : XML vs JSON)
CACHE-CONTROL * age * no-cache * no-store
EXPIRES * Expire any cached copies after...
BENEFITs
CLIENTS PROXIES SERVERS LOAD BALANCERS * will all understand and
act accordingly * in addition cool modern software does HTTP/REST out-of-the-box (CouchDB, Riak)
PLANNING
URLs * What will your URL scheme look like *
How will it evolve * Identify natural points of extension/evolution
DNS * This is part of your URL * Think
about partitioning (subdomains) * Think about future transition, separation, isolation * Does Wildcard DNS make sense to you?
SECURITY * HTTPS + basic auth (one stop shop) *
API auth (client certificates, OAuth) * SSL cookies
VERSIONING * This is the hard part
http://api.foo/v1/bar application/xml + easy (ie browser compatible)
http://api.foo/v1/bar application/xml - URL changes with version - Breaks the
URL = resource REST thingy
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml - hard (ie NOT browser compatible)
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml + version is independent of URL
application/vnd.foo-v1+xml application/vnd.foo-v2+xml * Vary: “Accept”
REPRESENTATION
http://api.foo/bar application/xml + easy (ie browser compatible)
http://api.foo/bar.xml + even easier (ie really browser compatible) - more
info in URL
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml + representation is independent of URL
USABILITY
PROXIES
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
HATEOAS
WAT?!
LINKs * State transitions
MIMEs * Representations
LINK + MIME
CONTRACTS * What do we promise our clients? * Read
these: - http://martinfowler.com/bliki/TolerantReader.html - http://martinfowler.com/articles/consumerDrivenContracts.html
SERIALIZED FORM + Easy programming (initially, typed proxies) - Rigid
(will not bend, will break)
SCHEMAS * Good for automated testing * If you give
them away, assume people will generate proxies (and depend on serialized form) * Consider not providing any (or model them loose, xs:any etc - I’m not sure it’s a good idea)
GUARANTEES * Fields annotated with “#userid” will have the following
form * Attributes named “email” will conform standard X * This document contains one, and only one field annotated “#id”, which is the unique id for Y
ROBUSTNESS
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> * XPath
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> /user/name/last * Rigid
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //last * Adaptive
* Might return multiple
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //last[1] * Adaptive
* Only one
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> *
Annotated
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //last[1]
* Still works
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //*[@id='#name.last'][1]
* Adaptive
<user> <id>1234</id> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </user> //*[@id='#name.last'][1] * Still
works
<named> <first id="#name.first">Mårten</first> <last id="#name.last">Gustafson</last> </named> //*[@id='#name.last'][1] * Still works
<yeah> <foo id="#name.first">Mårten</foo> <bar id="#name.last">Gustafson</bar> </yeah> //*[@id='#name.last'][1] * Still works
INFORMATION MODELLING * This is hard, usually “versioning hard”
#name.first * Format * Values * Guarantees
URL DNS MIME LINKS PROXY
URL DNS MIME LINKS =CONTRACT
?
@martengustafson
[email protected]
http://marten.gustafson.pp.se/talks * Representations