Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
REST - Valtech
Search
Sponsored
·
Ship Features Fearlessly
Turn features on and off without deploys. Used by thousands of Ruby developers.
→
Mårten Gustafson
March 09, 2012
Programming
420
4
Share
REST - Valtech
Presentation on REST given at Valtech Stockholm.
Approx 60 minutes.
Mårten Gustafson
March 09, 2012
More Decks by Mårten Gustafson
See All by Mårten Gustafson
Github all the things!
chids
3
390
Bastardised Kanban
chids
0
1.5k
Heroku as a production platform
chids
0
220
DevOps @ KnowIT
chids
0
210
Opinions on DevOps
chids
2
660
The OPS side of DEV
chids
9
4.6k
[Swedish] NoSQL at Javaforum Stockholm
chids
2
210
Approaching and evaluating NoSQL
chids
3
210
Automation @ Hitta.se and why it happened
chids
1
310
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
AI 時代のソフトウェア設計の学び方
masuda220
PRO
29
11k
柔軟なPDFレイアウトエディタを支える型システム設計 — Discriminated UnionとConditional Typeの実践
minako__ph
4
1.3k
CLIであることを活かしたGitHub Copilot CLI活用術 / GitHub Copilot CLI Pro Tips & Tricks
nao_mk2
1
1.2k
Oxlintはいかにしてtsgolintのlint ruleを呼び出しているのか
syumai
2
1.1k
New "Type" system on PicoRuby
pocke
1
410
OSもどきOS
arkw
0
380
開発体験を左右するライブラリの API 設計 - GraphQL スキーマ構築ライブラリから考える #tskaigi
izumin5210
2
1.5k
生成AI時代にこそ効くGo | Why Go Works in the Age of Generative AI
mom0tomo
8
3.1k
RTSPクライアントを自作してみた話
simotin13
0
420
CSC307 Lecture 17
javiergs
PRO
0
310
IBM Bobを活用したレガシーアプリの最新化
oniak3ibm
PRO
0
120
JJUG CCC 2026 Spring: JSpecify で実現する Kotlin フレンドリーな Java API 設計
ternbusty
1
130
Featured
See All Featured
How To Speak Unicorn (iThemes Webinar)
marktimemedia
1
470
Believing is Seeing
oripsolob
1
140
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
4.3k
Measuring & Analyzing Core Web Vitals
bluesmoon
9
850
Exploring the relationship between traditional SERPs and Gen AI search
raygrieselhuber
PRO
2
4k
Product Roadmaps are Hard
iamctodd
PRO
55
12k
What the history of the web can teach us about the future of AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
600
Typedesign – Prime Four
hannesfritz
42
3.1k
Agile that works and the tools we love
rasmusluckow
331
21k
Tell your own story through comics
letsgokoyo
1
940
ラッコキーワード サービス紹介資料
rakko
1
3.5M
Claude Code どこまでも/ Claude Code Everywhere
nwiizo
65
55k
Transcript
Hi! My name is Mårten Gustafson
I used to work here...
...now I work here... (and I brought give-away readers)
Representational State Transfer
Representational State Transfer
REST
RESTful
HTTP
means of INTEGRATING disparate stuff
(my DARK and shameful PAST) * 4 years of: **
IBM WebSphere ** ESB ** SOAP/WSDL ** Enterprisey * REST vs SOAP vs HTTP vs JMS vs WMQ vs PUB/SUB vs EDA vs HA vs D/R
INTEGRATIONs
APIs
INTERFACEs
UNIFORM * REST defines a uniform interface * As opposed
to SOAP, CORBA, etc
GET PUT POST DELETE - list all foo - 501
- create a new foo - 501 a/b/c/foo
GET PUT POST DELETE - details of {id} - update
the {id} - 501 - delete the {id} a/b/c/foo/{id}
VERBs
(OPTIONS) * not common (yet) * mention: pre-flight
GET * retrieve
HEAD * retrieve without content (ie metadata)
POST * create (without known id) or update (with/without -
unsafe)
PUT * update or create with known id (idempotent)
DELETE * remove
(TRACE) * ?
(CONNECT) * ?
IDEMPOTENT * Without side effects * Fine to call multiple
times
safe idempotent unsafe OPTIONS X (x) GET X (x) HEAD
X (x) POST X PUT X X DELETE X X TRACE X (x) CONNECT
DEVELOPing
WELL BEHAVED * be well behaved * read up on
HTTP/1.1
ETag * The most overlooked HTTP header in API design?
Allows concurrency control * if-match: “<etag>” * if-none-match: “<etag>” * 304 not modified * version number
VARY * Tell clients/caches which headers that forms the response
(ie what’s the cache-combo) * ie: Vary: Accept ( /foo/bar vs /foo/bar : XML vs JSON)
CACHE-CONTROL * age * no-cache * no-store
EXPIRES * Expire any cached copies after...
BENEFITs
CLIENTS PROXIES SERVERS LOAD BALANCERS * will all understand and
act accordingly * in addition cool modern software does HTTP/REST out-of-the-box (CouchDB, Riak)
PLANNING
URLs * What will your URL scheme look like *
How will it evolve * Identify natural points of extension/evolution
DNS * This is part of your URL * Think
about partitioning (subdomains) * Think about future transition, separation, isolation * Does Wildcard DNS make sense to you?
SECURITY * HTTPS + basic auth (one stop shop) *
API auth (client certificates, OAuth) * SSL cookies
VERSIONING * This is the hard part
http://api.foo/v1/bar application/xml + easy (ie browser compatible)
http://api.foo/v1/bar application/xml - URL changes with version - Breaks the
URL = resource REST thingy
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml - hard (ie NOT browser compatible)
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml + version is independent of URL
application/vnd.foo-v1+xml application/vnd.foo-v2+xml * Vary: “Accept”
REPRESENTATION
http://api.foo/bar application/xml + easy (ie browser compatible)
http://api.foo/bar.xml + even easier (ie really browser compatible) - more
info in URL
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml + representation is independent of URL
USABILITY
PROXIES
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
http://api.foo/v1/bar.xml http://api.foo/bar application/vnd.bar-v1+xml
HATEOAS
WAT?!
LINKs * State transitions
MIMEs * Representations
LINK + MIME
CONTRACTS * What do we promise our clients? * Read
these: - http://martinfowler.com/bliki/TolerantReader.html - http://martinfowler.com/articles/consumerDrivenContracts.html
SERIALIZED FORM + Easy programming (initially, typed proxies) - Rigid
(will not bend, will break)
SCHEMAS * Good for automated testing * If you give
them away, assume people will generate proxies (and depend on serialized form) * Consider not providing any (or model them loose, xs:any etc - I’m not sure it’s a good idea)
GUARANTEES * Fields annotated with “#userid” will have the following
form * Attributes named “email” will conform standard X * This document contains one, and only one field annotated “#id”, which is the unique id for Y
ROBUSTNESS
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> * XPath
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> /user/name/last * Rigid
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //last * Adaptive
* Might return multiple
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first>Mårten</first> <last>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //last[1] * Adaptive
* Only one
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> *
Annotated
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //last[1]
* Still works
<user> <id>1234</id> <name> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </name> </user> //*[@id='#name.last'][1]
* Adaptive
<user> <id>1234</id> <first id=”#name.first”>Mårten</first> <last id=”#name.last”>Gustafson</last> </user> //*[@id='#name.last'][1] * Still
works
<named> <first id="#name.first">Mårten</first> <last id="#name.last">Gustafson</last> </named> //*[@id='#name.last'][1] * Still works
<yeah> <foo id="#name.first">Mårten</foo> <bar id="#name.last">Gustafson</bar> </yeah> //*[@id='#name.last'][1] * Still works
INFORMATION MODELLING * This is hard, usually “versioning hard”
#name.first * Format * Values * Guarantees
URL DNS MIME LINKS PROXY
URL DNS MIME LINKS =CONTRACT
?
@martengustafson
[email protected]
http://marten.gustafson.pp.se/talks * Representations