$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »

self-calibration

 self-calibration

A talk about self-calibration for the SDSS-IV and SDSS-V projects.

David W Hogg

June 23, 2020
Tweet

More Decks by David W Hogg

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. self-calibration
    David W. Hogg
    (NYU) (MPIA) (Flatiron)

    View Slide

  2. What is self-calibration?
    Traditional calibration: Compare sources to (bright) standard stars taken as part of
    a calibration project. Or arcs and lamps.
    Self-calibration: Use the fact that the same source is observed by different parts
    of the detector, or in different modes. Enforce consistency to calibrate.

    View Slide

  3. Why employ self-calibration?
    Self-calibration uses the science data themselves to perform the calibration.
    Mitigate issues of cross-comparing observations at very different SNRs or
    exposure times.
    Reduce calibration overheads (though not to zero).
    It is more informative: Most of your photons are science photons!
    Simplify operations.

    View Slide

  4. Precise photometric surveys are all self-calibrated.
    SDSS Classic™ pioneered this in the optical (more in a moment).
    CMB surveys (NASA WMAP and ESA Planck, for instance, but all of them) have
    always been self-calibrated (you absolutely must self-calibrate if you want to do
    part-in-a-million intensity mapping!).
    NASA Kepler’s PDC detrending and my group’s CPM method are both forms of
    self-calibration. They were critical for exoplanet discovery.

    View Slide

  5. How did we calibrate the SDSS Classic™ imaging?
    Every star has 5 (true) magnitudes.
    Every night has 5 (true) extinctions (airmas terms).
    Every CCD column (why column?) has a photometric zeropoint.
    Many stars are observed on different nights in different CCDs or different CCD
    columns.
    Solve a very large set of linear equations (convex optimization FTW).

    View Slide

  6. Padmanabhan et al, arXiv:astro-ph/0703454

    View Slide

  7. Padmanabhan et al, arXiv:astro-ph/0703454

    View Slide

  8. There’s always a null space to any self-calibration.
    In the SDSS, there are five overall photometric zeropoints you can’t learn by
    self-calibration alone. We used certain F stars as absolute references.

    View Slide

  9. How are Kepler light curves self-calibrated?
    There are 105-ish stars with simultaneously measured light curves.
    These stars are not associated with one another.
    Any sense in which you can predict one star’s variability using other stars must be
    a spacecraft effect, not an intrinsic variability.
    Note the causal language (Wang et al, arXiv:1508.01853).

    View Slide

  10. Redundancy is critical.
    The key thing is to observe the same thing in different ways, and fit for all the
    dependencies that must be calibration-related.
    Diversify your data in the directions in which you most distrust your calibration
    (could be airmass, PSF, exposure time, detector orientation, season, etc.)

    View Slide

  11. Holmes, Hogg, & Rix, arXiv:1203.6255

    View Slide

  12. Could we self-calibrate the spectrographs?
    In spectrophotometric properties? Yes!
    In wavelength solution? For BOSS, Yes! For APOGEE, No!
    In EPRV spectrographs? Hell Yes! (work in progress by Lily Zhao, Yale).

    View Slide

  13. Could we self-calibrate element abundances?
    Stellar element abundances can depend strongly on position in the Galaxy, and on
    kinematics.
    They should not depend strongly on surface gravity (with exceptions).
    They should not depend on fiber number, airmass, or extinction.
    Can we use these principles to self-calibrate? (Hogg et al, SDSS Project 202)

    View Slide

  14. Image credit: Anna-Christina Eilers (MIT)

    View Slide

  15. Image credit: Anna Christina Eilers (MIT)

    View Slide

  16. Image credit: Anna Christina Eilers (MIT)

    View Slide

  17. Summary
    Self-calibration is more precise than traditional calibration.
    It reduces overheads and simplifies operations, but it introduces important survey
    design considerations.
    There are prospects for further improvements to SDSS-IV and SDSS-V data.

    View Slide