Lock in $30 Savings on PRO—Offer Ends Soon! ⏳
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Micro Performance Improvements
Search
Ernesto Tagwerker
April 26, 2017
Technology
0
61
Micro Performance Improvements
A few changes that you can do to your code to make it have a faster performance
Ernesto Tagwerker
April 26, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Ernesto Tagwerker
See All by Ernesto Tagwerker
Stuck in the Tar Pit at Sin City Ruby '24
etagwerker
1
300
Lightning Talk: Escaping the Tar Pit
etagwerker
1
130
Fortify Rails Webinar
etagwerker
0
2.4k
Here Be Dragons: The Hidden Gems of Technical Debt
etagwerker
0
240
Lessons Learned from Open Source
etagwerker
0
100
Upgrading Rails: The Dual-Boot Way
etagwerker
1
480
Ruby 3.0 & Rails 6.1
etagwerker
0
200
RubyMem: The Leaky Gems Database for Bundler at Ruby Kaigi Takeout 2020
etagwerker
0
270
Escaping The Tar Pit at NYC.rb
etagwerker
0
120
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
今年のデータ・ML系アップデートと気になるアプデのご紹介
nayuts
1
310
ChatGPTで論⽂は読めるのか
spatial_ai_network
8
28k
AIと二人三脚で育てた、個人開発アプリグロース術
zozotech
PRO
1
720
モダンデータスタック (MDS) の話とデータ分析が起こすビジネス変革
sutotakeshi
0
480
20251209_WAKECareer_生成AIを活用した設計・開発プロセス
syobochim
7
1.5k
Sansanが実践する Platform EngineeringとSREの協創
sansantech
PRO
2
840
大企業でもできる!ボトムアップで拡大させるプラットフォームの作り方
findy_eventslides
1
760
文字列の並び順 / Unicode Collation
tmtms
3
570
コンテキスト情報を活用し個社最適化されたAI Agentを実現する4つのポイント
kworkdev
PRO
0
870
AIプラットフォームにおけるMLflowの利用について
lycorptech_jp
PRO
1
130
Fashion×AI「似合う」を届けるためのWEARのAI戦略
zozotech
PRO
2
150
CARTAのAI CoE が挑む「事業を進化させる AI エンジニアリング」 / carta ai coe evolution business ai engineering
carta_engineering
0
950
Featured
See All Featured
Java REST API Framework Comparison - PWX 2021
mraible
34
9k
It's Worth the Effort
3n
187
29k
Building an army of robots
kneath
306
46k
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
162
23k
The Cult of Friendly URLs
andyhume
79
6.7k
The Myth of the Modular Monolith - Day 2 Keynote - Rails World 2024
eileencodes
26
3.2k
How GitHub (no longer) Works
holman
316
140k
Improving Core Web Vitals using Speculation Rules API
sergeychernyshev
21
1.3k
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
9.9k
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
84
9.3k
Being A Developer After 40
akosma
91
590k
Automating Front-end Workflow
addyosmani
1371
200k
Transcript
Micro Performance Improvements RailsConf, April 2017
Ernesto Tagwerker @etagwerker Founder & Software Developer at Ombu Labs
Best Practices 3
https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide
https://speakerdeck.com/sferik/writing-fast-ruby
Bad Code vs. Good Code 6
# Bad return true unless OBJECT.nil? # Good return true
if OBJECT
Benchmark.ips do |x| OBJECT = "nil".freeze x.report("unless nil") do true
unless OBJECT.nil? end x.report("if object") do true if OBJECT end x.compare! end
$ bundle exec ruby benchmarks/unless_nil_vs_if_object.rb Ruby version: 2.3.3 Warming up
-------------------------------------- unless nil 251.994k i/100ms if object 267.552k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- unless nil 9.435M (± 6.9%) i/s - 47.123M in 5.021124s if object 11.431M (± 4.9%) i/s - 57.256M in 5.021363s Comparison: if object: 11431148.2 i/s unless nil: 9435226.8 i/s - 1.21x slower
# OK phone = Hash.new(number: number) phone[:number] # Better Phone
= Struct.new(:number) phone = Phone.new(number) phone.number
$ bundle exec ruby benchmarks/struct_vs_hash.rb Ruby version: 2.3.3 Warming up
-------------------------------------- struct 22.148k i/100ms hash 4.688k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- struct 240.460k (± 2.7%) i/s - 1.218M in 5.069592s hash 47.926k (± 3.9%) i/s - 243.776k in 5.094413s Comparison: struct: 240459.9 i/s hash: 47926.1 i/s - 5.02x slower
# Bad HOUR_6 = Time.parse("2000-01-01 06:00:00 UTC") # Good HOUR_6
= Time.at(946685160).utc
$ bundle exec ruby benchmarks/time/parse_vs_at.rb Ruby version: 2.3.3 Warming up
-------------------------------------- Time.parse 3.287k i/100ms Time.at 66.086k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- Time.parse 34.052k (± 3.2%) i/s - 170.924k in 5.024737s Time.at 842.576k (± 2.2%) i/s - 4.230M in 5.022207s Comparison: Time.at: 842576.2 i/s Time.parse: 34051.9 i/s - 24.74x slower
# Bad Post.select(:id).map(&:id) # Good Post.pluck(:id)
$ bundle exec rake benches:pluck_vs_map Ruby version: 2.3.3 Warming up
-------------------------------------- map(&:id) 11.000 i/100ms pluck(:id) 80.000 i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- map(&:id) 124.205 (±11.3%) i/s - 616.000 in 5.026999s pluck(:id) 807.127 (± 2.0%) i/s - 4.080k in 5.057062s Comparison: pluck(:id): 807.1 i/s map(&:id): 124.2 i/s - 6.50x slower
Resources 16
17 https://github.com/ombulabs/benches/ https://github.com/evanphx/benchmark-ips https://github.com/evanphx/benchmark.fyi
Thank you! @etagwerker 18