Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Micro Performance Improvements
Search
Ernesto Tagwerker
April 26, 2017
Technology
0
55
Micro Performance Improvements
A few changes that you can do to your code to make it have a faster performance
Ernesto Tagwerker
April 26, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Ernesto Tagwerker
See All by Ernesto Tagwerker
Stuck in the Tar Pit at Sin City Ruby '24
etagwerker
1
250
Lightning Talk: Escaping the Tar Pit
etagwerker
1
110
Fortify Rails Webinar
etagwerker
0
2.2k
Here Be Dragons: The Hidden Gems of Technical Debt
etagwerker
0
190
Lessons Learned from Open Source
etagwerker
0
80
Upgrading Rails: The Dual-Boot Way
etagwerker
1
460
Ruby 3.0 & Rails 6.1
etagwerker
0
170
RubyMem: The Leaky Gems Database for Bundler at Ruby Kaigi Takeout 2020
etagwerker
0
230
Escaping The Tar Pit at NYC.rb
etagwerker
0
94
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
データエンジニアリング領域におけるDuckDBのユースケース
chanyou0311
9
2.2k
EMConf JP 2025 懇親会LT / EMConf JP 2025 social gathering
sugamasao
2
190
2/18 Making Security Scale: メルカリが考えるセキュリティ戦略 - Coincheck x LayerX x Mercari
jsonf
0
190
Apache Iceberg Case Study in LY Corporation
lycorptech_jp
PRO
0
310
内製化を加速させるlaC活用術
nrinetcom
PRO
2
140
入門 PEAK Threat Hunting @SECCON
odorusatoshi
0
150
クラウドサービス事業者におけるOSS
tagomoris
4
1k
4th place solution Eedi - Mining Misconceptions in Mathematics
rist
0
140
AWSではじめる Web APIテスト実践ガイド / A practical guide to testing Web APIs on AWS
yokawasa
7
660
Visualize, Visualize, Visualize and rclone
tomoaki0705
9
82k
NFV基盤のOpenStack更新 ~9世代バージョンアップへの挑戦~
vtj
0
350
Raycast Favorites × Script Command で実現するお手軽情報チェック
smasato
1
140
Featured
See All Featured
Building Your Own Lightsaber
phodgson
104
6.2k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
22
3.3k
Design and Strategy: How to Deal with People Who Don’t "Get" Design
morganepeng
129
19k
Documentation Writing (for coders)
carmenintech
67
4.6k
Build your cross-platform service in a week with App Engine
jlugia
229
18k
Visualization
eitanlees
146
15k
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
521
39k
The Cult of Friendly URLs
andyhume
78
6.2k
Done Done
chrislema
182
16k
Statistics for Hackers
jakevdp
797
220k
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
33
2.8k
個人開発の失敗を避けるイケてる考え方 / tips for indie hackers
panda_program
100
18k
Transcript
Micro Performance Improvements RailsConf, April 2017
Ernesto Tagwerker @etagwerker Founder & Software Developer at Ombu Labs
Best Practices 3
https://github.com/bbatsov/ruby-style-guide
https://speakerdeck.com/sferik/writing-fast-ruby
Bad Code vs. Good Code 6
# Bad return true unless OBJECT.nil? # Good return true
if OBJECT
Benchmark.ips do |x| OBJECT = "nil".freeze x.report("unless nil") do true
unless OBJECT.nil? end x.report("if object") do true if OBJECT end x.compare! end
$ bundle exec ruby benchmarks/unless_nil_vs_if_object.rb Ruby version: 2.3.3 Warming up
-------------------------------------- unless nil 251.994k i/100ms if object 267.552k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- unless nil 9.435M (± 6.9%) i/s - 47.123M in 5.021124s if object 11.431M (± 4.9%) i/s - 57.256M in 5.021363s Comparison: if object: 11431148.2 i/s unless nil: 9435226.8 i/s - 1.21x slower
# OK phone = Hash.new(number: number) phone[:number] # Better Phone
= Struct.new(:number) phone = Phone.new(number) phone.number
$ bundle exec ruby benchmarks/struct_vs_hash.rb Ruby version: 2.3.3 Warming up
-------------------------------------- struct 22.148k i/100ms hash 4.688k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- struct 240.460k (± 2.7%) i/s - 1.218M in 5.069592s hash 47.926k (± 3.9%) i/s - 243.776k in 5.094413s Comparison: struct: 240459.9 i/s hash: 47926.1 i/s - 5.02x slower
# Bad HOUR_6 = Time.parse("2000-01-01 06:00:00 UTC") # Good HOUR_6
= Time.at(946685160).utc
$ bundle exec ruby benchmarks/time/parse_vs_at.rb Ruby version: 2.3.3 Warming up
-------------------------------------- Time.parse 3.287k i/100ms Time.at 66.086k i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- Time.parse 34.052k (± 3.2%) i/s - 170.924k in 5.024737s Time.at 842.576k (± 2.2%) i/s - 4.230M in 5.022207s Comparison: Time.at: 842576.2 i/s Time.parse: 34051.9 i/s - 24.74x slower
# Bad Post.select(:id).map(&:id) # Good Post.pluck(:id)
$ bundle exec rake benches:pluck_vs_map Ruby version: 2.3.3 Warming up
-------------------------------------- map(&:id) 11.000 i/100ms pluck(:id) 80.000 i/100ms Calculating ------------------------------------- map(&:id) 124.205 (±11.3%) i/s - 616.000 in 5.026999s pluck(:id) 807.127 (± 2.0%) i/s - 4.080k in 5.057062s Comparison: pluck(:id): 807.1 i/s map(&:id): 124.2 i/s - 6.50x slower
Resources 16
17 https://github.com/ombulabs/benches/ https://github.com/evanphx/benchmark-ips https://github.com/evanphx/benchmark.fyi
Thank you! @etagwerker 18