a “natural” pattern of evolution. Animals and plants grow better, and self-regulate, if human beings do not interfere Policy – Let the forest go “naturally” and re-introduce “natural” species (i.e. already existing boars coming from Hungary)
to ground and water facilities Traditional competences disappear New breeds appear (i.e. imported boars mix up with local domestic pigs and create a new generation of “monsters”)
Nostra and other “urban” associations (Civil Society 1) have the power to design and rule Natural Parks They act for the “preservation” of “true” wilderness, and existing species (as “natural” artefacts), in a sort of “creationist frame”
be cultivated. Animals and plants grow better if “competent” human beings design and monitor their biological evolution (interfere) Policy – In the age of “genome” a new wilderness can be “designed”, in order to tackle nowadays risks of existing species
contribute to hydro-geological improvement New competences “emerge” by integrating traditional and new knowledge New breeds appear, but a powerful feed back system controls undesired effects
(Civil Society 2) have the power to design and rule Green Communities (constituency) The production of a local “sustainable wilderness” (as “emerging” artefact), is the result of a complex interaction between a national network and a set of local GC
for GC action: a) Narratives development b) Empowerment (power to achieve) c) Action and feed back d) New agent/artefact spaces e) Controversy (identity and voice) f) Organisation (challenging establishment)