at TheZebra.com) Write high quality content on subjects you actually know things about. Have an author bio and page with links out to other places you write about similar subjects and links to your social media. Make sure those sources highlight your expertise. Who you write for, where you studied, books you’ve written, etc. Get links from and give links to authoritative sources and people on similar subjects. Make sure the user experience on the sites you write on is great too.
To compete with the visual content channels, Google is surfacing more visual content in the SERPs and adding more features that allow users to get exactly where they want to go. This will threaten standard Organic positions for web content.
Competitive The video and image real estate in Google is going to become even more competitive since marketers recognize short form video as high ROI and the primary way to reach Gen Z.
A primary mistake that content marketers make is only publishing their short form videos on a channel like TikTok, Instagram, or YouTube. You should also publish them on your site using tools like Wistia and marking them up so they can appear in the SERPs.
Bad we Got Panda and Penguin Panda fundamentally changed Organic Search. You could no longer create “SEO content” and rank. The SEO community then embraced content marketing knowing that it’s the only way forward with creating content that yields utility. Penguin did the same for links. Google’s Helpful Content update could be the new sheriff in town.
are about to ramp up the content marketing deluge. https://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/ 6307/bid/34080/Why-Marketers-Nee d-to-Rise-Above-the-Deluge-of-Crappy- Content.aspx
are a variety of tools out there that “detect” generative AI content. However, they are all unreliable in that they can yield both false negatives and false positives. Even the people who built the best generative AI tools can only correctly detect it at 26% accuracy.
Teeth Google has been working on getting the Helpful Content classifier right. The early iterations had limited impact, but now sites are getting smacked left and right. We’re also seeing the threshold for crawling and indexing pages has been raised.
Gain Conceptually, as it relates to search engines, Information Gain is the measure of how much unique information a given document adds to the ranking set of documents. In other words, what are you talking about that your competitors are not?
Search Engines Do Fundamentally, this is the basis of how search engines function. Google has developed many layers on top of this, but this is the core of what they all do.
Primary Search Models What we as the SEO community do not have a strong enough handle on is that most of what Google’s doing is on the semantic side and that has all improved dramatically over the last 10 years based on machine learning.
we talk about relevance, it’s the question of similar is determined by how similar the vectors are between documents and queries. This is a quantitative measure, not the qualitative idea of how we typically think of relevance.
by Tomas Milosevic and Jeff Dean that yielded an improvement in natural language understanding by using neural networks to compute word vectors. These were better at capturing meaning. Many follow-on innovations like Sentence2Vec and Doc2Vec would follow.
the idea of “aspect embeddings” which is series of embeddings that represent the full elements of both the query and the document and give stronger access to deeper information.
pages as embeddings, there are vectors representing websites and Google has recently made improvements in understanding when content is not relevant to a given site.
Bigger 1. The query is more natural language and no longer Orwellian Newspeak. It can be much longer than the 32 words that is has been historically in order 2. The Featured Snippet has become the “AI snapshot” which takes 3 results and builds a summary. 3. Users can also ask follow up questions in conversational mode. 3 2 1
in the level of natural language query that Google can support, we’re going to see a lot less head terms and a lot more long tail term. Going down Going up
results being pushed down by the AI snapshot experience, what is considered #1 will change. We should also expect that any organic result will be clicked less and the standard organic will drop dramatically. However, this will likely yield query displacement.
we’ll need to decide what is considered the #1 result. Based on this screenshot positions 1-3 are now the citations for the AI snapshot and #4 is below it. However, the AI snapshot loads on the client side, so rank tracking tools will need to change their approach.
maintains the context window of the previous search in the journey as the user goes through predefined follow questions. This will need to drive the composition of pages to ensure they remain in the consideration set for subsequent results.
Neeva (RIP), Bing, and now Google’s Search Generative Experience all use pull documents based on search queries and feed them to a language model to generate a response.
PaLM 2 and MUM MUM is the Multitask Unified Model that Google announced in 2021 as way to do retrieval augmented generation. PaLM 2 is their latest state of the art large language model.
Not Being Right They evaluate Bing Chat, NeevaAI, http://perplexity.ai & YouChat—only 52% of statements are supported by citations and 75% of citations actually support their statements. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09848
index from your documents index = VectorStoreIndex.from_documents(documents) # Setup your index for citations query_engine = CitationQueryEngine.from_args( index, # indicate how many document chunks it should return similarity_top_k=5, # here we can control how granular citation sources are, the default is 512 citation_chunk_size=155, ) response = query_engine.query("Answer the following query in 150 words: " + query)
are three models gaining popularity: 1. KG-enhanced LLMs - Language Model uses KG during pre-training and inference 2. LLM-augmented KGs - LLMs do reasoning and completion on KG data 3. Synergized LLMs + KGs - Multilayer system using both at the same time https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.08302.pdf Source: Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap
sitemap_url = "[SITEMAP URL]" sitemap = adv.sitemap_to_df(sitemap_url) urls_to_crawl = sitemap['loc'].tolist() ... # Make an index from your documents index = VectorStoreIndex.from_documents(documents) # Setup your index for citations query_engine = CitationQueryEngine.from_args( index, # indicate how many document chunks it should return similarity_top_k=5, # here we can control how granular citation sources are, the default is 512 citation_chunk_size=155, ) response = query_engine.query("YOUR PROMPT HERE")
not verification of facts. • LLM + KG integrations make this a possibility and Google needs to combat the wealth of content being produced with LLMs. So, it’s likely they will use this functionality. Source: Fact Checking in Knowledge Graphs by Logical Consistency Source: FactKG: Fact Verification via Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs
Multiplier • 52% of business leaders are currently using AI content generation tools to assist their content marketing efforts. • 64.7% of business leaders plan to use AI content generation tools to assist their content marketing efforts in 2023. Major brands are using tools like ChatGPT and Midjourney to scale their content marketing efforts. The brands that don’t leverage these tools are quickly falling behind. Source: Siege Media + Clearscope
On It Individuals are using tools like ChatGPT in isolation, but for an organization to capitalize on it there needs to be a generative AI content strategy that encourages governance and consistency of the content created.
1. Generative AI is not the end-all-be-all solution. It is not the replacement for a content strategy or your content team. 2. Generative AI for content creation should be a force multiplier to be utilized to improve workflow and augment strategy. 3. You should consider generative AI content for awareness efforts, but continue to leverage subject matter experts for lower funnel content. GENERATIVE AI OPPORTUNITIES & THREATS
Generative AI Leveraging our extensive enterprise Content Strategy experience, we take an 8-step approach to make generative AI tools learn to speak in your brand voice and we build out solutions to bake the functionality into your toolkit. We take a deep dive into how your Content Strategy currently operates to replicate and expand on it through AI. We look for places in your existing processes and tools to integrate AI functionality. We build out the content models, workflows, governance models, and toolkit for generative AI. We develop a library of prompts to be used across your organization for various content use cases. We run the prompts through a series of QA tests to ensure that content is always generated as expected. We improve prompts that do not pass our QA tests. We deliver the prompts and training on how to use the new content systems. We update and optimize prompts as generative AI tools update and emerge. Strategic Planning We tailor our approach to your goals and existing content strategy. Generative AI Delivery We deliver vetted prompts and train your team on generative AI systems. Review Client Goals and Content Strategy Identify AI integration points Prepare Generative AI Content Plan Output QA Build Prompt Library Optimize Outputs Knowledge Transfer Maintenance OUR GENERATIVE AI PROCESS
should I be doing? Write with Information Gain in mind Keep an eye on threats in the SERPs Use structured data wherever possible Use tools to understand how relevant Google thinks your content is Build an actual content strategy around generative AI Build a prompt library Build custom indexes for stronger generative AI content creation Treat your byline as the asset that it is By ready for search behavior to change Optimize the chunks
[email protected] Award Winning, #GirlDad Featured by Get Your SGE Threat Report: https://ipullrank.com/sge-report Play with Raggle: https://www.raggle.net