[email protected] @jgbarah Bitergia / LibreSoft (URJC) http://bit.ly/openstack-long-reviews OpenStack Summit Tokyo 2015 Tokyo (Japan), October 29th 2015 Jesus Gonzalez-Barahona (Bitergia) Who to blame for long code reviews OpenStack Summit Tokyo 2015 1 / 26
under the “Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0” license, by Creative Commons, available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Jesus Gonzalez-Barahona (Bitergia) Who to blame for long code reviews OpenStack Summit Tokyo 2015 2 / 26
software development analytics company Dashboards, reports, consultancy... http://bitergia.com Associate Professor at URJC: Understanding free, open source software development Empirical, data analytics approach http://gsyc.es/~jgb Jesus Gonzalez-Barahona (Bitergia) Who to blame for long code reviews OpenStack Summit Tokyo 2015 3 / 26
them are accepted after a few patchsets (1-3) Hardly final reviewers accepting them: they are recovering contributions from the far past But there are projects with less long reviews than others For abandoned changesets, probably abandon earlier (but some are still useful after very long periods!) For merged changesets, what about a policy ensuring review in less than x days? Jesus Gonzalez-Barahona (Bitergia) Who to blame for long code reviews OpenStack Summit Tokyo 2015 26 / 26