multiple processes ‣ with multiple branches ‣ and/or subprocesses ‣ can be stopped / restarted (if running with persistent storage) ‣ can run multiple versions of any process ‣ has to allow in-flight modifications to processes
in a multi-process env ‣ it has defense mechanisms things like ‘tickets’ and ‘locks’ ‣ they have a cost :-( ‣ suggestions ‣ avoid mp envs for ruote (the engine is idle most of the time) ‣ run ruote as a webservice in a 1p env ‣ (ruote in 1p can use “caching” and be faster)
‣ why not 1 engine per domain / unit ? ‣ why not a separation between tactical and technical engines ? ‣ why not engines that talk to each other ? ‣ scale the business or scale the tools ?
only 1 op at a time ‣ by default, uses Thread/Queue ‣ uses EventMachine if present ‣ future work : ‣ fibers ? ‣ it’s an implementation away ‣ anyway, engine is idle most of the time (usually waiting for those slow humans)
now these commands were only meant for the enclosing cursor/ repeat ‣ now with :tag and :ref, more precision is possible ‣ works with the iterator expression as well