Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Semilinear elliptic equations with critical Sobolev exponent and non-homogeneous term

Semilinear elliptic equations with critical Sobolev exponent and non-homogeneous term

RIMS Workshop: Shapes and other properties of solutions of PDEs
11 Nov 2015
Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University

Kazune Takahashi

November 11, 2015
Tweet

More Decks by Kazune Takahashi

Other Decks in Research

Transcript

  1. Semilinear elliptic equations with critical Sobolev exponent and non-homogeneous term

    Kazune Takahashi (The University of Tokyo) RIMS Workshop — Shapes and other properties of solutions of PDEs November, 11, 2015
  2. Constraints RN (N 3) Bounded smooth domain a L (

    ) is the first eigenvalue of . 1 D a in is a constant such that . > 1 b L ( ) b 0 in , b 0 * * *
  3. Main Problem u + au = bup + f in

    , u > 0 in , u = 0 on . ( ) f H 1 ( ), f 0, f 0 > 0 Parameter Critical Sobolev Exponent p = N+2 N 2
  4. u + au = bup + f in , u

    > 0 in , u = 0 on . ( ) Existence of solutions depends on Involving critical Sobolev exponent p = N+2 N 2 Dimension Shape of N
  5. H1 0 ( ) Lq ( ) Compact 1 q

    < p + 1 Subspace, but not compact Background: Sobolev Embedding Not subspace generally H1 0 ( ) Lq ( ) * * * (q > p + 1) H1 0 ( ) Lp+1 ( )
  6. Why consider Sobolev Embedding? Definition. u H1 0 ( )

    is a weak solution of ( ) (Du · D + au ) dx = bup dx + f dx H1 0 ( ) th power of function H1 0 ( ) (p + 1) Integrable, but no convergence property
  7. Known Result (1) u = (1 + u)p in ,

    u > 0 in , u = 0 on . (1) Chase two solutions : 1. Minimal Solution 2. Second Solution u u
  8. Minimal/Second Solution Definition. 1. is the minimal solution u for

    any solution . u 2. is a second solution u is other than . u u u u in
  9. u = (1 + u)p in , u > 0

    in , u = 0 on . (1) Minimal Solution of (1) Theorem. (Keener-Keller ’74, Crandall — Rabinowitz ’75) There exists so that (1) has > 0 the minimal solution for . only one solution when . no solution for . < = >
  10. u = (1 + u)p in , u > 0

    in , u = 0 on . (1) Second Solution of (1) Theorem 1. (Brezis-Nirenberg ’83) (1) has a second solution for . 0 < < The mountain pass theorem The Talenti function Keys:
  11. Mountain Pass Theorem The Highest point of the “lowest pass”

    is a critical point = solution. Can we get this point as the limit of a sequence? The Talenti function
  12. Known Result (2) (2) Theorem 2. (Tarantello ’92) (2) has

    at least 2 solutions for small . u = up + f in , u > 0 in , u = 0 on . The mountain pass theorem The Talenti function Keys: > 0 ( ) with : a = 0, b = 1
  13. Known Result (3) (3) ( ) with : a =

    , b = 1 u + u = up + f in , u > 0 in , u = 0 on .
  14. Minimal Solution of (3) (3) u + u = up

    + f in , u > 0 in , u = 0 on . There exists so that (3) has > 0 the minimal solution for . only one solution when . no solution for . < = > Theorem. (Naito-Sato ’12)
  15. Second Solution of (3) (3) u + u = up

    + f in , u > 0 in , u = 0 on . Theorem 3. (Naito-Sato) 0 < < Let . Assume either: Then, (3) has a second solution. (i) and (ii) and 1 < 0 N 3 > 0 N = 3, 4, 5
  16. Solutions of (3) with . Minimal Solution 0 · L

    Second Solution N = 3, 4, 5 N 6 > 0
  17. Minimal Solution of . There exists so that has >

    0 the minimal solution for . only one solution when if . no solution for . < = > Theorem. (T) ( ) ( ) u + au = bup + f in , u > 0 in , u = 0 on . ( ) b > 0 in
  18. Second Solution of . ( ) * 0 < <

    * b achieves its maximum at . x0 M is continuous near . x0 * b * near . x0 Assumptions. a(x) = m1 + m2|x x0|q + o(|x x0|q)
  19. Second Solution of . ( ) u + au =

    bup + f in , u > 0 in , u = 0 on . ( ) Main Theorem. (T) Assume either: Then, (3) has a second solution. (i) and (ii) and (iii) , and (iv) , and N 3 m1 < 0 m1 > 0 N = 3, 4, 5 m1 = 0 m1 = 0 m2 > 0 m2 < 0 N 3 3 N < 6 + 2q
  20. Solutions of .- (iv) Minimal Solution 0 · L Second

    Solution ( ) 3 N < 6 + 2q a(x) = m2|x x0|q
  21. Comparison between (3) and . ( ) N < 6

    + 2q a = m2|x x0|q -(iv) ( ) a(x) x0 (3)-(ii) (3)-(i) a = 0 N < N < 6 a = > 0 0 > 0 0 (3)-(i) (3)-(ii) N < 6 N <
  22. — Equation of . v Instead of a second solution

    , we chase . v = u u u ( : the minimal solution ) u v + av = b (v + u )p up in , v > 0 in , v = 0 on . ( ) ( )
  23. Catch by variational method v G(t, s, x) = b(x)

    1 p + 1 (t+ + s)p+1 1 p + 1 sp+1 spt+ 1 2a(x)t2 + Here, is defined by G: R R R We write as . G(v, u ) G(v(x), u (x), x) I (v) = 1 2 |Dv|2 dx G(v, u )dx v H1 0 ( ) is a solution of ( ) v is a critical point of
  24. I (v) = 1 2 |Dv|2 dx b 1 p

    + 1 (v + u )p+1 1 p + 1up+1 upv dx + 1 2 av2 dx.
  25. Sufficient conditions The mountain pass theorem A critical point of

    I (v) condition (PS)c details omitted The Talenti function sup t>0 I (tv0) < 1 NM(N 2)/2 SN/2 v0 H1 0 ( ) : nonnegative ( )
  26. Best Sobolev constant Definition. S = inf u H1 0

    (V),u 0 Du 2 L2(V) u 2 Lp+1(V) V RN For , is the best Sobolev constant. Proposition. The infimum is achieved by the Talenti function when . V = RN
  27. Talenti function Definition. The Talenti function is U(x) = 1

    (1 + |x|2)(N 2)/2 (x RN ) We mend this: u (x) = (x) ( + |x|2)(N 2)/2 , v (x) = u (x) b1/(p+1)u Lp+1( ) ( > 0) cut-off function
  28. Calculation of Integrals sup t>0 I (tv ) = I

    (t v ) The supremum is achieved: H (v, u ) I (v) = 1 2 |Dv|2 dx + 1 p + 1 bvp+1 dx b 1 p + 1 (v + u )p+1 1 p + 1vp+1 1 p + 1up+1 upv dx + 1 2 av2 dx. Divide into 3 lines: depending on q
  29. Calculation of first line 1 2t2 Dv 2 L2( )

    1 p + 1tp+1 sup t>0 1 2t2 Dv 2 L2( ) 1 p + 1tp+1 = 1 N Dv 2 L2( ) N/2 = 1 NM(N 2)/2 SN/2 + O( (N 2)/2 ). ( ) Left side of
  30. Integral of . H (t, s, x) = b(x) 1

    p + 1 (t + s)p+1 1 p + 1tp+1 1 p + 1 sp+1 spt Cb(x)tp for . x , t t0, s s0 H H (t v , u )dx C {|x| } b(x)(t v )pdx = C (N 2)/4 .
  31. Integral of . au2 dx = O(1) + m1I1 +

    m2I2 I1 = {|x |<r0 } 1 ( + |x|2)N 2 dx, I2 = {|x |<r0 } |x|q ( + |x|2)N 2 dx Here, We set We evaluate x0 = 0 av2
  32. Calculation of . I1, I2 I1 = O( (N 4)/2

    ) (N 5), O(|log |) (N = 4), O(1) (N = 3). : famous (referring Brezis-Nirenberg ’83) I1 I2 : calculated by ourselves I2 = O( (N q 4)/2 ) (N > q + 4), O(|log |) (N = q + 4), O(1) (N < q + 4).
  33. b1/(p+1)u 2 Lp+1( ) = O( (N 2)/2 ) We

    also have Then, we conclude av2 dx = O(1) + m1I1 + m2I2, I1 = O( ) (N 5), O( |log |) (N = 4), O( 1/2 ) (N = 3), I2 = O( 1+q/2 ) (N > q + 4), O( (N 2)/2|log |) (N = q + 4), O( (N 2)/2 ) (N < q + 4)
  34. sup t>0 I (tv ) 1 N M(N 2)/2 SN/2

    + C (N 2)/2 C (N 2)/4 + m1I1 + m2I2 Evaluation of . For small , > 0 Does there exist so that this ( )-part is negative? > 0 I av2 vp+1 and |Dv |2 H (t v , u )
  35. Proof of (iv) : . . m1 = 0, m2

    > 0 I2 (N 2)/4 it suffice to have . as 0 3 N < 6 + 2q 1 + q 2 > N 2 4 , that is, Since I2 = O( 1+q/2 ) (N > q + 4), O( (N 2)/2|log |) (N = q + 4), O( (N 2)/2 ) (N < q + 4), this is equivalent to To satisfy C (N 2)/2 C (N 2)/4 + m2I2 < 0 ,
  36. Solutions of .- (iv) Minimal Solution 0 · L Second

    Solution ( ) 3 N < 6 + 2q a(x) = m2|x x0|q