Knowledge Festival 2012 Emerging hackerspaces – Peer-production generation Jarkko Moilanen PhD Candidate [email protected] University of Tampere School of Information Sciences
motivation • Personal history in hackerspaces and in hacker culture • Started as pure 'hackerspaces' study, expanded to cover other forms as well. • To provide missing accurate longitudinal statistical research data and results about commons-based peer production community such as: • Common characteristics of the community • Member motivation and • Community values • To put DIY communities on the larger context of hacker generations as 'Peer-production' generation
and surveys • Methods used • Empirical observation (helped in defining survey questions) • Annual surveys (main data collection method) • Surveys are part of P2P Foundation supported Statistical Studies of Peer Production studies established by author.
loving altruistic community • Altruism, community commitment, meeting other hackers in real world and having fun • having fun (98%) • meeting other hackers and hacker-minded people (95%) • contributing to community without expecting something in return (80%) • commitment to community (75%)
funded • Question 'From which sources funding and resources can/should be obtained?' was added to 2011 survey. • Membership fees: over 92% • Donations from individuals: 88% • Governmental sources: 60% • Company donations: around 57%
generation Suggested view to Hacker generations. Source: Modified from Taylor (2005). Peer- production added by the author. Beginning of peer-production generation is debatable. Hackerspaces emerged in small scale around 1995, but breakthrough happened around 2001-2002 and after that other forms of peer-production emerged.
generation • Motivation: altruism, community commitment, meeting other hackers in real world and having fun • Small-ish local communities (with own space) • While members value social events, they value doing/'making' more • Peer funding (over company or goverment) • Hackerspaces resemble 'third places' defined by Oldenburg
model • hackerspace communities have a strong ‘social motivation factor’. Not found significant in other research on open source development Modified from Martine Aalbers, 2004. “Motivation for participation in an open source software community,” at http://download.blender.org/documentation/bc2004/Martine_Aalbers/results-summary.pdf
research • Continue annual surveys • Future (separate) surveys will focus on three communities to enable more profound results: • General DIY community (general features of Peer- production generation) • DIYbio community ('revolutionary activity') • 3D Manufacturing community ('revolutionary activity') • Compare the general Peer production generation to the two 'revolutionary' communities.