Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
RAFT: Implementing Distributed Consensus with E...
Search
Tim McGilchrist
May 08, 2014
Programming
710
4
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
RAFT: Implementing Distributed Consensus with Erlang
Talk from Yow LambdaJam 2014 in Brisbane on RAFT Algorithm and implementing it in Erlang.
Tim McGilchrist
May 08, 2014
More Decks by Tim McGilchrist
See All by Tim McGilchrist
Dependently Typed State Machines
lambda_foo
0
210
Code reuse through polymorphic variants
lambda_foo
1
260
Either Error Success
lambda_foo
0
170
Idris States: Dependent types, not just for vectors?
lambda_foo
0
280
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
これって Effect でできたのでは? / TSKaigi Mashup Kansai #2
susisu
0
140
生成AI導入の「期待外れ」を乗り越える ー 開発フロー改革が目指す、真の組織変革
starfish719
0
4k
Foundation Models frameworkで画像分析
ryodeveloper
1
590
自動化したのに回らないテスト運用の壁ーAI時代の品質責任と生産性
mfunaki
0
130
JAWS-UG横浜 #102 AWSサ終供養LT会 成仏できない AWS サービスたち 〜本日、三体供養します〜
maroon1st
0
330
PostgreSQL 18で考えるUUID主キー
kazuhiro1982
0
460
源内ハンズオン概要編
hideg
0
110
型も通る、synthも通る、それでも危ない 〜AIのCDKの権限とコストを機械で検証する〜 / It Passes Type Checks, It Passes Synth Checks, but It’s Still Risky — Automatically Verifying Permissions and Costs in AI’s CDK —
seike460
PRO
1
530
<title><a id="</title>君はこのHTMLをパースできるか"></a></title> #雑LT_study
pizzacat83
0
140
改善しないと、タスクが回らない。 “てんこ盛りポジション” を引き継いだ情シスの、入社3ヶ月の業務改善録
krm963
0
260
そこに3びきプロダクトがいるじゃろう——生成AI時代における“価値が届かない理由”の構造
kosuket
0
420
全PRの83%がAIレビューだけでマージできるようになった開発組織はその後どうなったか
athug
1
1.5k
Featured
See All Featured
Building Better People: How to give real-time feedback that sticks.
wjessup
370
20k
Building a Scalable Design System with Sketch
lauravandoore
463
34k
Discover your Explorer Soul
emna__ayadi
2
1.2k
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
378
71k
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
74
20k
Dominate Local Search Results - an insider guide to GBP, reviews, and Local SEO
greggifford
PRO
0
250
StorybookのUI Testing Handbookを読んだ
zakiyama
31
6.9k
Information Architects: The Missing Link in Design Systems
soysaucechin
0
1k
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
PRO
659
62k
The Myth of the Modular Monolith - Day 2 Keynote - Rails World 2024
eileencodes
28
3.6k
AI: The stuff that nobody shows you
jnunemaker
PRO
9
890
It's Worth the Effort
3n
188
29k
Transcript
Tim McGilchrist @lambda_foo lambdafoo.com Raft Implementing Distributed Consensus with Erlang
Outline ❖ Goals! ❖ The consensus problem! ❖ Outline RAFT
algorithm! ❖ Implementing in Erlang
Goals What I want you to get out of this
talk?! • Understand core ideas in RAFT! • Erlang / OTP as a tool for building systems! • Build your own implementation
Consensus In a distributed system, agreement among multiple processes on
a single data value, despite failures. ! ! Once they reach a decision on a value, that decision is final.
Potential Use Case ❖ Configuration Management! ❖ Distributed Transactions! ❖
Distributed Lock Manager! ❖ DNS and Resource Discovery
RAFT ❖ Design for understandability! ❖ Strong leader! ❖ Practical
to implement Goals Raft is a consensus algorithm that is designed to be easy to understand.
Messages ❖ RAFT only needs 2 messages.! ❖ RequestVote includes
term! ❖ AppendEntries includes term and log entries! ❖ Term acts as a logical clock
States 3 states a node can be in. Follower Candidate!
Leader
Leader Leader • Only a single leader within a cluster!
• Receives commands from client! • Commits commands to the log
Follower Follower • Appends commands to log! • Votes for
candidates! • Otherwise passive
Candidate Candidate! • Initiates Election! • Coordinates Votes
Leader Election Follower Candidate! Leader starts up timeout new election
gets majority of votes step down step down timeout restart election
Log Replication add 1 F2 F1 Leader AppendEntries add 1,
index 0 add 1, index 0
Log Replication add 1 add 1 add 1 F2 F1
Leader Ok OK
Log Replication add 1 add 1 add 1 F2 F1
Leader Executes command
Log Replication add 1 add 4 add 1 add 1
F2 F1 Leader AppendEntries add 4, index 1 add 4, index 1 Executes command Executes command
RAFT Summary ❖ 2 types of messages, RequestVote and AppendEntries!
❖ 3 states, Leader, Follower and Candidate! ❖ Save Entries to persistent log
Erlang ❖ Functional language! ❖ Fundamentally a concurrent language! ❖
Actor model as basic abstraction! ❖ No shared state between actors! ❖ OTP behaviours like supervisors and gen_fsm! ❖ Location independent message sending
Implementation Overview ❖ github.com/tmcgilchrist/sloop ! ❖ github.com/andrewjstone/ rafter! ❖ Each
node has 2 supervised behaviours! ❖ gen_fsm implementing the consensus protocol! ❖ gen_server wraps the log store! ❖ passes erlang terms as messages
sloop_fsm ❖ state machine implements leader election and log replication!
❖ each state is a function with multiple clauses! !
Supervisors sloop_sup sloop_fsm sloop_store sloop_state sender
Implementations ! ❖ raftconsensus.github.io! ❖ github.com/tmcgilchrist/sloop ! ❖ github.com/andrewjstone/rafter !
❖ github.com/goraft/raft
Summary ❖ Defined Distributed Consensus! ❖ Looked at core ideas
of RAFT! ❖ Erlang suits distributed systems! ❖ Map Erlang to RAFT
Thanks!