each has its own problems. • Plain Text: No format, difficult to unify expressions • CPE: Naming Problem ⇒ Shift to PURL, SWID, and GTIN etc… has been proposed1 9 [1] https://owasp.org/assets/files/posts/A%20Proposal%20to%20Operationalize%20Component%20Identification%20for%20Vulnerability%20Management.pdf
to read • Not using appropriate field in schema 10 • Affected Version cannot be determined ◦ Affected Version: 5.2.0 to 5.2.12, 5.0 and below 5.0 and below: “≦ 5.0.0” or “≦ 5.0.x” ?
CPE • affected products is wrong ◦ FG-IR-13-014(CVE-2013-1414) Affected Versions Fortinet:4.3.12 and prior versions, 5.0.2 and prior versions NVD: before 4.3.13 and 5.x before 5.0.2 • take time to add affected products ◦ FG-IR-22-398(CVE-2022-52574) Published Date Fortinet: 2022-12-12 NVD: 2023-01-02 11
system is good. • Easy Access to Advisory • Clear and Simple Schema • Advisory Suggestions and Modifications 13 [1] https://github.com/github/advisory-database
is often not mechanically readable and is not used. • If it is a vulnerability scanner, it has a significant impact on detection targets and detection accuracy. • Don't just read security advisory, use it! 14