Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up
for free
Building the School 2.0 - OpenFest Sofia - Marko Kažić
Марко Кажић
November 04, 2018
Education
0
210
Building the School 2.0 - OpenFest Sofia - Marko Kažić
Марко Кажић
November 04, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Марко Кажић
See All by Марко Кажић
marxo
0
120
marxo
0
110
marxo
0
38
marxo
0
76
marxo
0
130
marxo
0
77
marxo
0
63
Other Decks in Education
See All in Education
acoach
0
150
strikr
0
320
ytapples613
0
130
coderdojojapan
5
2.8k
faarsheik
0
680
salvemaria
0
190
yoshizaki_kkgk
1
2k
thirion
0
170
strikr
0
130
salvemaria
0
190
tosseto
0
170
matleenalaakso
0
1.5k
Featured
See All Featured
addyosmani
1346
190k
jacobian
255
20k
ammeep
655
54k
aarron
257
36k
morganepeng
18
1.2k
tanoku
86
8.6k
akmur
252
19k
hatefulcrawdad
257
17k
bkeepers
52
4.2k
sferik
610
55k
lauravandoore
437
28k
searls
204
36k
Transcript
BUILDING THE SCHOOL 2.0 MARKO KAŽIĆ @marxo
EDUCATION 1.0 THIS IS THE BEST THAT WE CAN DO,
REALLY.
Most of our learning is non-institutional WHERE DO WE LEARN
“Self-education is, I firmly believe, the only kind of education there is.” — Isaac Asimov
Social dynamic wrong Isolation as a service Discourages learning for
life as in living and as in lifelong Academy-first view of the world Cult of the average SCHOOL 1.0 – ISSUES
Offline-first Knowledge is fragmented Proprietery software, if any No common
shared resource Not agile Doesn’t leverage technology for evaluation Doesn’t adapt/personalize SCHOOL 1.0
ONLINE ≠ ONLINE Online built to mimic offline Decade of
the internet – 1990s Decade of the OER and Open Access – 2000s Decade of the MOOC – 2010s
ONLINE ≠ ONLINE Online built to mimic offline Decade of
the internet – 1990s Decade of the OER and Open Access – 2000s Decade of the MOOC – 2010s
OER - ISSUES • mostly academia • quality issues -
moderation • lack of human interaction between stakeholders • language and/or cultural barriers • discoverability • technology availability & disparity • intellectual property/copyright concerns • sustainability
• bad social dynamic • business model behind it all
• lack of human interaction between stakeholders • technology availability & disparity • retention MOOC - ISSUES
Audience has changed Goals have changed Society has changed Technology
has changed NOT SO BRAVE
“Changing education will not require technological advancement, but a tectonic
change of our existing means and ethics.” A MODEST REVOLUTION
EDUCATION 2.0 OPEN BY DEFAULT
A SPECTER IS HAUNTING THE WORLD – THE SPECTER OF
FREE EDUCATION.
WE SHOULDN’T PROFIT FROM PROVIDING EDUCATION, BUT BY REAPING THE
FRUITS OF GOOD EDUCATION.
DENOUNCING COMPETITION IS A STARTING POINT TO BUILDING A POST-SCARCITY
SOCIETY.
1. Don’t let education be governed by governments. 2. Don’t
let education be governed by corporations. 3. Don’t let education be ungoverned because we don’t know any better. ANTHROPOCENTRIC EDUCATION
The struggle for liberating knowledge has proven that it’s easier
to create corpuses of knowledge that are open and free by default. EDUCATION – A PUBLIC RESOURCE
1. Free as in freedom, free as in gratis 2.
Crowdsourced single source of truth 3. Personal and adaptive 4. Meritocratic 5. Biomimetic 6. Universal* SCHOOL 2.0
1. Governance open and transparent 2. Infrastructure open and common
3. Schools built as platforms 4. Services and goods leave space for profit and competition. SCHOOL 2.0 – “IDEAL“ IMPLEMENTATION
• Establishing a governing body • Sustainability • Building core
infrastructure • Licensing • Adoption SCHOOL 2.0 – INTRINSIC CHALLENGES
• Ethics of technology • Access to electricity • Access
to the internet • Access to personal computing units • Digital literacy SCHOOL 2.0 – EXTRINSIC CHALLENGES
SCHOOL 2.0 – BASE MODEL
ZAMPHYR AN ARCHETYPE OF THE SCHOOL 2.0
• to build a free corpus of CS knowledge •
to build free software that could serve as free school infrastructure • to explore platform requirements for a universal school • to test premises regarding sustainability of a free school ZAMPHYR – GOALS
School as a platform Virtual Learning Environment Offline Learning Environment
Identity Data API Social, continual, peer-to-peer learning Projects (Emulating real environment) ZAMPHYR – FEATURES
SCHOOL 2.0 – SCHOOL MODEL
1. Measure outcomes depending on module combinations, order and dynamic
2. Compile a path from combining factors 3. Spice 4. Everything nice ALGOGENERATED PATHS IMAGINE
• ODF • Virtual machine inside • Runs code in
the document VM • Document is an autonomous computer SMART DOCUMENTS IMAGINE
• Algogenerated content • Learning companion bots • Augmented social
engine • Impact analysis • Consensus-dependent evaluation • New digital didactics (i.e. TTS + Echo) MORE IMAGINE
1. Recruitment/ATS tools 2. Mentoring marketplace 3. Didactic tools 4.
Analysis tools (Code, skills, teams) 5. Bots, bots, bots BUILD ON ZAMPHYR COMMERCIAL EXAMPLES
SCHOOL 2.0 – FEDERATION MODEL
Identity service ready Virtual learning environment work in progress Offline
work in progress Community hub work in progress PROGRESS UPDATE NEXT STEPS
Knowledge exchange of all kinds and shapes Join the translation
community Help with legal expertise Advocate to government and industry stakeholders JOIN, CHANGE EVERYTHING NEXT STEPS
@marxo ХВАЛА! THANK YOU!