gas properties scale with the dark matter: ρ ∼ M0 T ∼ M/r ∼ M2/3 L ∼ ρ2T1/2r3 ∼ T2 T2 T3 Gas in the centers of clusters has lower density and higher entropy than gravitational self-similar models predict. (more so for lower masses.)
Instability Saturate? (Assuming it exists…) HQ; 10 (ρ/ρ0 ) xf> t+QQH/t77 = 1/10 tf> −R y R y R k j −k −R y R HQ; 10 (ρ/ρ0 ) xf> t+QQH/t77 = 10 tf> −R y R y R k j −R.y −y.8 y.y ermal Instability does not necessarily imply Multi-phase gas.
Instability Saturate? (Assuming it exists…) HQ; 10 (ρ/ρ0 ) xf> t+QQH/t77 = 1/10 tf> −R y R y R k j −k −R y R HQ; 10 (ρ/ρ0 ) xf> t+QQH/t77 = 10 tf> −R y R y R k j −R.y −y.8 y.y ermal Instability does not necessarily imply Multi-phase gas. See cold gas when tcool /tff 10
Saturation “Sinking Blobs” model (i. e. no buoyancy) Long cooling-time limit: δρ/ρ 1 What stops the instability? One possibility: sinking blobs mix into surroundings g t Joung et al. 2011
Saturation “Sinking Blobs” model (i. e. no buoyancy) Assume blobs survive for ∼ one scale-height: tsink ∼ H vsink + Archimedes’ principle: dv dt ∼ δρ ρ g ∼ vsink tsink ∼ v2 sink H + steady-state: t−1 cool ∼ t−1 sink g t Joung et al. 2011
Saturation “Sinking Blobs” model (i. e. no buoyancy) thA/t77 = 10 xf> −k −R y R k j −R.y −y.8 y.y thA/t77 = 3 −R.yy −y.d8 −y.8y −y.k8 thA/t77 = 1 −R.yy −y.d8 −y.8y −y.k8 thA/t77 = 1/10 HQ; 10 (ρ/ρ0 ) −k −R y R xf> tf> −j −k −R y R k j @j @k @R y R k j −y.k y.y y.k tf> −j −k −R y R k j −y.8 y.y y.8 tf> −j −k −R y R k j @RXy yXy RXy δρ/ρ tf> −j −k −R y R k j @RXy yXy RXy Perturbations don’t look like sinking blobs. Buoyancy is probably important.
Saturation “Sinking Blobs” model (i. e. no buoyancy) Assume blobs survive for ∼ one scale-height: tsink ∼ H vsink + Archimedes’ principle: dv dt ∼ δρ ρ g ∼ vsink ✞ ✝ ☎ ✆ tsink ∼ v2 sink H + steady-state: t−1 cool ∼ t−1 sink g t Joung et al. 2011
∝ (ˆ b ⋅ ˆ k) × (χetɪ ) e 5), to the point where the magnetic pressure n the filaments. The regions over which the ed are coincident with, but significantly longer on of the cold filaments. The field enhancement freezing as the cooling plasma is compressed o the initial field direction in the nonlinear state by contrast, in one at 1.43 Gyr (Figur state in two dimen regions to becom (because of the s 0 x(kpc) t=0.95 Gyr 0 20 40 −1 −0.5 0 x(kpc) z(kpc) t=0.475 Gyr 0 20 40 0 20 40 −0.13 −0.12 −0.11 −0.1 plots of log10 temperature (in keV) for the fiducial run (MWC) at linear (0.475 Gyr; left) he arrows show the magnetic field direction. this figure is available in the online journal.) Sharma et al. 2010 ✽ ✽ ✽ ➙ ➙ ➙ ✽ ➙ anisotropic isotropic tχ /tff tTI /tff Cold Fraction (by Mass) 10 −1 1 10 −2 10 −1 1 10 √ 2 √ 2 √ 2/10 10 √ 2 √ 2
tχ /t77 = ∞ xf> @k @R y R k j tχ /t77 = 10 √ 2 tχ /t77 = √ 2 tχ /t77 = √ 2/4 tχ /t77 = √ 2/10 thA/t77 = 10−0.75 xf> @k @R y R k j thA/t77 = 10−0.25 tf> xf> −j −k −R y R k @j @k @R y R k j tf> −j −k −R y R k tf> −j −k −R y R k tf> −j −k −R y R k tf> thA/t77 = 1 j −j −k −R y R k
Assuming that the ICM is thermally unstable, multi-phase gas forms only when tcool /tff 10. We can understand this threshold in terms of the non-linear saturation of the instability. Cooling and feedback self-regulate to the threshold for non-linear stability. Applications ermal instability enables us to understand: Why some clusters show filaments of cool gas while others don’t, How AGN feedback is triggered/regulated, and Why the gas profiles in clusters are not self-similar