Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Geo- and Astro-physical Fluid Dynamics Seminar

Geo- and Astro-physical Fluid Dynamics Seminar

April 2013 talk at UC Santa Cruz

Avatar for Mike McCourt

Mike McCourt

April 06, 2025
Tweet

More Decks by Mike McCourt

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. ￿ermal Instability and Gravity Waves in Galaxy Clusters Mike McCourt,

    Eliot Quataert, Prateek Sharma, & Ian Parrish April, ￿￿￿￿
  2. “￿ermal Instability and Gravity Waves in Clusters” ￿ Galaxy Cluster

    Primer ￿ Linear and Nonlinear ￿ermal Instability ￿ Astrophysical Applications ￿ Future Directions
  3. Abell 370 (optical) Representative Numbers ￿ R ∼ 3 −

    7 × 106 ly ￿ M ∼ 1014 − 1015 M⊙ ￿ T ∼ 5 × 107 K ￿ n ∼ 10−2 cm−3 ￿ Lx ∼ 1045 erg/s
  4. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Cluster Mass Budget

    stars (optical) hot gas (x-ray) Cluster Galaxy Kravtsov 2009 dark matter halos are largely self-similar…
  5. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Cluster Mass Budget

    stars (optical) hot gas (x-ray) Andreon 2010 …but clusters have more gas and fewer stars than galaxies.
  6. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Non-Self-Similarity If the

    gas properties scale with the dark matter: ￿ ρ ∼ M0 ￿ T ∼ M/r ∼ M2/3 ￿ L ∼ ρ2T1/2r3 ∼ T2 T2 T3 Gas in the centers of clusters has lower density and higher entropy than gravitational self-similar models predict. (more so for lower masses.)
  7. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Multi-Phase Gas in

    Clusters xray optical Fabian et al. 2011 Some clusters have neutral, ~￿￿￿ K gas colocated with the ionized, ~￿￿￿ K plasma!
  8. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion ￿ermal Instability in

    Clusters Conselice et al. 2005 Θ ≡ Net cooling rate ￿ ∂Θ ∂T ￿ P < ￿ ￿ermally unstable (Field ￿￿￿￿) Assume local thermal instability
  9. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Linear ￿ermal Instability

    Standard WKB analysis: ￿ initial equilibrium with H = L everywhere. ￿ L ∝ n2T1/2 for clusters. ￿ assume H ∝ nα Subtlety: gas is globally stabilized against cooling (see Balbus & Soker ￿￿￿￿). cooling timescale: pTI = ￿ 3 2 − α ￿ (γtcool) −1 (tcool ≡ E/L) dispersion relation: ω2 + iωpTI − N2 k2 ⊥ k2 = 0 ω →    −ipTI , tcool short ±N − ipTI 2 , tcool long
  10. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion How Does ￿ermal

    Instability Saturate? (Assuming it exists…) HQ; 10 (ρ/ρ0 ) xf> t+QQH/t77 = 1/10 tf> −R y R y R k j −k −R y R HQ; 10 (ρ/ρ0 ) xf> t+QQH/t77 = 10 tf> −R y R y R k j −R.y −y.8 y.y ￿ermal Instability does not necessarily imply Multi-phase gas.
  11. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion How Does ￿ermal

    Instability Saturate? (Assuming it exists…) HQ; 10 (ρ/ρ0 ) xf> t+QQH/t77 = 1/10 tf> −R y R y R k j −k −R y R HQ; 10 (ρ/ρ0 ) xf> t+QQH/t77 = 10 tf> −R y R y R k j −R.y −y.8 y.y ￿ermal Instability does not necessarily imply Multi-phase gas. See cold gas when tcool /tff ￿ 10
  12. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Quantifying the Saturation

    t/tTI ￿δρ/ρ￿rms 0 5 10 15 10 −3 10 −2 10 −1 1 10 Linear Theory tTI/tff = 1/10 tTI/tff = 1 tTI/tff = 10 ￿ Perturbations initially grow exponentially… ￿ …but saturate at an amplitude ∝ (tcool /tff) −1 ￿ ￿is is a non-linear effect
  13. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Quantifying the Saturation

    t/tTI ￿δρ/ρ￿rms 0 5 10 15 10 −3 10 −2 10 −1 1 10 Linear Theory tTI/tff = 1/10 tTI/tff = 1 tTI/tff = 10 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ tti/tff ￿δρ/ρ￿rms 10 −1 1 10 10 −2 10 −1 1 10
  14. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Physics of the

    Saturation “Sinking Blobs” model (i. e. no buoyancy) Long cooling-time limit: δρ/ρ ￿ 1 What stops the instability? One possibility: sinking blobs mix into surroundings g t Joung et al. 2011
  15. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Physics of the

    Saturation “Sinking Blobs” model (i. e. no buoyancy) Assume blobs survive for ∼ one scale-height: tsink ∼ H vsink + Archimedes’ principle: dv dt ∼ δρ ρ g ∼ vsink tsink ∼ v2 sink H + steady-state: t−1 cool ∼ t−1 sink g t Joung et al. 2011
  16. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Physics of the

    Saturation “Sinking Blobs” model (i. e. no buoyancy) ⇒ δρ ρ ∼ ￿ tcool tff ￿−2 too steep! g t Joung et al. 2011
  17. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Physics of the

    Saturation “Sinking Blobs” model (i. e. no buoyancy) thA/t77 = 10 xf> −k −R y R k j −R.y −y.8 y.y thA/t77 = 3 −R.yy −y.d8 −y.8y −y.k8 thA/t77 = 1 −R.yy −y.d8 −y.8y −y.k8 thA/t77 = 1/10 HQ; 10 (ρ/ρ0 ) −k −R y R xf> tf> −j −k −R y R k j @j @k @R y R k j −y.k y.y y.k tf> −j −k −R y R k j −y.8 y.y y.8 tf> −j −k −R y R k j @RXy yXy RXy δρ/ρ tf> −j −k −R y R k j @RXy yXy RXy Perturbations don’t look like sinking blobs. Buoyancy is probably important.
  18. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Physics of the

    Saturation “Sinking Blobs” model (i. e. no buoyancy) Assume blobs survive for ∼ one scale-height: tsink ∼ H vsink + Archimedes’ principle: dv dt ∼ δρ ρ g ∼ vsink ✞ ✝ ☎ ✆ tsink ∼ v2 sink H + steady-state: t−1 cool ∼ t−1 sink g t Joung et al. 2011
  19. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Physics of the

    Saturation Including buoyancy… “strong” turbulence: tblob ∼ (kvk) −1 momentum equation: dv dt ∼ δρ ρ g ∼ v tbuoy steady state: t−1 cool ∼ t−1 blob thA/t77 = 10 xf> −k −R y R k j −R.y −y.8 y.y thA/t77 = 3 −R.yy −y.d8 −y.8y −y.k8 thA/t77 = 1 −R.yy −y.d8 −y.8y −y.k8 thA/t77 = 1/10 HQ; 10 (ρ/ρ0 ) −k −R y R xf> tf> −j −k −R y R k j @j @k @R y R k j −y.k y.y y.k tf> −j −k −R y R k j −y.8 y.y y.8 tf> −j −k −R y R k j @RXy yXy RXy δρ/ρ tf> −j −k −R y R k j @RXy yXy RXy ⇒ δρ ρ ∼ ￿ tcool tff ￿−1 ￿ tff tbuoy ￿
  20. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Physics of the

    Saturation ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ tti/tff ￿δρ/ρ￿rms 10 −1 1 10 10 −2 10 −1 1 10
  21. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Hα Filaments ✽

    ✽ ✽ ✽ ✽ ✽ ✽ ✽ ✽ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ✽ ▲ r (Mpc) tcool /tff 10 −3 10 −2 10 −1 1 10 10 2 10 3 Extended Hα No Extended Hα min(tcool ) (Gyr) min(tcool /tff ) Abell 133 Abell 478 Abell 496 Sersic 159-03 Abell 1991 Abell 2597 Abell 1795 Hydra A Centaurus Abell 85 Abell 644 Abell 4059 Abell 1650 Abell 2029 Abell 2142 Abell 744 10 −2 10 −1 1 10 1 10 10 2 Extended Hα No Extended Hα x-ray data from the ￿￿￿￿￿￿ catalog (Cavagnolo et al. ￿￿￿￿) Hα data from McDonald et al. (￿￿￿￿, ￿￿￿￿)
  22. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Triggering AGN Feedback

    ￿ermal Instability Develops Cold Gas Accretes Residual Cold Gas No ￿ermal Instability 10 kpc Sharma, McCourt et al. 2012a
  23. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Triggering AGN Feedback

    Feedback and cooling self-regulate to the critical threshold for non-linear thermal stability: min(tcool /tff ) ∼ 10
  24. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Non-Self-Similarity ￿e condition

    min(tcool /tff) ∼ 10 implies a maximum gas density as a function of halo mass. Sharma, McCourt et al. 2012b
  25. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Including Conduction λF

    ∝ (ˆ b ⋅ ˆ k) × (χet￿ɪ )￿￿￿ e 5), to the point where the magnetic pressure n the filaments. The regions over which the ed are coincident with, but significantly longer on of the cold filaments. The field enhancement freezing as the cooling plasma is compressed o the initial field direction in the nonlinear state by contrast, in one at 1.43 Gyr (Figur state in two dimen regions to becom (because of the s 0 x(kpc) t=0.95 Gyr 0 20 40 −1 −0.5 0 x(kpc) z(kpc) t=0.475 Gyr 0 20 40 0 20 40 −0.13 −0.12 −0.11 −0.1 plots of log10 temperature (in keV) for the fiducial run (MWC) at linear (0.475 Gyr; left) he arrows show the magnetic field direction. this figure is available in the online journal.) Sharma et al. 2010 ✽ ✽ ✽ ➙ ➙ ➙ ✽ ➙ ￿ anisotropic isotropic ￿ tχ /tff tTI /tff Cold Fraction (by Mass) 10 −1 1 10 −2 10 −1 1 10 √ 2 √ 2 √ 2/10 10 √ 2 √ 2
  26. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Including Conduction, cont.

    tχ /t77 = ∞ xf> @k @R y R k j tχ /t77 = 10 √ 2 tχ /t77 = √ 2 tχ /t77 = √ 2/4 tχ /t77 = √ 2/10 thA/t77 = 10−0.75 xf> @k @R y R k j thA/t77 = 10−0.25 tf> xf> −j −k −R y R k @j @k @R y R k j tf> −j −k −R y R k tf> −j −k −R y R k tf> −j −k −R y R k tf> thA/t77 = 1 j −j −k −R y R k
  27. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Summary ￿ermal Instability

    ￿ Assuming that the ICM is thermally unstable, multi-phase gas forms only when tcool /tff ￿ 10. ￿ We can understand this threshold in terms of the non-linear saturation of the instability. ￿ Cooling and feedback self-regulate to the threshold for non-linear stability. Applications ￿ermal instability enables us to understand: ￿ Why some clusters show filaments of cool gas while others don’t, ￿ How AGN feedback is triggered/regulated, and ￿ Why the gas profiles in clusters are not self-similar
  28. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Future Directions? Clusters

    ￿ Gravity waves sourced by cooling? Other Objects ￿ Coronae (e. g. in the sun or accretion disks) may also have local thermal instability.
  29. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Atomic Gas in

    Clusters Hydra A Abell ￿￿￿ Abell ￿￿￿￿ McDonald et al. 2010
  30. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Particle Mean Free

    Path Spitzer-Härm collisionless q0 ￿ Bale et al. ￿￿￿￿ ￿ Derived from the ￿￿ electron distribution function measured with the NASA Wind spacecraft.
  31. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Heating Fluctuations thA/t77

    = 10 xf> R k j thA/t77 = 1 thA/t77 = 1/10 6B/m+BH xf> R k j RyyW 6Hm+iX tf> xf> −R y R y R k j tf> −R y R tf> jyyW 6Hm+iX −R y R
  32. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Feedback Regulation Feedback

    and cooling self-regulate to the critical threshold for non-linear thermal stability: min(tcool /tff ) ∼ 10
  33. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion Physics of the

    Saturation Including buoyancy… “weak” turbulence: twave ∼ (kvg) −1 tshear ∼ (kvk) −1 velocity perturbation: ￿ δv v ￿ int ∼ (shear rate) × (int. time) ∼ twave tshear ∼ vk vg ￿ 1 add incoherently: tblob ∼ ￿ vg vk ￿2 twave ￿ twave steady state: t−1 blob ∼ t−1 cool momentum equation: dv dt ∼ δρ ρ g ∼ v tbuoy ⇒ δρ ρ ∼ ￿ tcool tff ￿−1/2 ￿ tff tbuoy ￿3/2
  34. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion MTI Temperature (t

    = 0) Temperature (t = 5 tbuoy) HBI Temperature (t = 5 tbuoy) ∆T
  35. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion t = 0

    t = 4 tbuoy t = 6 tbuoy t = 30 tbuoy t = 0 t = 7.5 tbuoy t = 20 tbuoy t = 40 tbuoy
  36. Introduction ￿ermal Instability Applications Including Conduction Conclusion t = 0

    t = 3 tbuoy t = 12 tbuoy t = 17 tbuoy t = 50 tbuoy Temperature 1.0 1.05