Lock in $30 Savings on PRO—Offer Ends Soon! ⏳
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Tracing for Granularity
Search
JBD
June 02, 2018
Programming
2
1.8k
Tracing for Granularity
JBD
June 02, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by JBD
See All by JBD
eBPF in Microservices Observability at eBPF Day
rakyll
1
2.2k
eBPF in Microservices Observability
rakyll
1
1.7k
OpenTelemetry at AWS
rakyll
1
1.9k
Debugging Code Generation in Go
rakyll
5
1.6k
Are you ready for production?
rakyll
8
2.9k
Servers are doomed to fail
rakyll
3
1.5k
Serverless Containers
rakyll
1
270
Critical Path Analysis
rakyll
0
660
Monitoring and Debugging Containers
rakyll
2
1.1k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
ローターアクトEクラブ アメリカンナイト:川端 柚菜 氏(Japan O.K. ローターアクトEクラブ 会長):2720 Japan O.K. ロータリーEクラブ2025年12月1日卓話
2720japanoke
0
720
エディターってAIで操作できるんだぜ
kis9a
0
700
Building AI Agents with TypeScript #TSKaigiHokuriku
izumin5210
6
1.2k
FluorTracer / RayTracingCamp11
kugimasa
0
220
スタートアップを支える技術戦略と組織づくり
pospome
8
16k
CSC509 Lecture 14
javiergs
PRO
0
220
WebRTC、 綺麗に見るか滑らかに見るか
sublimer
1
160
connect-python: convenient protobuf RPC for Python
anuraaga
0
380
Microservices rules: What good looks like
cer
PRO
0
1.1k
宅宅自以為的浪漫:跟 AI 一起為自己辦的研討會寫一個售票系統
eddie
0
490
React Native New Architecture 移行実践報告
taminif
1
150
これだけで丸わかり!LangChain v1.0 アップデートまとめ
os1ma
6
1.7k
Featured
See All Featured
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
379
70k
Rails Girls Zürich Keynote
gr2m
95
14k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
254
26k
Building Adaptive Systems
keathley
44
2.9k
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
jeffersonlam
355
21k
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
340
57k
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
22k
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
74
19k
Keith and Marios Guide to Fast Websites
keithpitt
413
23k
Evolution of real-time – Irina Nazarova, EuRuKo, 2024
irinanazarova
9
1.1k
Let's Do A Bunch of Simple Stuff to Make Websites Faster
chriscoyier
508
140k
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
73
11k
Transcript
tracing for granularity JBD, Google (@rakyll)
@rakyll
@rakyll tracing? What is tracing and why do we trace?
@rakyll
@rakyll clogged?
@rakyll leaking?
@rakyll path and direction?
@rakyll 100% availability (is a lie)
“ @rakyll A service is available if users cannot tell
there was an outage.
@rakyll Without an SLO, your team has no principled way
of saying what level of downtime is acceptable. • Error rate • Latency or throughput expectations Service Level Objectives (SLOs)
@rakyll 28 ms 100 ms 172 ms 56 ms 356
ms what user sees what else we can see sec.Check auth.AccessToken cache.Lookup spanner.Query GET /messages
@rakyll 182 ms 56 ms 245 ms what user sees
what else we can see sec.Check auth.AccessToken GET /messages 7 ms cache.Lookup
@rakyll latency...
@rakyll Go is the language to write servers. Many runtime
activities occur during the program execution: • scheduling • memory allocation • garbage collection Hard to associate a request with its impact on the runtime.
@rakyll clogged?
“ @rakyll There is no easy way to tell why
latency is high for certain requests. Is it due to GC, scheduler or syscalls? Can you review the code and tell us why? -SRE
@rakyll Execution tracer $ go tool trace • Reports fine-grained
runtime events in the lifetime of a goroutine. • Reports utilization of CPU cores. But cannot easily tell how handling a request impacts the runtime.
@rakyll 28 ms 100 ms 172 ms 56 ms 356
ms GET /messages auth.AccessToken cache.Lookup spanner.Query GET /messages
@rakyll 5 68µs 8 123µs networking serialization + deserialization garbage
collection blocking syscall what actually happens 172 ms auth.AccessToken
@rakyll 5 68µs 8 123µs epoll executing sys gc netwrite
@rakyll How? • Mark sections in code using runtime/trace. •
Enable execution tracer temporarily and record data. • Examine the recorded data.
@rakyll Go 1.11 introduces... • User regions, tasks and annotations.
• Association between user code and runtime. • Association with distributed traces.
@rakyll Go 1.11 runtime/trace import “runtime/trace” ctx, task := trace.NewTask(ctx,
“myHandler”) defer task.End() // Handler code here....
@rakyll region #1 task #1 Go 1.11 runtime/trace region #2
region #3 region #4 region #5 goroutine #1 goroutine #4 goroutine #5
@rakyll import _ "net/http/pprof" go func() { log.Println(http.ListenAndServe("localhost:6060", nil)) }()
@rakyll $ curl http://server:6060/debug/pprof/trace?seconds=5 -o trace.out $ go tool trace
trace.out 2018/05/04 10:39:59 Parsing trace... 2018/05/04 10:39:59 Splitting trace... 2018/05/04 10:39:59 Opening browser. Trace viewer is listening on http://127.0.0.1:51803
Execution tracer tasks for RPCs (/usertasks)
Execution tracer tasks for RPCs (/usertasks)
RPCs overlapping with garbage collection
Execution tracer regions (/userregions)
Region summary for conn.ready
@rakyll Record in production $ curl http://server/debug/pprof/trace?seconds=5 -o trace.out $
go tool trace trace.out
@rakyll Try It! Install the Go 1.11 beta1! golang.org/dl
@rakyll $ go get go.opencensus.io/trace import rt “runtime/trace” ctx, span
:= trace.StartSpan(ctx, “/messages”) defer span.End() rt.WithRegion(ctx, “foo”, func(ctx) { // Do something... })
@rakyll Limitations • Execution tracer cannot do accounting for cross-goroutine
operations automatically. • Exposition format is hard to parse if `go trace tool` is not used.
thank you! JBD, Google
[email protected]
@rakyll