Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Tracing for Granularity
Search
JBD
June 02, 2018
Programming
1.8k
2
Share
Tracing for Granularity
JBD
June 02, 2018
More Decks by JBD
See All by JBD
eBPF in Microservices Observability at eBPF Day
rakyll
1
2.2k
eBPF in Microservices Observability
rakyll
1
1.8k
OpenTelemetry at AWS
rakyll
1
1.9k
Debugging Code Generation in Go
rakyll
5
1.6k
Are you ready for production?
rakyll
8
2.9k
Servers are doomed to fail
rakyll
3
1.6k
Serverless Containers
rakyll
1
290
Critical Path Analysis
rakyll
0
700
Monitoring and Debugging Containers
rakyll
2
1.1k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
【26新卒研修資料】TDD実装演習
dip_tech
PRO
0
120
書籍「ユーザーストーリーマッピング」が私のバイブル
asumikam
4
440
AIを導入する前にやるべきこと
negima
2
300
Making the RBS Parser Faster
soutaro
0
580
Vibe NLP for Applied NLP
inesmontani
PRO
0
510
Offline should be the norm: building local-first apps with CRDTs & Kotlin Multiplatform
renaudmathieu
0
230
レガシーPHP転生 〜父がドメインエキスパートだったのでDDD+Claude Codeでチート開発します〜
panda_program
0
1.1k
Lightning-Fast Method Calls with Ruby 4.1 ZJIT / RubyKaigi 2026
k0kubun
3
1.8k
How We Benchmarked Quarkus: Patterns and anti-patterns
hollycummins
1
160
From Formal Specification to Property Based Test
ohbarye
0
450
アーキテクチャモダナイゼーションとは何か
nwiizo
19
5.5k
2026_04_15_量子計算をパズルとして解く
hideakitakechi
0
120
Featured
See All Featured
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1032
470k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
225
10k
Designing for Timeless Needs
cassininazir
0
210
Building Better People: How to give real-time feedback that sticks.
wjessup
370
20k
Paper Plane
katiecoart
PRO
1
49k
[Rails World 2023 - Day 1 Closing Keynote] - The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
38
2.8k
The SEO identity crisis: Don't let AI make you average
varn
0
450
Claude Code どこまでも/ Claude Code Everywhere
nwiizo
65
55k
RailsConf 2023
tenderlove
30
1.4k
The Anti-SEO Checklist Checklist. Pubcon Cyber Week
ryanjones
0
130
CSS Pre-Processors: Stylus, Less & Sass
bermonpainter
360
30k
JavaScript: Past, Present, and Future - NDC Porto 2020
reverentgeek
52
5.9k
Transcript
tracing for granularity JBD, Google (@rakyll)
@rakyll
@rakyll tracing? What is tracing and why do we trace?
@rakyll
@rakyll clogged?
@rakyll leaking?
@rakyll path and direction?
@rakyll 100% availability (is a lie)
“ @rakyll A service is available if users cannot tell
there was an outage.
@rakyll Without an SLO, your team has no principled way
of saying what level of downtime is acceptable. • Error rate • Latency or throughput expectations Service Level Objectives (SLOs)
@rakyll 28 ms 100 ms 172 ms 56 ms 356
ms what user sees what else we can see sec.Check auth.AccessToken cache.Lookup spanner.Query GET /messages
@rakyll 182 ms 56 ms 245 ms what user sees
what else we can see sec.Check auth.AccessToken GET /messages 7 ms cache.Lookup
@rakyll latency...
@rakyll Go is the language to write servers. Many runtime
activities occur during the program execution: • scheduling • memory allocation • garbage collection Hard to associate a request with its impact on the runtime.
@rakyll clogged?
“ @rakyll There is no easy way to tell why
latency is high for certain requests. Is it due to GC, scheduler or syscalls? Can you review the code and tell us why? -SRE
@rakyll Execution tracer $ go tool trace • Reports fine-grained
runtime events in the lifetime of a goroutine. • Reports utilization of CPU cores. But cannot easily tell how handling a request impacts the runtime.
@rakyll 28 ms 100 ms 172 ms 56 ms 356
ms GET /messages auth.AccessToken cache.Lookup spanner.Query GET /messages
@rakyll 5 68µs 8 123µs networking serialization + deserialization garbage
collection blocking syscall what actually happens 172 ms auth.AccessToken
@rakyll 5 68µs 8 123µs epoll executing sys gc netwrite
@rakyll How? • Mark sections in code using runtime/trace. •
Enable execution tracer temporarily and record data. • Examine the recorded data.
@rakyll Go 1.11 introduces... • User regions, tasks and annotations.
• Association between user code and runtime. • Association with distributed traces.
@rakyll Go 1.11 runtime/trace import “runtime/trace” ctx, task := trace.NewTask(ctx,
“myHandler”) defer task.End() // Handler code here....
@rakyll region #1 task #1 Go 1.11 runtime/trace region #2
region #3 region #4 region #5 goroutine #1 goroutine #4 goroutine #5
@rakyll import _ "net/http/pprof" go func() { log.Println(http.ListenAndServe("localhost:6060", nil)) }()
@rakyll $ curl http://server:6060/debug/pprof/trace?seconds=5 -o trace.out $ go tool trace
trace.out 2018/05/04 10:39:59 Parsing trace... 2018/05/04 10:39:59 Splitting trace... 2018/05/04 10:39:59 Opening browser. Trace viewer is listening on http://127.0.0.1:51803
Execution tracer tasks for RPCs (/usertasks)
Execution tracer tasks for RPCs (/usertasks)
RPCs overlapping with garbage collection
Execution tracer regions (/userregions)
Region summary for conn.ready
@rakyll Record in production $ curl http://server/debug/pprof/trace?seconds=5 -o trace.out $
go tool trace trace.out
@rakyll Try It! Install the Go 1.11 beta1! golang.org/dl
@rakyll $ go get go.opencensus.io/trace import rt “runtime/trace” ctx, span
:= trace.StartSpan(ctx, “/messages”) defer span.End() rt.WithRegion(ctx, “foo”, func(ctx) { // Do something... })
@rakyll Limitations • Execution tracer cannot do accounting for cross-goroutine
operations automatically. • Exposition format is hard to parse if `go trace tool` is not used.
thank you! JBD, Google
[email protected]
@rakyll