Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
How we built an AI code reviewer with serverles...
Search
Sponsored
·
SiteGround - Reliable hosting with speed, security, and support you can count on.
→
Yan Cui
February 12, 2025
Technology
0
160
How we built an AI code reviewer with serverless and Bedrock
Slides for my talk at the Serverless London meetup on 12-Feb-2025
Yan Cui
February 12, 2025
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Yan Cui
See All by Yan Cui
Money-saving tips for the frugal serverless developer (AWS Community Summit)
theburningmonk
1
220
Money-saving tips for the frugal serverless developer
theburningmonk
1
810
Why the fuzz about serverless (with CompassDigital)
theburningmonk
0
120
Money-saving tips for the frugal serverless developer
theburningmonk
0
160
Efficient patterns for serverless development (AWS Summit London)
theburningmonk
0
170
7 ways to solve Lambda cold starts
theburningmonk
0
76
Saving Money on Serverless: Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
theburningmonk
0
77
3 Ways to Improve Serverless Performance
theburningmonk
0
59
Smart and efficient ways to test serverless architectures
theburningmonk
1
300
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
非同期・イベント駆動処理の分散トレーシングの繋げ方
ichikawaken
1
160
スケーリングを封じられたEC2を救いたい
senseofunity129
0
110
私がよく使うMCPサーバー3選と社内で安全に活用する方法
kintotechdev
0
130
Sansanの認証基盤を支えるアーキテクチャとその振り返り
sansantech
PRO
1
110
TUNA Camp 2026 京都Stage ヒューリスティックアルゴリズム入門
terryu16
0
580
QA組織のAI戦略とAIテスト設計システムAITASの実践
sansantech
PRO
1
210
ハーネスエンジニアリング×AI適応開発
aictokamiya
1
460
DMBOKを使ってレバレジーズのデータマネジメントを評価した
leveragestech
0
440
Navigation APIと見るSvelteKitのWeb標準志向
yamanoku
2
120
昔話で振り返るAWSの歩み ~S3誕生から20年、クラウドはどう進化したのか~
nrinetcom
PRO
0
110
AgentCoreとLINEを使った飲食店おすすめアプリを作ってみた
yakumo
2
260
AI時代のオンプレ-クラウドキャリアチェンジ考
yuu0w0yuu
0
520
Featured
See All Featured
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
24
4k
The World Runs on Bad Software
bkeepers
PRO
72
12k
Keith and Marios Guide to Fast Websites
keithpitt
413
23k
Data-driven link building: lessons from a $708K investment (BrightonSEO talk)
szymonslowik
1
990
Building Experiences: Design Systems, User Experience, and Full Site Editing
marktimemedia
0
460
Thoughts on Productivity
jonyablonski
75
5.1k
CSS Pre-Processors: Stylus, Less & Sass
bermonpainter
360
30k
How to Align SEO within the Product Triangle To Get Buy-In & Support - #RIMC
aleyda
1
1.5k
KATA
mclloyd
PRO
35
15k
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
pedronauck
666
130k
Gemini Prompt Engineering: Practical Techniques for Tangible AI Outcomes
mfonobong
2
330
The Impact of AI in SEO - AI Overviews June 2024 Edition
aleyda
5
780
Transcript
How we built an AI Code Reviewer with Serverless and
Bedrock
Yan Cui http://theburningmonk.com @theburningmonk AWS user since 2010
Yan Cui http://theburningmonk.com @theburningmonk running serverless in production since 2016
Developer Advocate @ Yan Cui http://theburningmonk.com @theburningmonk
Yan Cui http://theburningmonk.com @theburningmonk independent consultant
None
evolua.io Demo
Architecture
API Gateway EventBridge Webhook
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook evolua.io
None
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook AppSync evolua.io
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook AppSync evolua.io
None
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook AppSync evolua.io Authoriser
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook AppSync evolua.io Authoriser
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook AppSync evolua.io Authoriser
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook AppSync evolua.io Authoriser
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook AppSync evolua.io Authoriser
Challenges (for an AI code reviewer) Handling sensitive data for
customers
Challenges (for an AI code reviewer) Large fi les. Large
PRs with many fi les. Handling sensitive data for customers
Why Bedrock?
Security
Security Data is encrypted at rest.
www.wiz.io/blog/wiz-research-uncovers-exposed-deepseek-database-leak
aws.amazon.com/bedrock/faqs
Security Data is encrypted at rest. Inputs & Outputs are
not shared with model providers. Inputs & Outputs are not used to train other models.
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook AppSync evolua.io Authoriser Fallback
Primary
privacy.anthropic.com/en/articles/7996885-how-do-you-use-personal-data-in-model-training
Serverless
Serverless Usage-based AND provisioned throughput pricing
None
None
1M Input Tokens 1M Output Tokens $0.14 v3 r1 $0.28
$0.55 $2.19 Sonnet $3.75 $15.0 Haiku $0.80 $4.00
Very cost ef fi cient!
Very cost ef fi cient! Data is stored in China.
Very cost ef fi cient! Data is stored in China.
Data might be used to train other models.
www.wiz.io/blog/wiz-research-uncovers-exposed-deepseek-database-leak
Very cost ef fi cient! Data is stored in China.
Data might be used to train other models. Operationally immature.
None
No token-based pricing yet
No token-based pricing yet “GPU-based instance type like ml.p5e.48xlarge is
recommended”
ml.p5e.48xlarge 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰
Other capabilities Guardrails Knowledge base (managed RAG) Agents Cross-region inference
Model evaluations
None
None
None
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook AppSync evolua.io Authoriser Fallback
Primary
Lessons
Webhook
Webhook Analyse changes
Webhook Analyse changes Feedback
Condensed view…
None
Lambda timed out after 15 mins
Succeeded on automatic retry
Webhook Analyse changes Feedback LLM limits GitHub limits AWS limits
Lesson: AI is 10% of the problem
None
Reasoning ability
Context window Max response tokens API rate limit Reasoning ability
Context window Max response tokens API rate limit Reasoning ability
Cost Performance
Context window Max response tokens API rate limit Reasoning ability
Cost Performance Important selection criteria for LLMs
Doing cool AI stuff! Working around AI limits
Doing cool AI stuff! Working around AI limits Stop playing
with my bowl…
Context window Max response tokens API rate limit Reasoning ability
Cost Performance
Claude 3.5 Sonnet’s default throughput is 50 per minute
Claude 3.5 Sonnet’s default throughput is 50 per minute Can
be raised to 1,000 per minute
Claude 3.5 Sonnet’s default throughput is 50 per minute Can
be raised to 1,000 per minute Bedrock has cross- region inference
Mitigate API rate limit Raise account limits. Use Bedrock cross-region
inference.
Mitigate API rate limit Raise account limits. Use Bedrock cross-region
inference. Limit no. of parallel requests per PR.
Mitigate API rate limit Raise account limits. Use Bedrock cross-region
inference. Limit no. of parallel requests per PR. Fallback to Anthropic & less powerful models (Claude 3 Sonnet, Claude 3.5 Haiku)
Future work: incorporate other models (Nova, DeepSeek, etc.)
Future work: incorporate other models (Nova, DeepSeek, etc.) Also good
for cost control!
Lesson: LLMs are still quite expensive
None
Dif fi cult to build a sustainable and competitive business
Cost control Only analyse changed lines.
Cost control Only analyse changed lines. Good for cost control
Good for UX
Cost control Only analyse changed lines. Limit free users to
few PRs per month.
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook
API Gateway DynamoDB Bedrock EventBridge Webhook Built-in retries & DLQ
Lambda timed out after 15 mins
Lambda timed out after 15 mins Reprocess fi les on
retry…
Lambda timed out after 15 mins Reprocess fi les on
retry… Duplicated side- effects (e.g. Github comments)
Cost control Only analyse changed lines. Limit free users to
few PRs per month. Use checkpoints to avoid re-processing fi les on retries
const issues = await executeIdempotently( `${event-id}-${filename}-analyze`, () => analyzeFile(file) );
... await executeIdempotently( `${event-id}-${filename}-add-gh-comment`, () => addReviewComment(filename, comment) );
Webhook Analyse changes Feedback Why not Step Functions?
Webhook Analyse changes Feedback Why not Step Functions? Checkpoints is
just easier 🤷
Lesson: Latency is a challenge
Models take 10s of seconds to analyse each fi le
Wasted CPU cycles in Lambda
Future work: try other models
Future work: make use of these CPU cycles
Lesson: Be ware of hallucinations
“Give me JSON in this format”
None
“Give me JSON in this format” “Nope!”
None
Non-existent codes, invalid URLs
Non-existent line numbers
Future works
Go to evolua.io to try it out. We’d love your
feedback!
Questions?