Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Kubernetes Controllers - are they loops or events?
Search
Tim Hockin
February 20, 2021
Technology
11
3.8k
Kubernetes Controllers - are they loops or events?
Tim Hockin
February 20, 2021
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Tim Hockin
See All by Tim Hockin
Kubernetes in the 2nd Decade
thockin
0
310
Why Service is the worst API in Kubernetes, and what we can do about it
thockin
2
810
Kubernetes Pod Probes
thockin
6
4.2k
Go Workspaces for Kubernetes
thockin
2
990
Code Review in Kubernetes
thockin
2
1.7k
Multi-cluster: past, present, future
thockin
0
460
Kubernetes Network Models (why is this so dang hard?)
thockin
9
1.8k
KubeCon EU 2020: SIG-Network Intro and Deep-Dive
thockin
8
1.3k
A Non-Technical Kubernetes Talk (KubeCon EU 2020)
thockin
3
580
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
オブザーバビリティの観点でみるAWS / AWS from observability perspective
ymotongpoo
8
1.5k
人はなぜISUCONに夢中になるのか
kakehashi
PRO
6
1.7k
株式会社EventHub・エンジニア採用資料
eventhub
0
4.3k
AndroidデバイスにFTPサーバを建立する
e10dokup
0
250
ホワイトボードチャレンジ 説明&実行資料
ichimichi
0
130
Goで作って学ぶWebSocket
ryuichi1208
1
1k
エンジニアのためのドキュメント力基礎講座〜構造化思考から始めよう〜(2025/02/15jbug広島#15発表資料)
yasuoyasuo
17
6.8k
現場で役立つAPIデザイン
nagix
33
12k
Amazon S3 Tablesと外部分析基盤連携について / Amazon S3 Tables and External Data Analytics Platform
nttcom
0
140
SA Night #2 FinatextのSA思想/SA Night #2 Finatext session
satoshiimai
1
140
管理者しか知らないOutlookの裏側のAIを覗く#AzureTravelers
hirotomotaguchi
2
430
Data-centric AI入門第6章:Data-centric AIの実践例
x_ttyszk
1
410
Featured
See All Featured
The Power of CSS Pseudo Elements
geoffreycrofte
75
5.5k
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
eileencodes
133
33k
Fontdeck: Realign not Redesign
paulrobertlloyd
83
5.4k
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
376
70k
JavaScript: Past, Present, and Future - NDC Porto 2020
reverentgeek
47
5.2k
Let's Do A Bunch of Simple Stuff to Make Websites Faster
chriscoyier
507
140k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
93
6.2k
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
47
7.3k
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
PRO
656
59k
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
176
9.5k
The Illustrated Children's Guide to Kubernetes
chrisshort
48
49k
Thoughts on Productivity
jonyablonski
69
4.5k
Transcript
Kubernetes Controllers Are they loops or events? Tim Hockin @thockin
v1
Background on “reconciliation”: https://speakerdeck.com/thockin/kubernetes-what-is-reconciliation
Background on “edge vs. level”: https://speakerdeck.com/thockin/edge-vs-level-triggered-logic
Usually when we talk about controllers we refer to them
as a “loop”
Imagine a controller for Pods (aka kubelet). It has 2
jobs: 1) Actuate the pod API 2) Report status on pods
What you’d expect looks something like:
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c Get all pods
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c { name: a,
... } { name: b, ... } { name: c, ... }
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c for each pod
p { if p is running { verify p config } else { start p } gather status }
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c Set status c
a b
...then repeat (aka “a poll loop”)
Here’s where it matters
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c c a b
kubectl delete pod b
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet c c a b kubectl
delete pod b
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet c Get all pods c
a b
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet c { name: a, ...
} { name: c, ... } c a b
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet c I have “b” but
API doesn’t - delete it! c a b
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet c Set status c a
This is correct level-triggered reconciliation Read desired state, make it
so
Some controllers are implemented this way, but it’s inefficient at
scale
Imagine thousands of controllers (kubelet, kube-proxy, dns, ingress, storage...) polling
continuously
We need to achieve the same behavior more efficiently
We could poll less often, but then it takes a
long (and variable) time to react - not a great UX
Enter the “list-watch” model
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c Get all pods
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c { name: a,
... } { name: b, ... } { name: c, ... }
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c Cache: { name:
a, ... } { name: b, ... } { name: c, ... }
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c Watch all pods
Cache: { name: a, ... } { name: b, ... } { name: c, ... }
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c Cache: { name:
a, ... } { name: b, ... } { name: c, ... } for each pod p { if p is running { verify p config } else { start p } gather status }
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c Set status c
a b Cache: { name: a, ... } { name: b, ... } { name: c, ... }
We trade memory (the cache) for other resources (API server
CPU in particular)
There’s no point in polling my own cache, so what
happens next?
Remember that watch we did earlier? That’s an open stream
for events.
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet b c c a b
kubectl delete pod b Cache: { name: a, ... } { name: b, ... } { name: c, ... }
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet c c a b kubectl
delete pod b Cache: { name: a, ... } { name: b, ... } { name: c, ... }
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet c Delete: { name: b,
... } c a b Cache: { name: a, ... } { name: b, ... } { name: c, ... }
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet c Delete: { name: b,
... } c a b Cache: { name: a, ... } { name: c, ... }
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet c Cache: { name: a,
... } { name: c, ... } c a b API said to delete pod “b”.
Node Kubernetes API a kubelet c Cache: { name: a,
... } { name: c, ... } c a API said to delete pod “b”.
“But you said edge-triggered is bad!”
It is! But this isn’t edge-triggered.
The cache is updated by events (edges) but we are
still reconciling state
“???”
The controller can be restarted at any time and the
cache will be reconstructed - we can’t “miss an edge*” * modulo bugs, read on
Even if you miss an event, you can still recover
the state
Ultimately it’s all just software, and software has bugs. Controllers
should re-list periodically to get full state...
...but we’ve put a lot of energy into making sure
that our list-watch is reliable.