Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Differential Frequency Dependent Delay from the Pulsar Magnetosphere

transientskp
December 05, 2012

Differential Frequency Dependent Delay from the Pulsar Magnetosphere

Tom Hassall

transientskp

December 05, 2012
Tweet

More Decks by transientskp

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. Tom Hassall
    and the LOFAR Pulsar Working Group
    Differential
    Frequency-dependent Delay from the
    Pulsar Magnetosphere

    View Slide

  2. Pulsars
    • Neutron star
    • ...with a very strong
    magnetic field
    • ...which rips particles
    from the surface of the
    star and accelerates them
    • The accelerated charges
    produce a beam of radio
    emission
    • As the star rotates the
    beam sweeps around the
    sky like a lighthouse
    Magnetic Axis
    Open Magnetic
    Field Lines
    Closed Magnetic
    Field Lines
    Radio Beam
    Rotation Axis
    Magneto-
    sphere
    Light Cylinder
    1 1.5 2 2.5 3
    Time (s)
    4e+07
    0
    1e+07
    2e+07
    3e+07
    4e+07
    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
    Relative Amplitude
    Time (s)
    Time

    View Slide

  3. Not to scale!
    Magnetosphere
    Rotation
    axis
    Magnetic
    axis
    Pulsar
    Radio Frequency
    Image credit: Hessels
    Radius-to-Frequency
    Mapping

    View Slide

  4. PSR B0809+74
    Starts
    broad
    Gets
    narrower
    Broadens
    again
    But this
    happens in a
    very smooth
    way
    Looks like one
    component is
    moving and one
    is fixed
    Hassall et al 2012

    View Slide

  5. • Profile evolution cannot be explained by simple RFM
    • What is the pulse profile? Why does it change with
    frequency?
    • Best theory: Birefringence
    • Different propagation modes through the
    magnetosphere
    • Emission all comes from a narrow height range and
    propagation effects cause the profile to change shape
    (Beskin & Philippov 2011)
    • One component is refracted, and one is not
    What is going on?

    View Slide

  6. PSR B0809+74
    • Bright
    • Slow (P ~1.29s)
    • Nearby
    • Lots of interesting features including
    “drifting subpulses”

    View Slide

  7. Drifting Subpulses
    1.5 2 2.5 3
    ime (s)
    1.5 2 2.5 3
    ime (s)
    2 2.5 3
    s)
    2 2.5 3
    s)
    0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
    Time (s)
    0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
    Time (s)
    1 1.5 2 2.5 3
    Time (s)
    1 1.5 2 2.5 3
    Time (s)
    0
    +07
    +07
    +07
    +07
    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
    Time (s)
    0
    +07
    +07
    +07
    +07
    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
    Time (s)
    0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
    Time (s)
    0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
    Time (s)
    P3
    P2

    View Slide

  8. Carousel
    Pulsar
    Spark
    Carousel
    Line-of-sight

    View Slide

  9. Pulsar
    Surface Oscillations
    Line-of-sight

    View Slide

  10. Subpulse Phase Tracks

    View Slide

  11. Phase-step
    Edwards & Stappers 2003
    • This can be explained by the surface
    oscillation model by the presence of a
    “nodal line” (Clemens & Rosen 2004,
    2008; Rosen & Demorest 2011)
    • Area on the NS surface which does
    not move
    • But if this is the case, we expect a
    sudden frequency onset of the phase-
    step
    • It is either in the line-of-sight or it
    isn’t

    View Slide

  12. Different
    Frequencies
    • Gradual onset of the phase-step
    • Surface oscillation model
    predicts a discrete step
    • NOT a nodal line
    • What is it?

    View Slide

  13. Folded
    Pulse Stacks
    • At the lowest frequencies
    there are 2 separate sets
    of driftbands
    • One stays in the same
    position
    • The other moves relative
    to it
    • At ~300MHz they overlap

    View Slide

  14. Interesting
    Consequences...
    • Centroid of the moving
    driftband suffers a
    ~30-pulse delay
    • Overlapping region is
    where supulse phase
    step occurs
    • This could be linked
    narrow-band pulses
    (see Vlad’s talk)

    View Slide

  15. Conclusions
    • Subpulse phase-step and asymmetric profile
    evolution can be explained by two
    driftbands which suffer differential
    frequency-dependent delay
    • BUT what causes this?
    • Is B0809+74 a special case?

    View Slide

  16. Cycle 0 Proposal
    • Observe 14 pulsars which exhibit similar features
    • Study their single pulse properties
    • Polarisation data
    - New information
    • New 8-bit mode
    - Double the bandwidth
    • Coherent sum of the 40 core stations
    - 3x sensitivity

    View Slide



  17. Is this slide still necessary Rene?

    View Slide