When Microservices Meet Real-World Projects @ GOTOber

https://www.innoq.com/en/talks/2015/12/goto-berlin-2015-microservices-real-word-projects-devops/

Transcript

2. MicroServices meet Real World projects #gotober #innoQ www.innoQ.com
3. MicroServices meet Real World projects #gotober #innoQ www.innoQ.com
4. Alexander Heusingfeld alexander.heusingfeld@innoq.com Senior Consultant @ innoQ @goldstift
5. Architecture Consulting...
6. “We’d like to have a microservice architecture!” — Customer X
7. When reviewing a monolithic application … © innoQ/Roman Stranghöner
8. …and taking a look into the black box… © innoQ/Roman Stranghöner
9. …you’ll likely find it consists of multiple Bounded Contexts. © innoQ/Roman Stranghöner
10. If you cut a monolithic system along its very domains …
11. … and wrap every domain in a separate, replaceable web application …
12. … then that application can be referred to as a self- contained system (SCS).
13. http://scs-architecture.org/ more information on self-contained systems (SCS) can be found at #gotober #innoQ
14. Architectural Decisions
15. Architectural Decisions > Domain Architecture
16. Architectural Decisions > Domain Architecture > Macro Architecture
17. Architectural Decisions > Domain Architecture > Macro Architecture > Micro Architecture
18. Isn't there more than that…
19. At a project meeting…
20. Did you think about the people 
 who make your architecture exist?
21. us vs. them
22. “Don’t care about this, it’s our business!” “Alarming is our concern, don’t bother about it!” “No need for a discussion, we always fix that during deployment.” “That’s part of the handover to operations.”
23. overcome “us vs. them”
24. overcome “us vs. them” > cross-functional != cross-department
25. overcome “us vs. them” > cross-functional != cross-department > have one manager to decide on a team’s targets
26. overcome “us vs. them” > cross-functional != cross-department > have one manager to decide on a team’s targets > don’t neglect team-building
27. overcome “us vs. them” > cross-functional != cross-department > have one manager to decide on a team’s targets > don’t neglect team-building > trust is not optional
28. well-known pros are subjective
29. “Operating a monolith is easier!”
30. Of course it’s easier…
31. It’s always easier… …if the complexity is on someone else’s desk.
32. “Operational costs are increased!”
33. Monolith
34. Microservices?
35. Microservices? A broken Monolith?!
36. “Separating teams duplicates work!”
37. The manageable, domain specific scope enables the development, operation and maintenance of an SCS by an autonomous team. Team 1 Team 2 Team 3
38. share ideas share concepts don’t share functional code Team 1 Team 2 Team 3
39. “Deployments cannot be faster, 
 we have an established process!”
43. What this taught us
44. What this taught us > enable fast feedback for your team
45. What this taught us > enable fast feedback for your team > automate what’s next to you first
46. What this taught us > enable fast feedback for your team > automate what’s next to you first > do your homework before you teach others
47. What this taught us > enable fast feedback for your team > automate what’s next to you first > do your homework before you teach others > other people will notice the benefits
48. What this taught us > enable fast feedback for your team > automate what’s next to you first > do your homework before you teach others > other people will notice the benefits > complex processes can be adopted, divide them and take one step at a time
49. “pets vs. cattle”
50. https://www.flickr.com/photos/cornelii/531691572 https://www.flickr.com/photos/cornelii/531691572
51. https://www.flickr.com/photos/cornelii/531691572 https://www.flickr.com/photos/cornelii/531691572
52. summarized: change perspectives!
55. http://izismile.com/2013/01/22/buyers_beware_its_a_matter_of_perspective_3_pics.html
56. A company which embraced and evolved
57. http://projectcartoon.com/cartoon/1
58. Modernisation Strategies
59. Big Bang
60. Change via Copy
61. Change via Extraction
62. Strangulate Bad Parts
63. http://aim42.org/ more information on software modernisation 
 can be found at #gotober #innoQ
64. conclusion
65. Conway’s Law “Organizations which design systems are constrained to produce systems which are copies of the communication structures of these organizations.” – M.E. Conway Organization ˠ Architecture
66. Summary #gotober #innoQ
67. Summary > distributed systems are hard - organizational impact, too #gotober #innoQ
68. Summary > distributed systems are hard - organizational impact, too > don't forget: there's always at least one other perspective #gotober #innoQ
69. Summary > distributed systems are hard - organizational impact, too > don't forget: there's always at least one other perspective > Don’t overwhelm people, change one thing at a time #gotober #innoQ
70. Summary > distributed systems are hard - organizational impact, too > don't forget: there's always at least one other perspective > Don’t overwhelm people, change one thing at a time > not everyone who wants microservices is immediately capable to establish them #gotober #innoQ
71. Thank you! Questions?
    Comments? Alexander Heusingfeld | @goldstift alexander.heusingfeld@innoq.com innoQ Deutschland GmbH Krischerstr. 100 40789 Monheim am Rhein Germany Phone: +49 2173 3366-0 innoQ Schweiz GmbH Gewerbestr. 11 CH-6330 Cham Switzerland Phone: +41 41 743 0116 www.innoq.com Ohlauer Straße 43 10999 Berlin Germany Ludwigstraße 180 E D-63067 Offenbach Germany Kreuzstr. 16 D-80331 München Germany https://www.innoq.com/en/timeline/?tag=scs #gotober #innoQ