Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Scaling Django with Distributed Systems
Search
Andrew Godwin
April 07, 2017
Programming
3
2k
Scaling Django with Distributed Systems
A talk I gave at PyCon Ukraine 2017.
Andrew Godwin
April 07, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Godwin
See All by Andrew Godwin
Reconciling Everything
andrewgodwin
1
230
Django Through The Years
andrewgodwin
0
110
Writing Maintainable Software At Scale
andrewgodwin
0
350
A Newcomer's Guide To Airflow's Architecture
andrewgodwin
0
270
Async, Python, and the Future
andrewgodwin
2
560
How To Break Django: With Async
andrewgodwin
1
610
Taking Django's ORM Async
andrewgodwin
0
620
The Long Road To Asynchrony
andrewgodwin
0
540
The Scientist & The Engineer
andrewgodwin
1
630
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
初心者がおさえておきたいAWS CDKのベストプラクティス 2024
konokenj
15
7.3k
CSC307 Lecture 13
javiergs
PRO
0
150
From Spring Boot 2 to Spring Boot 3 with Java 22 and Jakarta EE
ivargrimstad
0
1.9k
さきがけから振り返るアーキテクチャ刷新 / Reflecting on the Architectural Renewal from the Vanguard
nrslib
2
770
Activities at Cairo Library
cairolibrary720
0
1.2k
ドメイン駆動設計の実践
masuda220
PRO
17
5.1k
AHC035解説
terryu16
0
710
Temporalを取り巻く仕様を整理する
sajikix
0
110
Jetpack for KMP
fornewid
1
290
みんなのオブザーバビリティプラットフォームを作ってるんだがパフォーマンスがやばい #mackerelio #srenext
ne_sachirou
0
370
Terraformテスト入門
msato
0
520
Polarsの成長: v0.14からv1.0までの変遷と今後の展望
zerebom
1
350
Featured
See All Featured
Embracing the Ebb and Flow
colly
81
4.3k
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
eileencodes
129
32k
Rails Girls Zürich Keynote
gr2m
93
13k
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
155
22k
The Language of Interfaces
destraynor
151
23k
Building Flexible Design Systems
yeseniaperezcruz
323
37k
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
25
6.7k
The Success of Rails: Ensuring Growth for the Next 100 Years
eileencodes
35
6.3k
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
17
2.8k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
46
7k
Robots, Beer and Maslow
schacon
PRO
157
8.1k
Why You Should Never Use an ORM
jnunemaker
PRO
51
8.9k
Transcript
None
Andrew Godwin Hi, I'm Django core developer Senior Software Engineer
at Used to complain about migrations a lot
Distributed Systems
c = 299,792,458 m/s
Early CPUs c = 60m propagation distance Clock ~2cm 5
MHz
Modern CPUs c = 10cm propagation distance 3 GHz
Distributed systems are made of independent components
They are slower and harder to write than synchronous systems
But they can be scaled up much, much further
Trade-offs
There is never a perfect solution.
Fast Good Cheap
None
Load Balancer WSGI Worker WSGI Worker WSGI Worker
Load Balancer WSGI Worker WSGI Worker WSGI Worker Cache
Load Balancer WSGI Worker WSGI Worker WSGI Worker Cache Cache
Cache
Load Balancer WSGI Worker WSGI Worker WSGI Worker Database
CAP Theorem
Partition Tolerant Consistent Available
PostgreSQL: CP Consistent everywhere Handles network latency/drops Can't write if
main server is down
Cassandra: AP Can read/write to any node Handles network latency/drops
Data can be inconsistent
It's hard to design a product that might be inconsistent
But if you take the tradeoff, scaling is easy
Otherwise, you must find other solutions
Read Replicas (often called master/slave) Load Balancer WSGI Worker WSGI
Worker WSGI Worker Replica Replica Main
Replicas scale reads forever... But writes must go to one
place
If a request writes to a table it must be
pinned there, so later reads do not get old data
When your write load is too high, you must then
shard
Vertical Sharding Users Tickets Events Payments
Horizontal Sharding Users 0 - 2 Users 3 - 5
Users 6 - 8 Users 9 - A
Both Users 0 - 2 Users 3 - 5 Users
6 - 8 Users 9 - A Events 0 - 2 Events 3 - 5 Events 6 - 8 Events 9 - A Tickets 0 - 2 Tickets 3 - 5 Tickets 6 - 8 Tickets 9 - A
Both plus caching Users 0 - 2 Users 3 -
5 Users 6 - 8 Users 9 - A Events 0 - 2 Events 3 - 5 Events 6 - 8 Events 9 - A Tickets 0 - 2 Tickets 3 - 5 Tickets 6 - 8 Tickets 9 - A User Cache Event Cache Ticket Cache
Teams have to scale too; nobody should have to understand
eveything in a big system.
Services allow complexity to be reduced - for a tradeoff
of speed
Users 0 - 2 Users 3 - 5 Users 6
- 8 Users 9 - A Events 0 - 2 Events 3 - 5 Events 6 - 8 Events 9 - A Tickets 0 - 2 Tickets 3 - 5 Tickets 6 - 8 Tickets 9 - A User Cache Event Cache Ticket Cache User Service Event Service Ticket Service
User Service Event Service Ticket Service WSGI Server
Each service is its own, smaller project, managed and scaled
separately.
But how do you communicate between them?
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Direct Communication
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Service 4 Service 5
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Service 4 Service 5
Service 6 Service 7 Service 8
Service 2 Service 3 Service 1 Message Bus Service 2
Service 3 Service 1
A single point of failure is not always bad -
if the alternative is multiple, fragile ones
Channels and ASGI provide a standard message bus built with
certain tradeoffs
Backing Store e.g. Redis, RabbitMQ ASGI (Channel Layer) Channels Library
Django Django Channels Project
Backing Store e.g. Redis, RabbitMQ ASGI (Channel Layer) Pure Python
Failure Mode At most once Messages either do not arrive,
or arrive once. At least once Messages arrive once, or arrive multiple times
Guarantees vs. Latency Low latency Messages arrive very quickly but
go missing more Low loss rate Messages are almost never lost but arrive slower
Queuing Type First In First Out Consistent performance for all
users First In Last Out Hides backlogs but makes them worse
Queue Sizing Finite Queues Sending can fail Infinite queues Makes
problems even worse
You must understand what you are making (This is surprisingly
uncommon)
Design as much as possible around shared-nothing
Per-machine caches On-demand thumbnailing Signed cookie sessions
Has to be shared? Try to split it
Has to be shared? Try sharding it.
Django's job is to be slowly replaced by your code
Just make sure you match the API contract of what
you're replacing!
Don't try to scale too early; you'll pick the wrong
tradeoffs.
Thanks. Andrew Godwin @andrewgodwin channels.readthedocs.io