PHP Micro framework comparison

PHP Micro frameworks comparison

Transcript

1. MICRO Frameworks Tend to be : • Small • Fast • Easy to use
2. Candidates • Epiphany • Flight • Fat Free • Silex • Slim
3. Epiphany • Pros • Fast • Good API • Modular • HTTP caching • Separate Configuration file • Error Handling • Cons • Weird Code • Not easy to extend
4. Flight • Pros • Fast • Good API • Easy to Extend • Easy to override funcationalities • Error handling • Filtering • Well Documented • Cons : • ?
5. FatFree (F3) • Pros • Relatively fast • Well Documented • Its own unit testing (PHPUnit!?) • Feature-rich • Its own template engine • Built-in ORM • Cons • Not easy to extend • No RegExp Support
6. Silex • Pros • Not very slow ;) • Tons of features (do we realy need?) • Its own Tempate engine (TWIG) • Error Handling • Cons : • Wierd API • Not easy to extend • Huge (Many dependencies) • Is that really micro?
7. Slim • Pros • Good API • Good Documentation • Easy to Extend • Full-Feature • Error Handling • Build-in Logger • Cons : • Very slow
8. Speed Comparison 1000 requests in 10x100 concurrent batches
9. Fasten Your Seat belts ...
10. Winner ? applause
11. Sample Code
12. Question ?