Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Ethical Considerations and Biases in User Experience Research

Ethical Considerations and Biases in User Experience Research

Comfort Ezengwa

October 21, 2023
Tweet

More Decks by Comfort Ezengwa

Other Decks in Research

Transcript

  1. Ethical considerations are principles or guidelines that help ensure responsible

    and moral conduct in various fields, including research, business, healthcare, and more. These considerations are designed to protect the rights, well-being, and interests of individuals, groups, and society as a whole. They provide a framework for making decisions and taking actions that are fair, just, and respectful of ethical values. Definition:
  2. 1. Participant Trust and Cooperation: When participants in UX research

    are treated ethically and respectfully, they are more likely to trust researchers and cooperate willingly. 2. Credibility and Reputation: Users and the general public are more likely to trust products and services that have been developed using ethical UX research methods. 3. Valid and Reliable Data: Ethical considerations lead to more valid and reliable data. Researchers can be confident that their findings accurately represent user needs and experiences. 4. Legal Compliance: ensures compliance with data protection laws and regulations, reducing the risk of legal issues or penalties related to data privacy. 5. Avoidance of Bias: ensures that findings are not skewed in favor of any particular outcome. This leads to more objective and balanced insights. 6. Inclusive Design: Ethical considerations promote the inclusion of diverse participants, leading to more inclusive design practices. Products and services are more likely to meet the needs of a broader range of users. 7. Professional Development: Practicing ethical UX research can lead to professional growth and development for researchers, as they hone their skills in conducting research that is both effective and responsible. Benefits:
  3. • Be honest about how participant data will be collected,

    stored and used. • Also, honestly inform participants about whether their responses will be anonymous or confidential. • Be honest about the research methodology used. This includes disclosing any limitations of the study, potential biases, and any conflicts of interest that could affect the research process. • By the end of the research, present the results honestly, even if the outcomes do not align with expectations or preconceived notions. • Finally, when the research is completed, researchers provide honest and meaningful feedback to participants. By maintaining honesty and ethical principles in user research, you can build trust with participants, stakeholders, and the broader community. This trust is essential for the long-term success of user-centered design and the development of products and services that truly meet user needs and expectations. Honesty:
  4. • Clearly communicate the purpose, process, and potential impact of

    the research to participants. Ensure they fully understand what's expected of them. • Respect participants' autonomy and right to withdraw at any time without consequence. Show empathy by addressing their concerns and questions. • Consider the comfort and convenience of participants when scheduling interviews or usability tests, taking into account their availability and preferences. • Phrase questions and prompts in a non-leading and non-biased manner, avoiding language that might trigger discomfort or offense. • Be attuned to the emotional state of participants. If they appear distressed or uncomfortable, use empathy to adjust your approach, offer breaks, or allow them to skip questions. • Pay close attention to what participants are saying and any non-verbal cues they may give, such as body language and tone of voice. • Consider the impact of your findings on participants and any recommendations for mitigating harm or addressing issues that arose during the research. Sensitivity & Empathy:
  5. Accurate representation of findings is a critical ethical consideration in

    user research, as it ensures that the information gathered is honestly conveyed, and it helps maintain the trust of both the research participants and the broader community. 1. Transparency: Providing a clear and detailed description of the research process enables others to assess the validity and reliability of the findings. 2. Honest Reporting: Report findings truthfully and honestly, without distortion. This means presenting both positive and negative findings, as well as unexpected results. 3. Avoiding Bias: Researchers must be vigilant in avoiding bias. 4. Protection of Participants: Personal information should be handled carefully and confidential. 5. Informed Consent: Informed consent ensures that participants are aware of the study's objectives and willingly participate. 6. Appropriate Data Analysis: Use appropriate techniques and avoid misrepresenting data to support desired conclusions. 7. Peer Review: This can help ensure that the research withstands scrutiny from the scientific community, further enhancing the accuracy and reliability of the findings. Accurate Representation of Findings:
  6. 1. Informed Consent: Clearly explain the purpose of data collection,

    how the data will be used, and any potential risks involved. 2. Anonymity and Confidentiality: Ensure that any data collected is stored securely and accessible only to authorized personnel. 3. Data Minimization: Collect only the data that is necessary for your research objectives. Avoid collecting extraneous information that is not directly related to the research. 4. Data Security: Implement strong data security measures to prevent unauthorized access or breaches. Use encryption, access controls, and other security protocols to safeguard the data. 5. Data Retention: Specify how long the data will be stored, and ensure that it is deleted or anonymized after the specified period. 6. Consent for Data Sharing: If sharing data with third parties or making data publicly available, obtain additional consent from participants to ensure they are comfortable with the extended use of their data. 7. Vulnerable Populations: Take extra precautions when dealing with data from vulnerable populations, such as children or individuals with special needs. Ensure informed consent is obtained from guardians when applicable. 8. Data Quality: Ensure data accuracy and quality to avoid drawing incorrect conclusions that could harm individuals or misrepresent their experiences. 9. Ethics Review: When conducting research in academic or organizational settings, seek ethical approval from the appropriate ethics committees. 10. Compliance with Data Protection Laws: Ensure compliance with relevant data protection and privacy laws, such as GDPR or HIPAA, depending on the nature of your research. When Dealing with Large Data:
  7. UX research bias refers to the introduction of systematic and

    unintentional errors or prejudices in the process of conducting user experience (UX) research. These biases can skew the results and lead to inaccurate or incomplete understandings of how users interact with a product or service. Definition:
  8. • Confirmation bias • False Consensus bias • Recency bias

    • Primacy bias • Question Order bias • Implicit bias • Sunk Cost Fallacy • Etc. Types:
  9. Confirmation bias is a cognitive bias that can occur when

    researchers or designers unconsciously favor information that confirms their preconceived notions, beliefs, or hypotheses, while disregarding or downplaying data that contradicts those preconceptions. Confirmation bias can lead to inaccurate findings, poor design decisions, and ultimately, a less effective user experience. Here's how confirmation bias can manifest in UX research: 1. When creating surveys or questionnaires for user research, confirmation bias can influence the wording and structure of questions, leading to questions that steer participants toward desired responses. 2. Researchers may choose participants who are more likely to provide the feedback they want to hear, rather than a diverse and representative sample. To mitigate Confirmation bias in UX research: 1. Recognize the existence of confirmation bias and its potential impact on research 2. Ensure that user research includes a diverse group of participants to obtain a broader range of perspectives. 3.Use neutral and open-ended questions in surveys and interviews to avoid leading participants toward desired responses 4.Analyze data objectively, considering both positive and negative feedback equally. Confirmation bias:
  10. False consensus bias occurs when individuals overestimate the extent to

    which their own beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors are shared by others. Researchers and designers may assume that what they personally prefer or find intuitive will be the same for the majority of users. This bias can lead to design decisions that are based on the false belief that users' preferences align closely with their own. Also, in collaborative design and research settings, team members may assume that their collective viewpoint is representative of the user base as a whole, leading to groupthink and design choices based on a false consensus. To mitigate False Consensus bias in UX research: 1. Prioritize a user-centered approach in which user feedback and preferences are at the core of design decisions. Base design choices on evidence from a diverse set of users. 2. Ensure that your user research includes a wide range of participants, representing various demographics, needs, and preferences. 3. Base design decisions on data and evidence rather than personal assumptions or the assumptions of a limited group. 4. Seek input from colleagues and stakeholders who may have different viewpoints and experiences. They can provide a valuable external perspective. False Consensus:
  11. Recency bias is a cognitive bias that can influence UX

    research, affecting the way researchers perceive and interpret user feedback and the design decisions they make. This bias occurs when individuals give more weight to recent events or information while overlooking older but still relevant feedback or assume it is less important. Researchers might assume that recent design trends or popular features in the industry are the most important to users, neglecting the fact that user preferences can vary over time. To mitigate Recency bias in UX research: 1. Don't disregard older information if it remains relevant. 2. Pay attention to consistent usability problems or user preferences across multiple testing sessions, not just the most recent ones. 3. Aggregate data and feedback over time to identify patterns and changes in user behavior or preferences. Recency bias:
  12. Primacy bias refers to the human tendency to give disproportionate

    weight to the first information received or the initial experiences when making judgments or decisions. For instance, users or researchers may form strong initial impressions of a website, app, or product, and these first impressions can significantly influence their overall perception, even if subsequent interactions are more positive or negative. Also, researchers and designers might become attached to the initial design or concept, and this attachment can lead to a reluctance to make significant changes or consider alternative approaches. To mitigate Primacy bias in UX research: 1. Encourage an iterative design process that allows for changes and improvements based on ongoing research and user feedback, rather than sticking rigidly to the initial design concept. 2. Conduct usability testing with different participants at various stages of the project. 3. Encourage researchers and designers to remain open to evolving insights and prioritize user needs and preferences over initial assumptions or impressions. Primacy bias:
  13. Question order bias occurs when the order in which questions

    are presented influences how respondents answer them. Here's how question order bias can manifest in UX research and how to mitigate it: The way questions are ordered can sometimes lead to question interaction, where responses to one question affect responses to later questions. For example, a positively framed question may influence how a subsequent negatively framed question is answered. To mitigate false Question Order bias in UX research: 1. Divide questions into logical sections and randomize the order within each section. 2. Use reverse scales. For instance, if you ask one question in a positive way, ask a similar one in a negative way to balance the potential bias. 3. Avoid placing sensitive or personal questions at the beginning of a survey, as respondents may feel uncomfortable if they are asked such questions before they've had time to establish trust and rapport. Question Order bias:
  14. Implicit bias refers to unconscious, automatic attitudes or stereotypes that

    can affect our understanding and interactions with others. In UX research, researchers might unintentionally favor certain user groups or demographics when selecting participants for studies, they might unconsciously downplay the concerns of users from underrepresented groups. To mitigate Implicit bias in UX research: 1. Provide training and awareness programs for researchers to help them recognize and address their own implicit biases. 2. Implement techniques like blind user testing, where researchers are unaware of participants' demographics during testing to minimize bias in their interactions and evaluations. 3. Implement a peer review process to assess research findings, methods, and interpretations, which can help identify and rectify any implicit biases. Implicit bias:
  15. The Sunk Cost Fallacy occurs when individuals or organizations continue

    to invest time, money, and resources into a project or research effort, even when it becomes clear that the costs outweigh the potential benefits. Researchers may feel compelled to continue a research project or study, even when early findings indicate that it may not yield valuable insights or when the original research objectives are no longer relevant. They may be reluctant to abandon a concept, despite user feedback indicating that it is ineffective or unappealing, because they have already invested significant effort into it. To mitigate Sunk Cost Fallacy bias in UX research: 1. Continuously assess the relevance and value of a research project throughout its lifecycle. Be willing tom discontinue research that no longer aligns with the research objectives. 2. Base research decisions on the current and anticipated value of the insights gained, rather than solely on the resources or effort already invested. 3. Conduct pilot studies and create prototypes or minimal viable products (MVPs) early in the research process to test assumptions and evaluate the potential for success before significant resources are committed. 4. Regularly perform cost-benefit analyses to assess whether the benefits of continuing a research project outweigh the costs. If not, consider redirection or discontinuation. Sunk Cost Fallacy bias:
  16. This involves the systematic process of selecting a representative group

    of participants to gather insights and data about their experiences with a product or service. 1.Define Your Target Population: Start by clearly defining the population of users you want to study. 2.Determine Your Research Objectives: Consider what specific insights or data you want to collect. Your research objectives will guide the sampling methodology. 3.Choose the Sampling Method: 1. Probability Sampling: In probability sampling, every user in the defined population has a known chance of being selected. 2. Non-Probability Sampling: In non-probability sampling, not every user has a known chance of being selected, e.g., convenience sampling. 4.Sample Size Determination: Calculate an appropriate sample size based on statistical principles to ensure that your results are reliable and representative. 5.Recruitment Process: Reach out to the selected participants through various methods, such as email, phone calls, or in-person interactions. Clearly communicate the purpose of the research, the expected time commitment, and any incentives for participation. 6.Informed Consent: Ensure that participants provide informed consent to participate in the research. 7.Data Collection and Analysis: Conduct the research, gather data, and analyze the findings. 8.Reporting and Generalization: When reporting the results, be transparent about the sampling methodology. 9.Ongoing Iteration: Be open to refining your approach based on the evolving needs of your research.
  17. Research planning is a crucial phase in any research project

    which helps ensure that the research is well-structured, efficient, and produces meaningful results. Here are some best practices for research planning: • Define Clear Objectives • Understand the Context • Identify Target Audience • Select Research Methods • Budget and Resources • Participant Recruitment • Ethical Considerations • Data Collection Tools • Pilot Testing • Data Analysis Plan • Documentation • Data Storage and Management • Reporting and Dissemination • Iterative Approach • Quality Assurance • Peer Review • Timely Communication
  18. Task: 1. Carry out a competitive analysis for your research

    project and document your findings. 2. Expand your knowledge about how researchers can minimize their own biases during data collection and analysis.