Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
How We Built a Secure Sandbox Platform for AI A...
Search
GMO Flatt Security
November 17, 2025
Technology
630
2
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
How We Built a Secure Sandbox Platform for AI Agents
GMO Flatt Security
November 17, 2025
More Decks by GMO Flatt Security
See All by GMO Flatt Security
Claude Mythos、Fable...フロンティアAIの最新動向と企業のセキュリティ対策
flatt_security
0
200
インシデント事例と パッケージの全量解析に学ぶ ソフトウェアサプライチェーンの守り方 / supply-chain-attack-defense
flatt_security
0
2.8k
コードを読まない時代の死角: 検出から検証へ、脆弱性診断AIエージェントの現在地 / state-of-vulnerability-ai-agents
flatt_security
4
1.1k
セキュアなコンテナイメージをつくろう 〜CVE-free コンテナイメージ「Takumi Images」の概要と裏話〜
flatt_security
3
230
AI Agent SaaS を支える自社仮想化基盤への挑戦と実運用 / ai-agent-saas-virtualization
flatt_security
3
5.1k
Mastra ソフトウェアサプライチェーン攻撃の概要と対応指針
flatt_security
1
71
ソフトウェアサプライチェーン攻撃対策として今からサクッとできること
flatt_security
2
280
更なる npm パッケージ侵害事件「Mini Shai-Hulud」徹底解説
flatt_security
1
600
Bitwarden ソフトウェアサプライチェーン攻撃 詳細解説
flatt_security
4
1.7k
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
AIがコードを書く時代、人間は何を保証するのか———馬場さんと考える、開発者に求められる新しい責任と価値 - TECH PLAY
netmarkjp
0
1.3k
MIRU 2026 チュートリアル
keisuke198619
0
840
PLaMo 3.0 Primeの構造化出力サポート
pfn
PRO
0
190
『三匹の子ぶた』から学ぶネットワークセキュリティの昔と今 / Network Security: Then and Now Through the Lens of The Three Little Pigs
nttcom
1
1.7k
新しい SLO が良い感じにハマっている話
z63d
5
2.1k
サイバー捜査員研修(後半)
nomizone
1
760
SnowflakeCoCoでデータエンジニアリング!
foursue
0
180
修正PRを食べてレビュースキルが賢くなる:Claude Codeによる自己改善サイクル
yuyaumetsu
5
1.3k
Data Hubグループ 紹介資料
sansan33
PRO
0
3.1k
TypeScript入門 2026
recruitengineers
PRO
2
400
Webアクセシビリティ入門 2026
recruitengineers
PRO
2
350
Breaking the Seal: Static Deobfuscation of Compiled V8 JavaScript Bytecode Malware
hshrzd
0
570
Featured
See All Featured
The untapped power of vector embeddings
frankvandijk
2
1.8k
Improving Core Web Vitals using Speculation Rules API
sergeychernyshev
21
1.6k
Measuring & Analyzing Core Web Vitals
bluesmoon
9
950
How to Ace a Technical Interview
jacobian
281
24k
Design of three-dimensional binary manipulators for pick-and-place task avoiding obstacles (IECON2024)
konakalab
0
520
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
marcelosomers
234
17k
Information Architects: The Missing Link in Design Systems
soysaucechin
0
1k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
55
8.3k
Breaking role norms: Why Content Design is so much more than writing copy - Taylor Woolridge
uxyall
0
360
Responsive Adventures: Dirty Tricks From The Dark Corners of Front-End
smashingmag
254
22k
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
10k
How to audit for AI Accessibility on your Front & Back End
davetheseo
0
480
Transcript
How We Built a Secure Sandbox Platform for AI Agents
AIエージェントSaaSを安全に 提供するための自社サンドボックス基盤 CODE BLUE 2025 Software Engineer @pizzacat83
© 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. $
whoami @pizzacat83 SWE @ GMO Flatt Security Inc. Developing “Takumi byGMO” Formerly security engineer セキュリティ若手の会 幹事 (第1期) seccamp ‘20 alumnus
🤖 Make a cool blog app The of AI Agents
has made various operations ––As far as it requires no human intervention. But autonomy comes with ... AI Agents interacts with the env, maybe in an unintended way Press a dangerous button Upload confidential info to public Delete or modify important data “Require human approval” ruins autonomy! autonomy scalable risks Autonomous interaction © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Restrict the access to the env so that the worst
possible damage is still acceptable 🤖 What internal info can be read? What external communication is possible? Confidential docs Public web pages Confidential docs Full internet access Full internet access No internet access = Acceptable! = Not acceptable × × × = Acceptable! © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. To Achieve Autonomy without Sacrificing Security What action can be made against internal resources?
Local AI Agents Cloud-hosted, multi-tenant AI Agents AI may have
access to whatever human has AI may interfere with AI of another tenant AI may have access to internal services filesystem filesystem internal systems A internal services © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. AI Agents with Compute environment Run code, read files, browse the web, ... So we sandbox them! 🤖 🤖 B 🤖
Tenant A Tenant A Data A Data A Data B
Data B Tenant B Tenant B 🤖 🤖 e.g., If A must not access data of B, MUST NOT write data of B to where A can read MUST NOT allow A to read where B can write data → A’s agent and B’s agent must be isolated Permission boundary gives a hint. © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Isolate per what?
User X User X Data A Data A Data B
Data B User Y User Y 🤖 🤖 © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Isolate per what? e.g., If A must not access data of B, MUST NOT write data of B to where A can read MUST NOT allow A to read where B can write data → A’s agent and B’s agent must be isolated Permission boundary gives a hint.
git checkout branch-a git checkout branch-b Same user “Please review
PR #123” “Please review PR #987” Without properly isolating the workspaces, even benign AI Agents can interfere each other. © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Ideally, isolate per agent––not just for security! 🤖 💥 🤖
per-agent isolation (In some usecases) VM-level isolation multi-tenant resource sharing
scalability Technically challenging! Start working in seconds (for chat UX) © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Requirements for sandbox, for AI Agent as a Service
Takumi – AI-Powered AppSec Auditor CVE-2025-29768 potential data loss with
zip.vim and special crafted zip files in Vim < v9.1.1198 vim/vim CVE-2025-30218 x-middleware-subrequest-id may be leaked to external hosts vercel/next.js CVE-2025-31483 Stored XSS in Miniflux Media Proxy due to improper Content-Security- Policy configuration miniflux/v2 We faced this technical challenge of sandboxing during the development of our AI Agent product “Takumi byGMO”. © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Whitebox Blackbox Review Exploit User input unescaped! Let’s send <script>...
© 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. What Takumi can do
Whitebox Blackbox Review Exploit User input unescaped! Let’s send <script>...
exploit.py Needs a sandbox! © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. How Takumi works
“Review PR #123” Spawn a sandbox Here you go! ©
2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. So we developed a sandbox platform! Sandbox platform Backend server
More isolated More overhead Docker can run inside sandbox Less
isolated Less overhead Can seamlessly fallback to non-sandboxed exec ‘s choice! © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Isolation technologies Anthropic Sandbox Runtime: bubblewrap, Seatbelt Codex: Landlock, seccomp, Seatbelt Gemini CLI: Seatbelt Virtual machines Containers Others Claude Code provides official Dev Container
Node (VM pool) apiserver VMM: Firecracker Many VMs in 1
Node Forward request Give me a VM! Horizontally scalable …… © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Architecture of our sandbox platform
OSS virtualization technology maintained by AWS Core technology of AWS
Lambda Implemented in Rust Has just minimal features for Lambda-like workload Performance benefit: Low overhead! Boots in <1 sec Thousands of Firecracker VMs can run in one machine Security benefit: Small attack surface! © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Firecracker – Security of VMs, Speed like containers
“ in box” style Agent “ in box” style Action
🧠 🧠 Container Use Devin Takumi Claude Code in Dev Container © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Architectures for sandboxing AI Agents LLM API LLM API How does this work?
User message Tool use request Execute tool Tool use result
Agent implementation © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Internals of AI Agents LLM API “Summarize errors in ./logs” Tool name: Bash Args: ls ./logs Tool name: Bash Args: head logs/01.log bash -c ${args} Tool output: 01.log 02.log ... LLM itself doesn’t run commands! Actual execution happens here 1 2 3 4 5 6 reply prompt stdout reply args resp2 prompt reply stdout := := := ... callLLMAPI exec callLLMAPI ([ ]); ( , , [ ]. ); ([ , , ])); "bash" "-c" "Bash" substitutable!
User message Tool use request Execute tool Tool use result
Agent implementation © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Example: Ask for human before exec LLM API “Summarize errors in ./logs” Tool name: Bash Args: head logs/01.log Ask for human’s approval and then: bash -c ${args} Tool output: 01.log 02.log ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 reply prompt reply args throw stdout reply args resp2 prompt reply stdout := ! := := ... callLLMAPI confirmHuman exec callLLMAPI ([ ]); ( [ ]. ) { } ( , , [ ]. ); ([ , , ])); if "Bash" "rejected by human" "bash" "-c" "Bash" Ask for human approval
User message Tool use request Execute tool Tool use result
Agent implementation © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Example: “Action in box” style (container) LLM API “Summarize errors in ./logs” Tool name: Bash Args: head logs/01.log docker run ubuntu bash -c ${args} Tool output: 01.log 02.log ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 reply prompt stdout reply args resp2 prompt reply stdout := := := ... callLLMAPI exec callLLMAPI ([ ]); ( , , , , , [ ]. ); ([ , , ])); "docker" "run" "ubuntu" "bash" "-c" "Bash" Exec in container!
User message Tool use request Execute tool Tool use result
Agent implementation The risk is NOT the LLM output itself What to isolate is the real action taken based on it © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Example: “Action in box” style (VM) LLM API “Summarize errors in ./logs” Tool name: Bash Args: head logs/01.log ssh user@$VM_IP bash -c ${args} Tool output: 01.log 02.log ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 reply prompt stdout reply args resp2 prompt reply stdout := := := ... callLLMAPI exec callLLMAPI ([ ]); ( , , , , [ ]. ); ([ , , ])); "ssh" `user@${vmIP}` "bash" "-c" "Bash" Exec in VM!
“ in box” style Agent “ in box” style Action
🧠 🧠 Container Use Devin Takumi Claude Code in Dev Container © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Architectures for sandboxing AI Agents LLM API LLM API Why choose this style?
“Agent in box” style “Action in box” style 🧠 🧠
LLM API Key can be leaked Key is protected © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Architectures for sandboxing AI Agents 1 2 3 4 5 reply prompt stdout reply args resp2 prompt reply := := := callLLMAPI exec callLLMAPI ([ ]); ( , , , , [ ]. ); ([ , , "ssh" `user@${vmIP}` "bash" "-c" "Bash" LLM API key LLM API key LLM API LLM API
“Agent in box” style “Action in box” style 🧠 🧠
© 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Architectures for sandboxing AI Agents LLM API key LLM API key LLM API LLM API “Agent in box” style minimizes what the untrusted sandbox has access to
“ in box” style Agent “ in box” style Action
🧠 🧠 Good choice when implementing Agent as a Service (esp. multi-tenant) Good choice when running closed-source AI Agent (i.e. when you can’t isolate the internals) © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Architectures for sandboxing AI Agents LLM API LLM API Make sure all untrusted actions happen in isolated env
VM Affinity Ensure the Brain VM and the Compute VM
of the same agent are spawned in the same Node VM snapshots Make snapshots with the dev env set up e.g., apt install, clone repositories Boot VMs with zero-copied snapshots (Copy-on-Write) …… © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Topics we won't cover today: Techniques for speed & efficiency
Isolation is critical for AI Agents, for security, and more
We showed various approaches to isolation, and when to choose which Provisioning sandboxes for multi-tenant, cloud-hosted AI Agents is technically challenging, and we built a secure and performant sandbox platform © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. Conclusion
We are the backbone of engineers. GMO Flatt Security, based
in Tokyo, offers expert security assessments and penetration testing for software. Our seasoned professionals deliver proven, top-tier services. We also provide tools to help you internalize cutting edge, state of the art security practices.
脆弱性診断・ペネトレーションテストを プロフェッショナルサービス / AIで多角的に提供 専門家・高度診断 コード・仕様の分析も行い、 専門家が脆弱性を網羅的に発見 AI・継続診断 継続的なセキュリティレビューを AIエージェントで簡単に実現
提供サービス 提供サービス
Tomorrow, Nov. 19th 10:00 / 11:30 / 13:00 / 14:30
Track 2 (HALL A) Visit Our Booth! Join Our Workshop! Thank you! AI x Pentesting Forefront: A Hands-on Workshop with "Takumi byGMO" Meet our team! Learn more about our company and our services. We’re hiring! recruit.flatt.tech © 2025 GMO Flatt Security Inc. All Rights Reserved. What’s next? Learn more & Get hands-on