semantic web media summit

2fe04dfc07fb096ad0c01a6e31831b1c?s=47 mike dunn
September 14, 2011

semantic web media summit

keynote from event in nyc

2fe04dfc07fb096ad0c01a6e31831b1c?s=128

mike dunn

September 14, 2011
Tweet

Transcript

  1. Michael S. Dunn Semantic Web Media Summit #semanticmedia | @glemak

    New York – 09/14/11
  2. •  Problem: State of Media & Content – The Media Industry

    has been in catch-up mode since the web started – How can we get ahead of the curve and maximize the utilization and value of our content? •  Solution: Structuring of Content – Improve Production | Distribution – Enhance Consumption | Monetization Semantic Web & Media
  3. • The Constant Transitional State of Media – Traditional/Original: Shifted to the

    Web – Now: Social | Mobile | Local | Aggregation – Tomorrow: Expect More Demand – Focus: From Reactive to Proactive – Timing: Now or Sooner Semantic Web & Media
  4. •  Why Foster a Sense of Urgency – Velocity of Content

    Requests are Increasing •  Proliferation of Devices | Inbound Access •  Don’t Ignore IPv6 – Markets are Continuously Changing – Audience Requirements are Shifting •  Real-Time | Niche | Thematic | Contextual Semantic Web & Media
  5. •  Hearst as an Example – Private | Diverse | Decentralized

    – Creating Content for Multiple Industries – TV | Magazines | Newspapers – Cable | B2B | Marketing | Web Only – Short Text | Long Form – Videos | Photos | Slideshows | Audio Semantic Web & Media
  6. •  Technology Assumptions – Existing Content Management Systems •  Content exists

    in Silos •  Mostly Single Use Content •  Both Centralized & Diverse •  Simple Processes Required – Limited Journalists | Editors | Creators •  Inability to Grow Staff to meet Demand Semantic Web & Media
  7. •  Technology Assumptions – Workflow changes are Complex – A Technology Stack

    Perspective •  Shift Focus from Commodity to Innovation •  Resources focused on Revenue Opportunities Semantic Web & Media
  8. •  Return on Investment for Content – What Markets exist for

    our Content? – Have we already “paid” for this content? •  By creating it ourselves •  By licensing it from others •  Via a related or partner entity – Analytics | Metrics Must Exist •  For Granular Content Elements •  Not just Pages Published Semantic Web & Media
  9. SEARCH CONTENT ADVERTISING CONTEXT > SEO > CPM SENTIMENT Semantic

    Web & Media
  10. •  No Longer Just About Context of Content – Context of

    Audience is a Priority – Getting the Right Content – To the Right “Identity” – Via the Right Mechanism – At the Right Time – All Via Bucketed Personalization Semantic Web & Media
  11. •  Goal: Ability to Treat Content like Data – Organize it

    Better – Describe it Better – Discover it Better – Analyze it Better – Expose it Better – Repurpose it Better Semantic Web & Media
  12. •  Content as Data – Automated Metadata – Semi-Automated via Selection Process

    – Systemic via Devices | Tools – Content Optimization •  Cleansing | Normalizing •  Allow Self Describing •  Make it Harvestable Semantic Web & Media
  13. •  Content on the Web Assumptions – Google doesn’t trust Metadata

    – Aggregators Ignore Layout Preferences – SEO is a Constantly Changing Game – Audience | Traffic Drivers •  40% Brand | Marketing •  30% Search •  30% Social Semantic Web & Media
  14. Semantic Web & Media •  What is the Semantic Web?

    – Descriptive Markup Techniques for Content – Links Associated with Content – Links Between Content Entities – Rich Metadata about Content – Meant to Foster Machine Readability
  15. •  Semantics of Semantic Web – Do Not Get Overwhelmed by

    the Lexicon – Linked Data | Web 3.0 – Ontology | Vocabulary | Taxonomy – Triples | Turtle | OWL | Sparql – rdf | rdfa | microdata | microformats Semantic Web & Media
  16. Semantic Web & Media •  Why Media Industry should be

    interested in the Semantic Web – Create Efficiencies During Content Creation – Better Understand Content Already Available – Insure Discoverability of Content – Take Advantage of Opportunities
  17. •  Structured Content Landscape – Community Driven Standards – RDFa •  W3C

    •  IPTC - rnews •  Facebook – Opengraph – Microformats – Linked Open Data Semantic Web & Media
  18. Linked Open Data

  19. •  Structured Content Landscape – Microdata (html5) •  Schema.org •  Google

    Rich Snippets •  Focused Primarily on Search •  Vendor Driven - Community Critiqued Semantic Web & Media
  20. •  Structuring Content Creates – Deeper Entity Extraction – Generates Richer Metadata

    – Generates Better Tags & Links – Associates Related Content – Generates Reusable Structured Content – Improve Workflows •  Reporting | Research | Editorial | Production Semantic Web & Media
  21. •  Why is Structured Content More Relevant – Accessibility – Interoperability – Allows

    Value Assessment – Meaningful Relationships – Searchable – Discover Sentiment – Maximize Reusability Semantic Web & Media
  22. •  Value Your Content – Utilize Open Standards – Insure Data Portability

    – Aim for Broadest Solution – Avoid Vendor Lock-In – Own Your Structured Content •  Consider Drupal – 2 Way Semantic CMS Semantic Web & Media
  23. •  Goals to Consider: Productivity – Reduce Time to Market – Increase

    Insight – Improve Consistency – Create a “Toolkit” for “Owned” Content Semantic Web & Media
  24. •  Goals to Consider: Content – Increase Usage – Lower Cost to

    Produce – Improve Discoverability – Leverage 2 Way Structured Content Semantic Web & Media
  25. •  Goals to Consider: Audience – Improve User Experience – Increase Levels

    of User Engagement – Allow Better Personalization & Targeting – Enable a Content API Semantic Web & Media
  26. •  Goals to Consider: Revenue – Enhance Existing Streams – Enable Net

    New Opportunities – Integrate with Semantic Ecosystem •  Advertising •  Search •  Social •  Aggregation Semantic Web & Media
  27. Semantic Bus CMS DAM CRM Advertising Networks Web Services (SAAS)

    Browser Mobile+ Partners xml rss api RDFa Analysis Contextual Audience Search (SEO/SEM) html Social Networks (SMM) OWL microformats metadata entity extraction contextualization attributes relationships machine-readable syndication Ontologies Vocabularies Categories findability NLP Layout Bus node specific UX sentiment tagging Data Exchange <@glemak> Semantic Web & Media (Framework)
  28. Semantic System Architecture (Inform) Author  ‣  Content Creation Services

    ‣  Semantic Data Repository ‣  Semantic Data Analysis ‣  Content Selection Algorithms ‣  Webservices ‣  Content Distribution Services  Audience Content Selection Algorithms ‣  Semantic Analysis of Content ‣  Algorithms > Editorial Criteria ‣  Maximize Relevancy/Relatedness ‣  Maximize Click-Through ‣  Maximize Monetization
  29. •  Utilization by Media Companies – Web Content Management •  Automated

    Topic Pages •  Text Mining | Entity Extraction •  Deep Categorization •  Related Content | Media | Tagging – Social Media – Business Intelligence – Recommendations Semantic Web & Media
  30. •  Focus on Semantic Web – Academia | Researchers | Standards

    | Entrepreneurs – Need Enterprise Engagement •  How to Start… – Lead with Revenue Enhancement Opportunities – Show How to Solve Business Problems – Show How to Measure Results Semantic Web & Media
  31. http://about.me/glemak