code that grants anyone, anywhere the FREEDOM to study, use, modify, incorporate, sell and share It is software that thrives because of the existence of the Internet FOSS guarantees that ideas continue to be developed and enhanced and will be available in perpetuity
- Monopoly of an individual/company - No right to modify, limited rights to use - Industrial age legacy, per copy licensing - Works in an economy of scarcity Open Source - Share, Collaborate - Community owned, accessible to all - Changes and sharing encouraged - Freely distributable, pay for value-added services - Builds an economy of abundance
Source Freedom to modify the code (Fedora, Software Patents Issue) Open Standards Enabling access to data (ODF, Royalty Free Standards) Open Content Access to Knowledge (Creative Commons, Wikipedia)
Development Effort Estimate: 59,389 person years Total Estimated Cost to Develop: $10.7 billion Compared to 2002: 680% increase in size, a 750% increase in effort, and a 900% increase in traditional development costs OLPC Google Android Cloud Computing
don't pay for using physical standards (weights, measures etc). Why should we pay for digital standards? Data is forever, applications come and go (eg. Wordstar, Wordperfect, Microsoft Word, Open Office) – can your grandchildren read your docs in 2100? Open standards help clinically separate applications from data. HTML is one of the great example of an open standard; ODF is another.
“referee” As a Consumer: - Government needs choice like everyone; once choice is made, it tends to stay for an extended period As a Referee: - The free market for ICT has been in a subverted state for a long time – i.e., there isn't a level playing field for FOSS to take root - Government action in positive discrimination in favour of FOSS can correct this free market/economic distortion eg Malaysian OSCC
if unavoidable All applications built with government funds should be under an open source license E-gov applications should be hosted in a code- repository like Sourceforge eg Sahana Create communities around areas of shared interest Encourage and foster open source in education
one vendor for IT infrastructure Cultural: Freedom to modify software to suit cultural needs, eg. localizing FOSS to Bikol, Cebuano, Hiligaynon, Ilokano, Kapampangan, Kinaray-a, Maguindanao, Maranao, Pangasinan, Tagalog, Tausug and Waray Economic: Builds Filipino ICT capacity and capability with inherent technology transfer and corrects current free market distortion. Savings in “licenses” and translating that into investing in local skills