ω is a family of infinite subsets of ω closed upwards with respect to ⊆and closed under finite modifications. Examples: filters, sets positive with respect to a filter (also called co-ideals, superfilters or ramsey semifilters)
ω is a family of infinite subsets of ω closed upwards with respect to ⊆and closed under finite modifications. Examples: filters, sets positive with respect to a filter (also called co-ideals, superfilters or ramsey semifilters), sets containing arbitrarily long intervals (thick sets). ▶ A very general notion, not really interesting on its own, just a shortcut.
ω is a family of infinite subsets of ω closed upwards with respect to ⊆and closed under finite modifications. Examples: filters, sets positive with respect to a filter (also called co-ideals, superfilters or ramsey semifilters), sets containing arbitrarily long intervals (thick sets). ▶ A very general notion, not really interesting on its own, just a shortcut. ▶ There is a book on them ([?])
ω is a family of infinite subsets of ω closed upwards with respect to ⊆and closed under finite modifications. Examples: filters, sets positive with respect to a filter (also called co-ideals, superfilters or ramsey semifilters), sets containing arbitrarily long intervals (thick sets). ▶ A very general notion, not really interesting on its own, just a shortcut. ▶ There is a book on them ([?])
S as a partial order; ultrafilters = maximal filters ▶ d = c gives P-ultrafilters on every Gδ semifilter ▶ weak P-ultrafilters on every co-meager semifilter in ZFC
(βN, +) is a topological semigroup ▶ minimal left ideals, idempotents, ordering of idempotents ▶ Hindman, Strauss, 9.25&9.26: Are there minimal&maximal idempotents? ▶ I learned last week that Zelenyuk had, independently, answered the question
ultrafilter on a co-ideal is a (full) ultrafilter. We get (weak) P-points consisting of interesting sets ▶ van der Waerden sets ▶ non summable sets ▶ sets of edges containing arbitrarily large complete subgraphs Some of these ultrafilters cannot be selective