Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchain 2.0
Search
Kenji Saito
PRO
July 12, 2017
Technology
440
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchain 2.0
ブロックチェーンハブ主催で開催しているブロックチェーン基盤技術講義『ブロックチェーン 2.0』のスライドです。2017年7月12日(水) に使用しました。
Kenji Saito
PRO
July 12, 2017
More Decks by Kenji Saito
See All by Kenji Saito
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 4 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 4
ks91
PRO
0
6
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 3 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 3
ks91
PRO
0
37
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 2 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 2
ks91
PRO
0
83
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 1 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 1
ks91
PRO
0
33
責任2.0/3.0 ∼ 知的創造過程の脱領土化 / Responsibility 2.0 and 3.0: The Deterritorialization of the Intellectual Creative Process
ks91
PRO
0
37
国と地域のマネジメントと AGI / National and Regional Management and AGI
ks91
PRO
0
26
2026 年度「AI による研究・教育サポート」ワークショップ (教員向け) / AY 2026 “AI-Based Research and Education Support” Workshop (For Faculty)
ks91
PRO
0
54
エージェント化するAI:現在地とその先に起きる変化 / AI as Agents: The Current State and the Changes Ahead
ks91
PRO
0
220
文化的ループ (推論, エージェント) と思考プロセスの検証可能性 / Cultural Loops (Inference, Agents) and the Verifiability of Thought Processes
ks91
PRO
0
50
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
リアーキテクチャ後の障害ゼロを目指したShadow Testingの取り組み
nihonbuson
PRO
1
160
AgentCore Runtime上にAgentic Coding基盤を構築・展開する際の設計ポイントと限界点 / Design considerations and limitations when building an agentic coding platform on AgentCore Runtime
har1101
5
360
今話題のAI「Jev」って何? 宇宙最速で学ぶ会
minorun365
PRO
30
16k
AIは推し活である。
kurazuuuuuu
1
830
顧客に向き合う開発組織へ。リアーキテクチャとフィーチャーチーム化で挑む組織改革
safie
0
2.1k
俺の仕事は AIに奪われないし、たぶんその BIも要らない
hikaruri
0
520
幾何アルゴリズムで なめらかなピン操作を / iOSDC Japan 2026 / smoothpin
kazumanagano
0
360
AIを活用するために決めた "やらないこと" - 価値に注目する / Not betting on AI
soudai
PRO
3
560
SREの視点で考えるSIEM活用術 〜AWS環境でのセキュリティ強化〜
cscengineer
PRO
0
120
LTのテーマ どうきめてる?〜5つの型と私のやり方〜
yama3133
1
110
アクセスキーこわい やめかたと漏らさない工夫
sassssan68
1
460
事業課題から技術的負債に向き合う
sansantech
PRO
2
2k
Featured
See All Featured
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
699
190k
Visual Storytelling: How to be a Superhuman Communicator
reverentgeek
2
660
16th Malabo Montpellier Forum Presentation
akademiya2063
PRO
0
380
Building Adaptive Systems
keathley
44
3.2k
Taking LLMs out of the black box: A practical guide to human-in-the-loop distillation
inesmontani
PRO
3
2.4k
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
432
67k
The Impact of AI in SEO - AI Overviews June 2024 Edition
aleyda
6
1.2k
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
addyosmani
515
110k
Visualization
eitanlees
152
17k
Designing Powerful Visuals for Engaging Learning
tmiket
1
570
The Web Performance Landscape in 2024 [PerfNow 2024]
tammyeverts
12
1.3k
Efficient Content Optimization with Google Search Console & Apps Script
katarinadahlin
PRO
1
870
Transcript
2.0 SFC / CSO
[email protected]
2.0 — — 2017-07-12 –
p.1/39
( ) SFC ( ) CSO (Chief Science Officer) CEO
1993 M.Eng ( ) 2006 ( ) SFC 16 P2P 2011 → ( ) 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.2/39
/ Segregated Witness Proof of Stake 2.0 — — 2017-07-12
– p.3/39
2.0 1. 2. Segregated Witness 3. 4. Proof of Stake
( ) 5. 6. 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.4/39
1. 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.5/39
BTC / . . . 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 –
p.6/39
EPOBC (Open Assets) OP_RETURN 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.7/39
Open Assets Protocol (OAP) ( = ) 2.0 — —
2017-07-12 – p.8/39
ID ID (asset ID) 1. 2. 3. 160 = ID
( ) 4. base58check ‘A’ ( = 23) (asset quantity) BTC 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.9/39
OP_RETURN PUSH 0x4f41 (‘OA’) = 2 0x0100 2 1∼9 LEB128
1∼9 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.10/39
2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.11/39
2. Segregated Witness ( = ) (malleability) 2.0 — —
2017-07-12 – p.12/39
(witness) 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.13/39
OP_RETURN PUSH 0xaa21a9ed 4 (witness) SHA-256 32 Merkle 2.0 —
— 2017-07-12 – p.14/39
(1) P2WPKH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-public-key-hash) witness ( ): < >
< > scriptSig ( ): scriptPubKey ( ) 0 <20-byte > 20-byte < > < > CHECKSIG 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.15/39
(2) P2WSH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-script-hash) witness: < 1 > <1
< 1 > < 2 > 2 CHECKMULTISIG> scriptSig: scriptPubKey 0 <32-byte > 32-byte 1-out-of-2 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.16/39
SegWit 2016 100 SegWit (95% ) . . . 2.0
— — 2017-07-12 – p.17/39
. . . Litecoin Monacoin SegWit . . . 2.0
— — 2017-07-12 – p.18/39
3. 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.19/39
BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) ex. BIP 1 : BIP Purposes
and Guidelines https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0001.mediawiki ex. BIP 9 : Version bits with timeout and delay ex. BIP 141 : Segregated Witness (Consensus layer) TCP/IP RFC XMPP XEP 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.20/39
Block Header Data Structure Field Description Size (bytes) Version 4
Digest Double SHA-256 value 32 Merkle root Double SHA-256 value 32 Time Seconds (since 1970-01-01T00:00 UTC) 4 Target Compressed format 4 Nonce Appropriate value 4 Merkle root is the digest of all TXs 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.21/39
BIP 9 SegWit https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0009/assignments.mediawiki MTP : Median Time Past (
11 ) 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.22/39
4. Proof of Stake ( ) 2.0 — — 2017-07-12
– p.23/39
Proof of Stake ( ) ( ) 2.0 — —
2017-07-12 – p.24/39
Proof of Stake Hn (PD + id + t +
. . .) ≤ 2n × balance d H n : n (ex. SHA-256 (n = 256)) PD : id : (ex. ) t : (ex. UNIX ( )) balance : d : (ex. ) PoW 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.25/39
Proof of Stake 3 1. 2. “Nothing at Stake” 3.
51% 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.26/39
: Proof of Stake Velocity Reddcoin 2.0 — — 2017-07-12
– p.27/39
Nothing at Stake - = 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 –
p.28/39
Nothing at Stake - 100% Proof of Stake 2.0 —
— 2017-07-12 – p.29/39
51% 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.30/39
5. . . . 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.31/39
2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.32/39
2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.33/39
→ ⇒ A. Back, et. al., “Enabling Blockchain Innovations with
Pegged Sidechains”, 2014 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.34/39
6. 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.35/39
1 1 10 2 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.36/39
A-B 2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.37/39
2 2 ( ) Ripple Path 2.0 — — 2017-07-12
– p.38/39
2.0 — — 2017-07-12 – p.39/39