How to run a lab for reproducible research

C10c1cc1bd01eb53c616f2d0a1786fe5?s=47 Lorena A. Barba
February 21, 2017

How to run a lab for reproducible research

Invited talk at the NSF SI2 PI Workshop, Arlington, VA (21 Feb. 2017).

Please cite as:
Barba, Lorena A. (2017): How to run a lab for reproducible research. figshare.
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4676170.v1

Summary:
As a principal investigator, how do you run your lab for reproducibility? I submit the following action areas: commitment, transparency and open science, onboarding, collaboration, community and leadership. Make a public commitment to reproducible research—what this means for you could differ from others, but an essential core is common to all. Transparency is an essential value, and embracing open science is the best route to realize it. Onboarding every lab member with a deliberate group “syllabus” for reproducibility sets the expectations high. What is your list of must-read literature on reproducible research? I can share mine with you: my lab members helped to make it. For collaborating efficiently and building community, we take inspiration from the open-source world. We adopt its technology platforms to work on software and to communicate, openly and collaboratively. Key to the open-source culture is to give credit—give lots of credit for every contribution: code, documentation, tests, issue reports! The tools and methods require training, but running a lab for reproducibility is your decision. Start here–>commitment.

See also:
—Barba, Lorena A. (2016): "The hard road to reproducibility," Science, Vol. 354, Issue 6308, pp. 142 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6308/142
—Barba, Lorena A. (2016): "Barba-group reproducibility syllabus," on Medium / Hacker Noon, https://hackernoon.com/barba-group-reproducibility-syllabus-e3757ee635cf#.a9qtcndo6
—Barba, Lorena A. (2012): Reproducibility PI Manifesto. figshare.
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.104539.v1

C10c1cc1bd01eb53c616f2d0a1786fe5?s=128

Lorena A. Barba

February 21, 2017
Tweet

Transcript

  1. 1.

    NSF SI2 PI Workshop 2017 How to run a lab

    for reproducible research @LorenaABarba
  2. 2.

    “… if everyone on a research team knows that everything

    they do is going to someday be published for reproducibility, they’ll behave differently from day one.” Donoho et al., Comput. Science Eng. 2009
  3. 3.

    Action items 1. Commitment 2. Transparency & Open Science 3.

    Onboarding 4. Collaboration 5. Community & Leadership
  4. 5.

    Jon F. Claerbout Professor Emeritus of Geophysics Stanford University …

    pioneered the use of computers in processing and filtering seismic exploration data [Wikipedia] … from 1991, he required theses to conform to a standard of reproducibility.
  5. 6.

    Def.— Reproducible research Authors provide all the necessary data and

    the computer codes to run the analysis again, re- creating the results. Schwab, M., Karrenbach, N., Claerbout, J. (2000) “Making scientific computations reproducible,” Computing in Science and Engineering Vol. 2(6):61–67
  6. 8.

    ‣ I teach my graduate students about reproducibility ‣ All

    our research code (and writing) is under version control ‣ We always carry out verification & validation (and make them public) ‣ For main results, we share data, plotting script & figure under CC-BY ‣ We upload preprint to arXiv at the time of submission to a journal ‣ We release code at the time of submission of a paper to a journal ‣ We add a “Reproducibility” declaration at the end of each paper ‣ I develop a consistent open-science policy & keep an up-to-date web presence Reproducibility PI Manifesto (2012)
  7. 9.
  8. 10.

    “I’ve learned that interactive programs are slavery (unless they include

    the ability to arrive in any previous state by means of a script).” — Jon Claerbout GUIs
  9. 11.
  10. 13.

    “private reproducibility” …we can rebuild our own past research results

    from the precise version of the code that was used to create them.
  11. 14.

    What is Science? ‣ American Physical Society: - Ethics and

    Values, 1999 "The success and credibility of science are anchored in the willingness of scientists to […] Expose their ideas and results to independent testing and replication by others. This requires the open exchange of data, procedures and materials." https://www.aps.org/policy/statements/99_6.cfm
  12. 15.

    Transparency & Open Science Donoho, D. et al. (2009) “Reproducible

    research in computational harmonic analysis,” Computing in Science and Engineering Vol. 11(1):8–18.
  13. 16.

    Data and Code Sharing Recommendations ‣ assign a unique identifier

    to every version of the data and code ‣ describe in each publication the computing environment used ‣ use open licenses and non-proprietary formats ‣ publish under open-access conditions (and/or post pre-prints)
  14. 17.

    Open-source licenses: People can coordinate their work freely, within the

    confines of copyright law, while making access and wide distribution a priority.
  15. 19.
  16. 21.

    “The key is prevention via the training of more people

    on techniques for data analysis and reproducible research.” Leek & Peng, PNAS 2015
  17. 24.

    A syllabus for research computing 1. command line utilities in

    Unix/Linux 2. an open-source scientific software ecosystem (our favorite is Python's) 3. software version control (we like the distributed kind: our favorite is git / GitHub) 4. good practices for scientific software development: code hygiene and testing 5. knowledge of licensing options for sharing software https://barbagroup.github.io/essential_skills_RRC/
  18. 26.
  19. 27.

    Community & Leadership … clustering of similar areas of interest

    that allows for interaction, sharing, dialoguing, and thinking together —George Siemens, 2004
  20. 28.
  21. 29.

    ReproPacks For main results in a paper, we share data,

    plotting script & figure under CC-BY. File bundle with input data, running scripts, plotting scripts, and figure. We cite our own figure in the caption!
  22. 30.

    NSF SI2 PI Workshop 2017 How to run a lab

    for reproducible research @LorenaABarba