Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Failing in Rust
Search
Armin Ronacher
April 24, 2018
Programming
5
910
Failing in Rust
A quick talk at a meetup about using failure.
Armin Ronacher
April 24, 2018
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Armin Ronacher
See All by Armin Ronacher
The Catch in Rye: Seeding Change and Lessons Learned
mitsuhiko
0
220
Runtime Objects in Rust
mitsuhiko
0
320
Rust at Sentry
mitsuhiko
0
360
Overcoming Variable Payloads to Optimize for Performance
mitsuhiko
0
150
Rust API Design Learnings
mitsuhiko
0
470
The Snowball Effect of Open Source
mitsuhiko
0
310
Mobile Games are Living Organisms, Too
mitsuhiko
0
210
We gave a Mouse an NDK
mitsuhiko
0
780
Debug is the new Release
mitsuhiko
1
580
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
フロントエンドのディレクトリ構成どうしてる? Feature-Sliced Design 導入体験談
osakatechlab
8
4.1k
CSC509 Lecture 14
javiergs
PRO
0
130
短期間での新規プロダクト開発における「コスパの良い」Goのテスト戦略」 / kamakura.go
n3xem
2
160
42 best practices for Symfony, a decade later
tucksaun
1
180
「Chatwork」Android版アプリを 支える単体テストの現在
okuzawats
0
180
The Efficiency Paradox and How to Save Yourself and the World
hollycummins
1
440
Monixと常駐プログラムの勘どころ / Scalaわいわい勉強会 #4
stoneream
0
270
menu基盤チームによるGoogle Cloudの活用事例~Application Integration, Cloud Tasks編~
yoshifumi_ishikura
0
110
Criando Commits Incríveis no Git
marcelgsantos
2
170
Symfony Mapper Component
soyuka
2
730
rails statsで大解剖 🔍 “B/43流” のRailsの育て方を歴史とともに振り返ります
shoheimitani
2
930
rails stats で紐解く ANDPAD のイマを支える技術たち
andpad
1
290
Featured
See All Featured
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
38
7k
A Philosophy of Restraint
colly
203
16k
Building Your Own Lightsaber
phodgson
103
6.1k
The Psychology of Web Performance [Beyond Tellerrand 2023]
tammyeverts
45
2.2k
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
65
17k
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
marcelosomers
232
17k
JavaScript: Past, Present, and Future - NDC Porto 2020
reverentgeek
47
5.1k
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
175
9.4k
Templates, Plugins, & Blocks: Oh My! Creating the theme that thinks of everything
marktimemedia
28
2.1k
Being A Developer After 40
akosma
87
590k
Why You Should Never Use an ORM
jnunemaker
PRO
54
9.1k
How STYLIGHT went responsive
nonsquared
95
5.2k
Transcript
Failing in Rust Armin @mitsuhiko Ronacher
None
800°C 36° 2' 0.4662" N 118° 15' 38.7792" W 795°C
789°C 797°C 793°C 805°C 782°C we show you your crashes
— Robert F. Kennedy “Only those who dare to fail
greatly can ever achieve greatly.”
Why do we care?
Errors are Important • Errors are part of your API
• Exceptions let you forget about this easily • A lot more relevant when you can catch them and there are multiple versions of libraries involved
ways to fail greatly
Mechanisms •Result<T, E> •Option<T> •panic!
Result Propagation vs Panic • Results/Options are for handling •
panics are for recovering at best
Examples of Panics • out of bound access • runtime
Examples of Option • safe signalling absence of data •
"the one obvious error"
— Douglas Adams
But when you do •panic!("…"); •unreachable!();
let's talk results
But if you don't panic … how do you result?
fn square_a_number() -> Result<f32, E> { let num = get_a_random_float()?;
Ok(num * num) }
let val = expr?;
let val = match Try::into_result(expr) { Ok(v) => v, Err(e)
=> return Try::from_error(From::from(e)); };
error propagation can be hooked!
The Err in Result can be anything :-/
So let's use some traits for Err
pub trait Error: Debug + Display { fn description(&self) ->
&str; fn cause(&self) -> Option<&Error>; }
impl Error + 'static { pub fn downcast_ref<T>(&self) -> Option<&T>
where T: Error + 'static; }
— Charles Darwin “To kill std::error is as good a
service as, and sometimes even better than, the establishing of a new trait”
Problems • Generic errors give no guarantees • no Send
/ Sync / Debug • causes() returns non static errors • description() is useless • no backtraces
Enter Failure
— Winston Churchill “Success consists of going from std::error to
failure without loss of enthusiasm”
some std errors are fails nice! impl<E> Fail for E
where E: StdError + Send + Sync + 'static
failure 0.1 ➠ failure 1.0
pub trait Fail: Display + Debug + Send + Sync
+ 'static { fn cause(&self) -> Option<&Fail>; fn backtrace(&self) -> Option<&Backtrace>; fn context<D>(self, context: D) -> Context<D> where D: Display + Send + Sync + 'static, Self: Sized; }
Fail can be derived
#[derive(Fail, Debug)] #[fail(display = "my failure happened")] pub struct MyFailure;
#[derive(Fail, Debug)] #[fail(display = "my failure happened")] pub struct MyFailure
{ backtrace: failure::Backtrace, }
#[derive(Fail, Debug)] #[fail(display = "my failure happened")] pub struct MyFailure
{ backtrace: failure::Backtrace, #[fail(cause)] io_cause: ::std::io::Error, }
Fail & Error
Fail ⟷ Error
Fail for libraries Error for applications
What's in the Package
Main Functionality • Fail trait • Error type • Context
Bonus Points • Fail works with no_std • Fail works
with many std::errors • error-chain is deprecating itself for failure • actix and others are already using it!
— rustc an Error is not a Fail
failure 0.1: error.cause() failure 1.0: error.as_fail() Error to &Fail
Examples
#[derive(Debug, Fail, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)] #[fail(display = "invalid value
for project id")] pub struct ProjectIdParseError; Parse Errors
#[derive(Debug, Fail)] pub enum DsnParseError { #[fail(display = "no valid
url provided")] InvalidUrl, #[fail(display = "no valid scheme")] InvalidScheme, #[fail(display = "username is empty")] NoUsername, #[fail(display = "no project id")] NoProjectId, #[fail(display = "invalid project id")] InvalidProjectId(#[fail(cause)] ProjectIdParseError), } Complex Parse Errors
fn parse(url: Url) -> Result<Dsn, DsnParseError> { let project_id: i64
= url.path() .trim_matches('/') .parse() .map_err(DsnParseError::InvalidProjectId)?; Ok(Dsn { project_id }) } Mapping Errors
#[derive(Debug, Fail, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash)] pub enum ErrorKind
{ #[fail(display = "governor spawn failed")] TroveGovernSpawnFailed, #[fail(display = "governor shutdown failed")] TroveGovernShutdownFailed, } Error Kinds
#[derive(Debug)] pub struct Error { inner: Context<ErrorKind>, } Custom Errors
impl Fail for Error { fn cause(&self) -> Option<&Fail> {
self.inner.cause() } fn backtrace(&self) -> Option<&Backtrace> { self.inner.backtrace() } } impl fmt::Display for Error { fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result { fmt::Display::fmt(&self.inner, f) } } Error Pass Through
pub fn run(config: Config) -> Result<(), Error> { let trove
= Arc::new(Trove::new(config)); trove.govern().context(ErrorKind::TroveGovernSpawnFailed)?; // … } Example Usage
use failure::{Error, ResultExt}; pub fn attach_logfile(&mut self, logfile: &str) ->
Result<(), Error> { let f = fs::File::open(logfile) .context("Could not open logfile")?; let reader = BufReader::new(f); for line in reader.lines() { let line = line?; User Facing with Error
A person who never made a mistake never had to
write an error API
?