F ( ) ≃ 89.5% December 20, 2024 16 [zhang 19] Danger-pose detection system using commodity Wi-Fi for bathroom monitoring, Sensors, 19(4) https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040884 CSI Illustration by Storyset
server used in our experiment, and (b) configuration of TX, RX, and bathtub. For the dangerous situation simulation, we assumed three dangerous situations as shown in Figure 9: (1) keep the lying position in a long time, (2) sink the whole body below the water surface, and (3) sink the face below the water surface. The danger-pose detection system is used to detect dangerous situations when taking a bath. Although target dangerous situations are not limited to the three simulated situations, we conducted evaluations with these three situations to demonstrate the basic performance of our system as an initial evaluation. (a) (b) (c) Figure 9. Simulated three dangerous situations: (a) steady lying position, (b) the whole body sinks below the water surface, and (c) the face sinks below the water surface. We collected CSI data at a rate of 20 Hz on channel 40 in a 5-GHz band for couple of hours on six different days during a three-month period. During the three-month period, environmental changes including location of furniture and daily objects have been occurred. Locations of transmitter and receiver might also include errors up to approximately 10 centimeters as we put transmitter and receiver on each of the six days. For not in bath, safe, and danger activities, we collected 119,324, 288,291, and 21,572 CSI data samples, respectively, in total in six days. [zhang 19] Danger-pose detection system using commodity Wi-Fi for bathroom monitoring, Sensors, 19(4) https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040884
December 20, 2024 19 [uchino 20] Initial Design of Two-Stage Acoustic Vehicle Detection System for High Traffic Roads, PerVehicle, IEEE PerCom Workshop TP 133 132 265 FN 165 179 344 FP 81 80 161 Precision 0.62 0.62 0.62 Recall 0.45 0.42 0.44 F-measure 0.52 0.50 0.51 harmonic mean of precision and recall, which provides a comprehensive evaluation of the classifier. B. Detection Performance Table I shows the system performance, i.e., the number of TP, FN, and FP detections as well as the calculated precision, recall, and F-measure for ✓t = 1.5s. • The precision of the proposed Two-Stage Acoustic Ve- hicle Detection System is 0.76, 14 points higher than SAVeD. By resetting the detection window in the Post- Fitting block and detecting vehicles using only sound map points in the neighborhood of the estimated vehicle passing time, the amount of FP detections was reduced. • The recall of 0.53 is a 9-point improvement compared to previous work. This is due to the system’s ability to make use of all the sound map points corresponding to a given vehicle. • The F-measure of 0.63 is 12 points higher than SAVeD. The relatively low F-measures exhibited by both the Two- Stage Acoustic Vehicle Detection System and SAVeD are due to their low recall values compared to their precision values. As the number of simultaneously passing vehicles increases, the number of sound map points corresponding to a single vehicle decreases because only one point is drawn on the sound map at each time step. As a result, the S-curve becomes sparse, increasing the probability of a FN detection. • The Two-Stage Acoustic Vehicle Detection System de- Fig. 10. Proposed system F-measure as a function of passing time error margin ✓t Microphone setup location Fig. 11. System monitoring viewpoint The above results show that our Two-Stage Acoustic Vehicle Detection System is an improvement over the SAVeD in terms of vehicle detection performance. C. Passing Time Error The detection performance of our system depends strongly on the estimated passing time used in the Post-Fitting block. As described in Section IV-A, the smaller the passing time error margin ✓ts, the higher the number of FP detections. It is therefore important to examine the influence of the passing time error margin on detection performance. Figure 10 shows the F-measures for ✓t between 0.5 s and 2.0 s. The F-measure starts to increase at about ✓t = 0.6 s and stabilizes around ✓t = 1.2 s. The optimum value of ✓t corresponds to the point at which the F-measure just begins to stabilize, as a too large value of ✓t will cause the system
[wang 17] ➔ n p FUSIC [jiokeng 20], SpotFi [kotaru 15] ➔ December 20, 2024 30 [sen 12] You are facing the Mona Lisa: Spot localization using PHY layer information, ACM MobiSys [wang 16] CSI phase fingerprinnting for indoor localization with a deep learning approach, IEEE Internet Things J., 3(6) [wang 17] CSI-based fingerprinting for indoor localization: A deep learrning approach, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 66(1) [jiokeng 20] When FTM discovered MUSIC: Accurate WiFi-based ranging in the presence of multipath, IEEE INFOCOM [kotaru 15] SpotFi: decimeter level localization using WiFi, ACM SIGCOMM CC Review
= NH/OP + DN/OP + LV/ OP + BD/OP December 20, 2024 35 Dataset (5 min each) Abbrv Human walking in Doors No human w/ opened doors NH/OP Opened No human w/ closed doors NH/CL Closed Dining room w/ opened doors DN/OP Dining room Opened Dining room w/ closed doors DN/CL Dining room Closed Living room w/ opened doors LV/OP Living room Opened Living room w/ closed doors LV/CL Living room Closed Bedroom w/ opened doors BD/OP Bedroom Opened Bedroom w/ closed doors BD/CL Bedroom Closed
= 1 ARI=0.943 l 𝑁1234 = 2 ARI=0.991 l 𝑁1234 ≥ 4 ARI=1.00 p PCA p Random December 20, 2024 47 0 2 4 6 8 10 Nsamp 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Mean ARI ICA PCA Random 44.4%