Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Artur Hebda "Code is not important...or is it?"
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Railsware
June 03, 2018
Technology
170
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Artur Hebda "Code is not important...or is it?"
Artur's presentation at RubyC-2018
Railsware
June 03, 2018
More Decks by Railsware
See All by Railsware
Калыс Осмонов: "B-Tree vs. LSM-Tree: какую систему БД использовать для следующего проекта"
railsware
0
520
Sergii Boiko: "Runtime Model of Ruby, JavaScript, Erlang, and Other Popular Languages"
railsware
0
230
Outsourcing - is a Dead End. Strategic steps on how to evolve your business model.
railsware
1
910
Artur Hebda: Product Engineer - a perfect technical executor for cross-functional teams
railsware
0
450
"How to structure your input so it becomes a manageable scope?" - workshop by Artur Hebda
railsware
0
1k
How to Extract Tabular Data from Scanned PDF's?
railsware
0
5.1k
Runtime Model of Ruby, JavaScript, Erlang, and other popular languages
railsware
0
210
BDD style testing for Swift with Sleipnir
railsware
2
280
Building up the product: who you need and when
railsware
0
660
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
インシデント事例と パッケージの全量解析に学ぶ ソフトウェアサプライチェーンの守り方 / supply-chain-attack-defense
flatt_security
0
150
AIレビューはどこまで任せられるのか?自動化と人が背負うレビューの境界
sansantech
PRO
3
1.1k
Genie Ontologyは銀の弾丸かを考える / Is Genie Ontology a Silver Bullet?
nttcom
0
420
知らん間に、回ってる
ming_ayami
0
740
ヘルスケア領域における AI 活用と その安全性担保のための取り組み (Leveraging AI in Healthcare and Our Efforts to Ensure Its Safety) - Google I/O Extended Tokyo 2026, July 11, 2026
zettaittenani
0
430
しくみを学んで使いこなそう GitHub Copilot app
torumakabe
2
290
データエンジニアリングとドメイン駆動設計
masuda220
PRO
4
210
2年前に削除したPHPクラスが、 ある日突然決済をエラーにした
ykagano
1
500
Alphaモジュール使っていいのかい!?いけないのかい!?どっちなんだいっ!?
watany
1
290
AI x 開発生産性を取り巻く予算戦略と投資対効果
i35_267
1
280
AI Native なプロダクト組織の立ち上げ方 : 生産性 100 倍への挑戦
mikesorae
0
230
関数型の考えを TypeScript に持ち込んで、テストしやすい純粋関数を増やす / Pure at the Core, Effects at the Edge: Bringing Functional Thinking into TypeScript
kaminashi
2
130
Featured
See All Featured
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
55
3.4k
Navigating Algorithm Shifts & AI Overviews - #SMXNext
aleyda
1
1.4k
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
21
3.8k
How to Talk to Developers About Accessibility
jct
2
410
Ten Tips & Tricks for a 🌱 transition
stuffmc
0
150
B2B Lead Gen: Tactics, Traps & Triumph
marketingsoph
0
170
So, you think you're a good person
axbom
PRO
2
2.1k
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
74
20k
DBのスキルで生き残る技術 - AI時代におけるテーブル設計の勘所
soudai
PRO
67
56k
Bridging the Design Gap: How Collaborative Modelling removes blockers to flow between stakeholders and teams @FastFlow conf
baasie
0
620
How GitHub (no longer) Works
holman
316
150k
Conquering PDFs: document understanding beyond plain text
inesmontani
PRO
4
2.9k
Transcript
Code is not important… Artur Hebda Railsware Labs or is
it?
Context of code Product story Building vision Growing structure Pro
t-d i n me k }
We’re not hired to just write code.
Image: https://www.washingtontimes.com Not available for 6 hours +6500 calls discarded
11 mln people affected Reason : counter overflow 911 outage in USA
“Software engineers don’t understand the problem they’re trying to solve,
and don’t care to. Nancy Leveson, Software-safety expert, MIT
Code always exists within a product context.
Customers pay for the value product delivers to them.
“It’s great to rewrite your code and make it cleaner
and by the third time it’ll actually be pretty. But that’s not the point. Joel Spolsky
We’re hired to build & ship products.
Context of code Product story Building vision Growing structure Pro
t-d i n me k }
Motivation behind OrgMap What is going on?
Q : How it?
Q : How il s i on ?
Q : How su e?
Q : Wha t e t p e? +
+ + +
Seems strange… right? We used existing services / hack our
way through We leveraged product development through experiments We closed feature loops ... And eventually built our own product
“I don't know how to do this, so let's do
it the simplest way and we'll figure out.
Image: http://www.freeimages.co.uk Experiment to build something people want.
We have $50k of tech debt We embraced it to
learn a lot through experiments over the years Image: http://xarxanet.org
Context of code Product story Building vision Growing structure Pro
t-d i n me k }
Building vision constantly
Image: http://www.orlandospencer.com Product is a never consistent set of features
Split product into feature components
Have as much vision as you can Gather product group
Short-term / mid-term / long-term Based on current knowledge For each component
Short-term http://www.donsmaps.com/images29/middleearthlarg elargerstill.jpg Image: http://www.donsmaps.com
Make educated guess I think it would be good to
do...
Validate hypothesis with experiments A C B D
Natural tendency to predict further direction A C B D
E?
Refine vision A C B D Wrong Correct
A C B D Wrong Correct inflexibility Refine vision
Mid-term http://www.donsmaps.com/images29/middleearthlarg elargerstill.jpg Image: http://www.donsmaps.com
Customers ask for a feature I really need that.
“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would
have said: faster horses... Henry Ford
Q : Res t u s em t ?
Combined features
Demo - measure what is changing I like it, but
maybe if…
Long-term http://www.donsmaps.com/images29/middleearthlarg elargerstill.jpg Image: http://www.donsmaps.com
Actual customer validated stuff Usage ~ long-term
Context of code Product story Building vision Growing structure Pro
t-d i n me k }
Grow supporting structure Image: https://www.autodesk.com
“Good code (...) provides highest value for the lowest cost.
99 Bottles of OOP by Sandi Metz and Katrina Owen
Assess tech compliance to vision Gather tech leadership group Look
at architecture for each feature component See how it complies / supports vision
Increase code quality and structure rigidity as you head towards
long-term
Build experimental structure for short-term vision Get answers Acquire knowledge
Image: http://freeimages.com
Improve structure for mid-term vision Clean up after experiments Reflect
acquired knowledge Image: https://www.bonsaiempire.com
Build rigid structure for long-term vision Image: https://www.maxpixel.net Stabilize and
scale
Maintain reasonable code quality for everything Low quality will slow
you down Code without tests is harder to refactor Automate code quality assessment Automate processes - CI & CD
99 Bottles of OOP by S. Metz & K. Owen
https://www.sandimetz.com/99bottles/
Practice thorough PR reviews Do self-review before asking someone else
Assess what cannot be automated yet Review like you would have to continue working on that right away
Reduce tech debt for the vision one step at a
time
What is tech debt? Not only TODO and FIXME Rem
r i l il ?
Make tech debt transparent Image: http://stocksmasters.com
Prioritise tech debt 5.times { why? }
Handle tech debt from backlog
“Make the change easy (warning: this may be hard), then
make the easy change. Kent Beck
Boy Scout Rule - now or later?
Do not refactor without vision
“You should not reach for abstractions (...) resist them until
they absolutely insist upon being created. 99 Bottles of OOP by Sandi Metz and Katrina Owen
Give yourself enough flexibility
Have strategic discussions Rails? React?
Summary Code exists in a product context, hence supports it
Use product vision as a guidance for code Prefer understandability and let abstractions emerge Address inflexibility where it matters
One more thing...
So… is code important or not?
So… is code important or not? As important as value
it creates.
Thank you! Questions? Follow @railsware
Thank you! Questions? Follow @railsware
Thank you! Questions? Follow @railsware