$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »

Go @ Skimlinks

Go @ Skimlinks

A quick run through how we came to use Go at Skimlinks, the success we've had with it challenges we faced.

Richard Johnson

May 31, 2013
Tweet

More Decks by Richard Johnson

Other Decks in Programming

Transcript

  1. Go @ Skimlinks Blood, sweat and code.

  2. Who is this guy anyway? Richard Johnson @rjohnsondev github.com/rjohnsondev Lead

    Engineer, Skimlinks
  3. Skimlinks • I joined almost 2 years ago • We

    had poor server utilisation! ◦ Memory constrained PHP under apache prefork • Wanted to move onto something else ◦ Cue language war ◦ Cue Bake-off: http://blog.skimlinks.com/2012/03/15/api-programming-language-bake-off/
  4. • Go sucked. ◦ Why? ▪ Early revision? ▪ I

    coded it wrong? • Scala rocked ◦ Why? ▪ JVM? ▪ I probably coded it wrong • We chose Python & Tornado. • ... and I never looked at Go again. Results....
  5. Enter Skimwords! • Acquired NLP tech from a startup in

    the US • Mostly written in C (!) • During review I noticed a potential algorithm improvement! ◦ Mocked it up in my own time using Go ▪ Needed to be fast & low-level (replacing C) ▪ No concurrency requirements (unlike APIs) ◦ Results were so compelling I presented them to management • We halved our Skimwords server costs.
  6. But still challenges... • The C code was complex, brittle

    and difficult • Business requirements: ◦ Better phrase generation with different "engines" ▪ Hired a new NLP & AI wizard (Ian) ◦ Formalise assessment of phrases & matching • Everything was pointing to us needing to split up our system into smaller components
  7. ... so we did • Re-implemented logical components in Go

    • ZMQ over IPC as communication layer ◦ Decent Go bindings (for ZMQ == 2.2) • JSON & go types as protocol ◦ Lovely native marshalling • Still needed some external C libraries ◦ C? Go? CGo... well... go! ◦ Snowball stemmer ◦ Judy Arrays
  8. also ... • We run everything under supervisord ◦ Just

    really convenient • RPM packaged binaries ◦ Single, portable binaries FTW! • Puppet based deploys • EC2 cloud infrastructure • It just works!
  9. ... • BTW, I created a little vim compiler plugin...

  10. A couple of months later... • 30% speed increase •

    Fixed a lot of difficult C heisenbugs • Better precision • QA gave it the all clear • Turned it on for 10% of traffic. ◦ Disaster!!!! ◦ After about 3 mins, stack would freeze for about 3 seconds, causing requests to timeout and upstream services to become overloaded.
  11. WTF??!!!!????* • Our product index contained about 50 million objects

    & 14GB RAM • Go 1.0 garbage collection ◦ Mark & Sweep all objects ◦ STOPS THE WORLD! • Moved objects into C with CGo ◦ No more sweeps ◦ Reduced memory usage by about 3GB • Stopped using runtime.SetFinalizer ◦ Freeing memory as we went made things less jerky
  12. Disaster! (part 2) • We increased our index size by

    a third. • Started getting errors: "out of memory" • Oh, Go programs can't be > 16GB ◦ Oh, right, fine.... hang on, wat??? • Started running patched Go in production! ◦ Really, really, really bad idea. ◦ Got away with it (most memory was unmanaged) • Thankfully, 1.1 was in beta, no memory limit! ◦ Started running that, which rapidly evolved to 1.1 ◦ Faster as well!
  13. Disaster! (part 3) • Code stopped compiling!! • Worked fine

    locally, but not on Jenkins! • Libraries changed under our feet! ◦ "go get" is cute and all, but: ◦ Go builds libraries once & keeps locally! • Easy fixes (thankfully) • Fork your libraries!!
  14. The story at present... • We've been using Go in

    production for almost a year (alongside C stack) • Complete Go (with some python) stack live for 3 months. • IMHO is Go a production ready language? ◦ Yes! Well... Mostly ▪ GC still warrants some improvement ▪ Most libraries are "hobby" projects, expect to pick up some maintenance effort
  15. What's next for us? • Error tracking and reporting ◦

    Log4go -> Raven Go -> Sentry ▪ Still some issues to resolve with high volumes ◦ http://riemann.io/ for stats! ▪ Seems to work well, live over UDP on all boxes • More improvements! ◦ Incorporation of user intent values ◦ Pluggable & A/B tested product relevance algorithms
  16. Other questions? Richard Johnson @rjohnsondev http://github.com/rjohnsondev Lead Engineer, Skimlinks Quick

    shout-out to http://apiaxle.com/