Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
RuhrJS 2016: InchJS
Search
René Föhring
July 02, 2016
Programming
0
68
RuhrJS 2016: InchJS
René Föhring
July 02, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by René Föhring
See All by René Föhring
ElixirConf.EU 2016: Credo - Analysing ASTs for Fun and Profit
rrrene
0
1.6k
ElixirRuhr.001: Good Tooling educates
rrrene
3
380
EuRuKo 2015: One Inch at a Time - How to get People excited about Inline Docs
rrrene
4
2.3k
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
TestingOsaka6_Ozono
o3
0
270
AI 駆動開発ライフサイクル(AI-DLC):ソフトウェアエンジニアリングの再構築 / AI-DLC Introduction
kanamasa
11
5.2k
Unicodeどうしてる? PHPから見たUnicode対応と他言語での対応についてのお伺い
youkidearitai
PRO
0
420
AI Agent Dojo #4: watsonx Orchestrate ADK体験
oniak3ibm
PRO
0
120
AI時代を生き抜く 新卒エンジニアの生きる道
coconala_engineer
1
520
実はマルチモーダルだった。ブラウザの組み込みAI🧠でWebの未来を感じてみよう #jsfes #gemini
n0bisuke2
3
1.4k
AIエージェントの設計で注意するべきポイント6選
har1101
6
3k
AtCoder Conference 2025「LLM時代のAHC」
imjk
2
650
Navigation 3: 적응형 UI를 위한 앱 탐색
fornewid
1
530
PostgreSQLで手軽にDuckDBを使う!DuckDB&pg_duckdb入門/osc25hi-duckdb
takahashiikki
0
240
The Art of Re-Architecture - Droidcon India 2025
siddroid
0
160
Go コードベースの構成と AI コンテキスト定義
andpad
0
160
Featured
See All Featured
Improving Core Web Vitals using Speculation Rules API
sergeychernyshev
21
1.3k
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
21
3.6k
Navigating Weather and Climate Data
rabernat
0
67
The Organizational Zoo: Understanding Human Behavior Agility Through Metaphoric Constructive Conversations (based on the works of Arthur Shelley, Ph.D)
kimpetersen
PRO
0
210
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
55
9.4k
Money Talks: Using Revenue to Get Sh*t Done
nikkihalliwell
0
130
Darren the Foodie - Storyboard
khoart
PRO
2
2.1k
The agentic SEO stack - context over prompts
schlessera
0
580
Understanding Cognitive Biases in Performance Measurement
bluesmoon
32
2.8k
Test your architecture with Archunit
thirion
1
2.1k
Visualization
eitanlees
150
16k
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
180
10k
Transcript
How to get people excited about inline docs. InchJS René
Föhring // @rrrene inch-ci.org
How to get people excited about inline docs. InchJS René
Föhring // @rrrene inch-ci.org
@rrrene
@rrrene (read in pirate voice)
@rrrene (read in pirate voice) Coder @ Neopoly
https://www.neopoly.com/jobs/
https://www.neopoly.com/jobs/
https://www.neopoly.com/jobs/
Inline Docs?
// TODO: write some docs // function hash(filenameOrBlob, mode =
nil) { }
// Returns a hash for a given `filenameOrBlob`. // //
hash(filename) // => "68ac9064904d853a037a7a8f" function hash(filenameOrBlob, mode) { }
// Returns a hash for a given `filenameOrBlob`. // //
hash(filename) // => "68ac9064904d853a037a7a8f" function hash(filenameOrBlob, mode) { } free-form
/** * Generates a hash for a given `filenameOrBlob`. *
* @example * hash(filename) * => "68ac9064904d853a037a7a8f“ * * @param filenameOrBlob [String] the filename * @param mode [String,null] optional mode * @return [String,null] */ function hash(filenameOrBlob, mode) { } JSDoc
// Public: Generates a hash for the blob. // //
filenameOrBlob – filename or blob // mode - Optional mode (defaults to "SHA1") // // Examples // // size(filename) // => "68ac9064904d853a037a7a8f“ // // Returns String or null. function hash(filenameOrBlob, mode) { } TomDoc
(ง ͠° ͟ل ͜ ͡°)ง But what is the problem?
„good code is its own documentation“ (based on my early
twenties) versus „people are not JavaScript parsers“ (based on Zach Holman)
None
Tooling helps! because, there must be tools, right?
„There are 0 lines of documentation.“ or „65.7% documented“
Look, here are the facts.
Designing Inch Let‘s create a more opinionated tool.
First, let‘s make up some rules.
it is more important to document … longer functions than
short ones
it is more important to document … longer functions than
short ones functions with many parameters
it is more important to document … longer functions than
short ones functions with many parameters modules exporting functions
it is more important to document … longer functions than
short ones functions with many parameters modules containing functions ...
code objects ordered by priority 6 5 4 2 1
0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -7
code objects ordered by priority 6 5 4 2 1
0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -7
# These rules provide priorities for all # code objects.
const codeObjects = [ functions parameters ]; # ... which are also assigned a score. const scores = [0, 100];
# Called by the `initech` service. # # @return [undefined]
function userRegistered(username, _) { } Score: ? Priority: ?
# Called by the `initech` service. # # @return [undefined]
function userRegistered(username, _) { } Score: 90/100 Priority:
# Called by the `initech` service. # # @return [undefined]
function userRegistered(username, _) { } Score: 90/100 Priority:
# Called by the `initech` service. # # @return [undefined]
function userRegistered(username, _) { } Grade: A Priority:
>> require('grade_list').getAll() A – Really good B – Proper documentation
found C – Please take a look U – Undocumented (not a bad thing)
>> CLI _
# Properly documented, could be improved: ┃ 50 4 Foo#initialize
┃ 50 4 Foo.Bar # Please take a look: ┃ 37 4 Foo.API#initialize ┃ 25 2 Foo.CodeObject#initialize # Undocumented: ┃ 0 4 Foo.CLI ┃ 0 4 Foo.API#send_request
# Properly documented, could be improved: ┃ B ↑ Foo#initialize
┃ B ↑ Foo.Bar # Please take a look: ┃ C ↑ Foo.API#initialize ┃ C ↗ Foo.CodeObject#initialize # Undocumented: ┃ U ↑ Foo.CLI ┃ U ↑ Foo.API#send_request
>> inch suggest
>> inch suggest
>> inch list
>> inch show OBJECT_NAME
>> CLI !!!
>> CLI !!! but how to get people excited about
this?
BADGES
None
U C B A
None
None
None
None
2100x
2100x Ruby, JS & Elixir
The Things I learned
#1 Software is about people
#2 Be passionate about your ideas
#3 Be brave enough to build your own tools
The End (srsly, please help improving ES6 support)