Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Agile documentation
Search
Sponsored
·
Ship Features Fearlessly
Turn features on and off without deploys. Used by thousands of Ruby developers.
→
Soenke Ruempler
May 05, 2013
Programming
560
0
Share
Agile documentation
Soenke Ruempler
May 05, 2013
More Decks by Soenke Ruempler
See All by Soenke Ruempler
Software migration strategies
s0enke
2
720
Make it SOLID. Software Architecture for System Administrators
s0enke
1
150
Agile documentation
s0enke
1
420
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
今こそ押さえておきたい アマゾンウェブサービス(AWS)の データベースの基礎 おもクラ #6版
satoshi256kbyte
1
240
我々はなぜ「層」を分けるのか〜「関心の分離」と「抽象化」で手に入れる変更に強いシンプルな設計〜 #phperkaigi / PHPerKaigi 2026
shogogg
2
910
GNU Makeの使い方 / How to use GNU Make
kaityo256
PRO
16
5.6k
Offline should be the norm: building local-first apps with CRDTs & Kotlin Multiplatform
renaudmathieu
0
190
Symfonyの特性(設計思想)を手軽に活かす特性(trait)
ickx
0
130
Nuxt Server Components
wattanx
0
260
PHPで TLSのプロトコルを実装してみるをもう一度しゃべりたい
higaki_program
0
190
Vibe하게 만드는 Flutter GenUI App With ADK , 박제창, BWAI Incheon 2026
itsmedreamwalker
0
550
仕様漏れ実装漏れをなくすトレーサビリティAI基盤のご紹介
orgachem
PRO
9
5.5k
UIの境界線をデザインする | React Tokyo #15 メイントーク
sasagar
1
260
PHPのバージョンアップ時にも役立ったAST(2026年版)
matsuo_atsushi
0
300
へんな働き方
yusukebe
6
2.9k
Featured
See All Featured
DBのスキルで生き残る技術 - AI時代におけるテーブル設計の勘所
soudai
PRO
64
53k
ピンチをチャンスに:未来をつくるプロダクトロードマップ #pmconf2020
aki_iinuma
128
55k
The Power of CSS Pseudo Elements
geoffreycrofte
82
6.2k
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
22k
Accessibility Awareness
sabderemane
0
97
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1032
470k
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
74
20k
Redefining SEO in the New Era of Traffic Generation
szymonslowik
1
270
The #1 spot is gone: here's how to win anyway
tamaranovitovic
2
1k
Building an army of robots
kneath
306
46k
Designing for Performance
lara
611
70k
Speed Design
sergeychernyshev
33
1.6k
Transcript
Agile Documentation PHP Unconference EU, 2013-05-05 Soenke Ruempler
About me "Chief Trolling Officer" at Jimdo Passionate about the
web, open source, agile software development and knowledge management (and everything combined) Twitter: @s0enke Blog: http://ruempler.eu/
About Jimdo • WYSIWYG Website creator in 12 languages •
currently 8 million registrations • ~150 employees in Offices in Hamburg, San Fransisco, Shanghai, Tokyo
We are hiring!
Agenda - What to expect? • What can be documented
in software engineering and IT operations • Documentation antipatterns • Documentation patterns • Agile documentation to the extreme!
None
Rules • Listen • Ask whenever you want • Think
• Discuss - it's a highly controversial topic!
What can be documented in Software Development and Operations?
Domain knowledge
Requirements knowledge
Code / API Documentation
High level architectural diagrams
Experience reports
Application specific knowledge
Test results
Processes (Not handled in this talk)
Antipatterns
Outdated documentation
Documentation not known / not found / not read
Documentation not written (?)
Too much documentation
Documentation of discussions, not stable states
Wrong focus, does not document intent
WTF???? Intention? Why is it an "extreme geloet"? https://github.com/s0enke/dropr/blob/master/classes/Client/Peer/HttpUpload.php#L101
"Tests are enough documentation" (?)
Documentation for the sake of documentation
We like enterprise conventions for documents!
None
Patterns and Criteria for successful Documentation
Document results, not discussions
http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/agileDocumentation.htm
Information proximity
http://heather.sh/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Neat-Whiteboard-Diagram.jpg
None
Single sourcing
http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/singleSourceInformation.htm
http://plantuml.sourceforge.net/index.html
http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/
None
<img src="http://yuml.me/diagram/scruffy/class/[Wages]^-[Salaried], [Wages]^-[Contractor]" >
Also document the "why"
In order to <rationale> As a <role> I want <what>
User story!
"In order to ..."
Prefer executable specs over static documentation
None
Value of documentation vs. costs of documentation
Business value low high Total cost of ownership low high
Wikis Executable High level feature / behavior specs (e. g. cucumber) Static documents Unit tests
None
And in the devops world? (Some examples)
rspec for configuration management
puppet-rspec Aha! Rationale! But Why? But Why?
cucumber-nagios
Ecosystem documentaion as code!
Rationale / Business value Executable Specification of the feature
Rationale / Business value Executable Specification of the feature Monitors:
Working Jimdo website, Login, Upload to webserver, Background-Upload to S3, and S3 ;-)
Living documentation
Single source information! \o/
Never outdated! \o/
Fast feedback \o/
Business value, Intention and rationale are clear. \o/
None
?
Links and Literature • My diploma thesis • Scott Ambler
on Agile Documentation • Specification by Example • cucumber-nagios • "Software Engineering Rationale: Wissen über Software erheben und erhalten"