Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Agile documentation
Search
Sponsored
·
Ship Features Fearlessly
Turn features on and off without deploys. Used by thousands of Ruby developers.
→
Soenke Ruempler
May 14, 2013
Programming
420
1
Share
Agile documentation
Soenke Ruempler
May 14, 2013
More Decks by Soenke Ruempler
See All by Soenke Ruempler
Software migration strategies
s0enke
2
730
Make it SOLID. Software Architecture for System Administrators
s0enke
1
160
Agile documentation
s0enke
0
570
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Cache-moi si tu peux : patterns et pièges du cache en production - Devoxx France 2026 - Conférence
slecache
0
320
AI-DLC Deep Dive
yuukiyo
9
5.2k
GNU Makeの使い方 / How to use GNU Make
kaityo256
PRO
16
5.6k
AIを導入する前にやるべきこと
negima
2
310
〜バイブコーディングを超えて〜 チームで実験し続けたAI駆動開発
tigertora7571
0
180
アクセシビリティ試験の"その後"を仕組み化する
yuuumiravy
1
180
SREに優しいTerraform構成 modulesとstateの組み方
hiyanger
2
160
Road to RubyKaigi: Play Hard(ware)
makicamel
1
520
Spec-driven Development: How AI Changes Everything (And Nothing)
simas
PRO
0
540
(Re)make Regexp in Ruby: Democratizing internals for the JIT
makenowjust
3
950
Claude Codeをカスタムして自分だけのClaude Codeを作ろう
terisuke
0
160
Liberating Ruby's Parser from Lexer Hacks
ydah
2
2.4k
Featured
See All Featured
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
75
12k
The B2B funnel & how to create a winning content strategy
katarinadahlin
PRO
1
340
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1032
470k
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
22k
The Invisible Side of Design
smashingmag
302
52k
How to audit for AI Accessibility on your Front & Back End
davetheseo
0
340
Paper Plane
katiecoart
PRO
1
49k
Navigating Team Friction
lara
192
16k
SEO in 2025: How to Prepare for the Future of Search
ipullrank
3
3.4k
Technical Leadership for Architectural Decision Making
baasie
3
350
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
528
40k
Reality Check: Gamification 10 Years Later
codingconduct
0
2.1k
Transcript
Agile Documentation PHP Usergroup Hamburg 2013-05-14 Soenke Ruempler
About me "Chief Trolling Officer" at Jimdo Passionate about the
web, open source, agile software development and knowledge management (and everything combined) Twitter: @s0enke Blog: http://ruempler.eu/
About Jimdo • WYSIWYG Website creator in 12 languages •
currently 8 million registrations • ~150 employees in Offices in Hamburg, San Fransisco, Shanghai, Tokyo
We are hiring!
Agenda - What to expect? • What can be documented
in software engineering and IT operations • Documentation antipatterns • Documentation patterns • Agile documentation to the extreme!
None
Rules • Listen • Ask whenever you want • Think
• Discuss - it's a highly controversial topic!
What can be documented in Software Development and Operations?
Domain knowledge
Requirements knowledge
Code / API Documentation
High level architectural diagrams
Experience reports
Application specific knowledge
Test results
Processes (Not handled in this talk)
Antipatterns
Outdated documentation
Documentation not known / not found / not read
Documentation not written (?)
Too much documentation
Documentation of discussions, not stable states
Wrong focus, does not document intent
WTF???? Intention? Why is it an "extreme geloet"? https://github.com/s0enke/dropr/blob/master/classes/Client/Peer/HttpUpload.php#L101
"Tests are enough documentation" (?)
Documentation for the sake of documentation
We like enterprise conventions for documents!
None
Patterns and Criteria for successful Documentation
Document results, not discussions
http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/agileDocumentation.htm
Information proximity
http://heather.sh/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Neat-Whiteboard-Diagram.jpg
None
Single sourcing
http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/singleSourceInformation.htm
http://plantuml.sourceforge.net/index.html
http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/
None
<img src="http://yuml.me/diagram/scruffy/class/[Wages]^-[Salaried], [Wages]^-[Contractor]" >
Also document the "why"
In order to <rationale> As a <role> I want <what>
User story!
"In order to ..."
Prefer executable specs over static documentation
None
Value of documentation vs. costs of documentation
Business value low high Total cost of ownership low high
Wikis Executable High level feature / behavior specs (e. g. cucumber) Static documents Unit tests
None
And in the devops world? (Some examples)
rspec for configuration management
puppet-rspec Aha! Rationale! But Why? But Why?
cucumber-nagios
Ecosystem documentaion as code!
Rationale / Business value Executable Specification of the feature
Rationale / Business value Executable Specification of the feature Monitors:
Working Jimdo website, Login, Upload to webserver, Background-Upload to S3, and S3 ;-)
Living documentation
Single source information! \o/
Never outdated! \o/
Fast feedback \o/
Business value, Intention and rationale are clear. \o/
None
?
Links and Literature • My diploma thesis • Scott Ambler
on Agile Documentation • Specification by Example • cucumber-nagios • "Software Engineering Rationale: Wissen über Software erheben und erhalten"