Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
How devops improved my dev
Search
Florian Gilcher
April 18, 2013
Programming
1.5k
5
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
How devops improved my dev
Florian Gilcher
April 18, 2013
Transcript
95 slides
None
None
The hotel wireless was terrible, sorry for the lack of
pictures.
$ whoami
$ whoami $ cat .profile | grep export export GIT_AUTHOR="Florian
Gilcher" export GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL="
[email protected]
" export GITHUB_NICK="skade" export GITHUB_ORGANIZATIONS="asquera,padrino" export TWITTER_NICK="@argorak" export TM_COMPANY="Asquera GmbH"
@argorak
$ whoami Ruby Programmer since 2003 Now a consultant specialising
in backends... ... and team building. I run usergroups and organize conferences as a hobby.
http://asquera.de
http://padrinorb.com
http://eurucamp.org
“I don’t want to be woken up at night, so
I call myself a developer.”
I set out to present a more dev-minded perspective on
devops.
That was harder then I thought...
There’s a talk about the “transforming devs to devops” later
on.
git push developer mindsets/devops
Whats the benefit, if you don’t do a lot of
ops?
Vagrant Puppet Chef
Vagrant Puppet Chef
How did a devops mindset improve the software I write?
A bit of history about myself
I started my career in a typical agency job.
LAMP and the DEV/OPS split.
It wasn’t even that bad...
...until projects got special.
scale scope
Suddenly it turned out that one of the most efficient
teams was an admin, a programmer and a cup of coffee.
Example
An example One of our clients imports and reencodes videos
from a constantly changing number of sources each day.
Sources FTP upload FTP fetch RSS feeds RSS feeds that
are no RSS feeds And some more...
Destinations All of them need to be reencoded to a
standard set of sizes and bitrates.
Simple approach
Single program with architecture
Same architecture, 3 processes
Why?
Videos per day
Critical failures last year
Deployments last year
New ways of discussing things.
None
None
Practical things learned in the process.
... beyond writing daemons and stuff.
A different perspective on code.
Infrastructure as code.
Code for infrastructure.
Common CLI tools Common configurations styles Common way of doing
things
Gives insight Well managable Well automatable
In general, I care less about internal quality of programs
nowadays then about external quality.
My ugliest piece of code ran 1,5 years in production
without a change.
Nobody ever noticed how horrible it was.
I evaluate new software differently.
“Ease of setup” is a red flag.
This especially applies to new and fancy databases.
Not having to push any buttons to start working a
database is problematic, if not dangerous.
You might miss things along the way.
“Ease of non-trivial configuration” is far more important.
How to grade that?
Set up a production-like system.
Keep tally marks on how often it leaves you puzzled.
There is no such thing as “setting up production too
early.”
Everything before that is childs play.
The big bangs always happen in production.
My favourite: Expensive loadbalancers that die during configuration and need
to be shipped to the manufacturer.
Teams need to get used to their own systems.
Metrics and Logging are important in complex systems.
Most pure development teams underrate them and implement them too
late.
They should be there from day one.
Last but not least: internal tooling can save you a
lot of work.
Creative ways to talk about it even more.
None
But what about the humans?
Giving people say in many things makes them discuss many
things.
There are two things I rarely see in teams with
strict roles.
1. Platform refactorings
Why? It always means that individual roles loose ground.
Why? This can get political very quick.
Why? Lack of skill.
2. Code reviews
Why? Not enough staff that “is qualified” to review certain
code.
The devops mindset takes away a lot of friction.
Less asking permission, more doing.
When your frontend developer changes your backend API, your varnish
config, your deployment scripts and the puppet manifests before handing stuff off to review to implement a new feature, you are there.
Bonus points if said developer is the companies apprentice.
The devops mindset can be incredibly empowering.
Devops-minded teams can cope with missing team members easier.
Everyone knows what everything is roughly doing anyways.
Find hacks to gather and spread that knowledge across your
team!
None
To sum up:
Teams with a strong devops culture: can handle more complexity
Teams with a strong devops culture: can handle more complexity
can find more alternative approaches to problems.
Teams with a strong devops culture: can handle more complexity
can find more alternative approaches to problems. are more likely to find solutions that handle well in production.
Their immediate answers are more complex.
Thank you for listening.
How did devops change your development style?
More Decks by Florian Gilcher
See All by Florian Gilcher
A new contract with users
skade
1
560
Using Rust to interface with my dive computer
skade
0
330
async/.await with async-std
skade
1
840
Training Rust
skade
1
160
Internet of Streams - IoT in Rust
skade
0
140
How DevRel is failing communities
skade
0
150
The power of the where clause
skade
0
750
Three Years of Rust
skade
1
260
Rust as a CLI language
skade
1
260
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
はじめてのPLATEAU
nokonoko1203
1
640
クラウドエージェントは、 何がそんなに便利なのか / what makes cloud agents so useful
rkaga
5
850
Event is what happens
moro
2
4.5k
SFCで実現する病院・医療システムの動的組み立て式UI
koukimiura
1
180
作れるエンジニアから、価値を届けるエンジニアへ
ryunakayama
1
280
ローカルLLMの基本と近況 2611 / Local LLM basics and recent situation 2611
kishida
0
160
Seven New Principles of Software Engineering
yegor256
0
480
baseline으로 마이그레이션, 리팩토링 안전하게 맡기기
fornewid
1
980
そのデザイントークン、Flutterでも同じ見た目になりますか?
nakamizu
0
340
Railsのためのパスキー実践入門 〜マルチテナントSaaSでの意思決定〜
utakaha
4
4.1k
Snowflake Openflow Connector利用の勘所 / 20261024developersio2026tokyo-snowflake-openflow
kasacchiful
PRO
0
330
조합이폭발하는디자인시스템이걸눈으로도테스트하라고요
giljongyu
0
750
Featured
See All Featured
Everyday Curiosity
cassininazir
0
400
Unlocking the hidden potential of vector embeddings in international SEO
frankvandijk
0
1k
Discover your Explorer Soul
emna__ayadi
2
1.3k
Design and Strategy: How to Deal with People Who Don’t "Get" Design
morganepeng
133
20k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
225
10k
Writing Fast Ruby
sferik
630
63k
Typedesign – Prime Four
hannesfritz
42
3.2k
Test your architecture with Archunit
thirion
2
2.5k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
254
26k
sira's awesome portfolio website redesign presentation
elsirapls
0
500
Mozcon NYC 2025: Stop Losing SEO Traffic
samtorres
1
600
Lightning talk: Run Django tests with GitHub Actions
sabderemane
0
320