the Open Data Institute • Now Data and Systems Architect at Arup • Arup and the digital built environment • Exploring data silos across the built environment, at four levels of granularity • This talk as a test of some evolving ideas - feedback please, new ideas, new connections - (and a beer for whoever spots the deliberate error in my slides)
often poorly maintained • Source of high value data • Low volume, low velocity and very analogue! • Want to live the home automation dream? Install our app! • No! • What is the appropriate architecture for domestic data? Smoke alarms
change the light bulbs? • 00s, 000s of devices, highly complex • Data and systems typically silo’d and proprietary • BIM: Building Information Management • Buildings as databases, but not just bigger silos • How does data flow around a building? How is it interconnected? Is every device an endpoint? • What is the appropriate data architecture? Buildings Photo credit: Brad Greenlee, flickr:bgreenlee
Where is the data? • Relevance to me is not evenly distributed across a town/city • Is data appropriately contextualised data consumers? • Disconnect between hyperlocal vs administrative viewpoints - bounding criteria: does your lens as a resident match that of your local authority? Neighbourhoods Photo credit: Axel Naud, flickr:axelnaud
• Should the same be true of data publishing? • Are (most) (open) data portals just creating new (duplicate) silos? • How does data flow around a town/city? • How is it interconnected? How should it accessed? • What is the appropriate data architecture? • Are all actors properly represented? Towns and cities Photo credit: Brian Marble, flickr:lostmahbles
buildings to cities? - Many common features and requirements • Multiple writers, multiple readers - design for appropriation and unintended reuse • Multiple data owners - favour openness to reduce friction • Many-to-many connections between data points - design for data connectivity • (Grab me later for the technical bit) From buildings to cities