of distractor selection among proficiency levels in reading tests: A focus on summarization processes in Japanese EFL learners. SAGE Open, 10, 1-14. doi: 10.1177/2158244020902087 削除問題 • 必要な情報の不足 低ー中: Cond.LOR = 4.709, 95%CI = [2.396, 9.255] 中ー高: Cond.LOR = 4.318, 95%CI = [2.241, 8.321] • 不必要な情報の混入 低ー中: Cond.LOR = 3.526, 95%CI = [1.750, 7.104] 中ー高: Cond.LOR = 2.707, 95%CI = [1.493, 4.908] 一般化問題 • 具体的な事例の抜き書き 低ー中: Cond.LOR = 1.910, 95%CI = [1.102, 3.608] 中ー高: Cond.LOR = 6.077, 95%CI = [3.223, 11.458] • 不必要な情報の混入 低ー中: Cond.LOR = 2.149, 95%CI = [1.125, 4.107] 中ー高: Cond.LOR = 5.755, 95%CI = [2.958, 11.195] 統合問題 • 部分的な記述 低ー中: Cond.LOR = 3.433, 95%CI = [1.783, 6.610] 中ー高: Cond.LOR = 1.990, 95%CI = [1.135, 3.488] • 筆者の主張との相違 低ー中: Cond.LOR = 4.038, 95%CI = [2.067, 7.892] 中ー高: Cond.LOR = 2.346, 95%CI = [1.251, 4.398] (博論・研究7)