Social metrics for research: Quantity and Quality

Social metrics for research: Quantity and Quality

This presentation was delivered to the 2012 Altmetrics conference and discussed using social metrics such as Mendeley Readership to accelerate scientific progress.

1234f1a875369df95753efe40ee9471c?s=128

William Gunn

June 21, 2012
Tweet

Transcript

  1. 1.

    Social metrics for research: Quantity and Quality William Gunn Head

    of Academic Outreach william.gunn@mendeley.com @mrgunn
  2. 2.

    “The state of knowledge of the human race is sitting

    in the scientists’ computers, and is currently not shared […] We need to get it unlocked so we can tackle those huge problems.” A Big Problem
  3. 4.

    Research is poor quality - Amgen: 47 of 53 “landmark”

    oncology publications could not be reproduced. - Bayer: 43 of 67 oncology & cardiovascular projects were based on contradictory results - Dr. John Ioannidis: 432 publications purporting sex differences in hypertension, multiple sclerosis, or lung cancer. Only one data set was reproducible.
  4. 9.

    http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291 Problems with Impact Factor “During discussions with Thomson Scientific

    over which article types the company deems as “citable,” it became clear that the process of determining a journal's impact factor is unscientific and arbitrary.”
  5. 10.

    Highly Tweeted articles are 11x more likely to be highly

    cited. (Eysenbach 2011) http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e123/ The higher the impact factor, the more likely the research is to be retracted, partly due to intense competition. http://bjoern.brembs.net/news766.html.11 What matters is who is reading your work!
  6. 11.

    Why are altmetrics important? Get better data on what's working

    Get it faster Provide qualitative descriptions, not just quantitative measures
  7. 12.

    ...and aggregates research data in the cloud Mendeley makes science

    more collaborative and transparent: Mendeley extracts research data… Collecting rich signals from domain experts.
  8. 13.

    200 million documents uploaded 2.0 million users Cambridge Stanford University

    MIT Imperial College London University of Oxford Harvard University University of Michigan University College London University of California at Berkeley Columbia University
  9. 16.
  10. 17.
  11. 18.
  12. 19.
  13. 20.
  14. 21.
  15. 23.
  16. 24.