Objective
One obstacle to the adoption of quantum computing is the time, energy, and money required for verification. Previous research suggests that room
temperature characteristics can be indicative of the quantum properties of JJFETs (right) at low temperatures. In this project, we aim to help
construct a generalized mathematical model through simulation and measurement that would eliminate the need for low-temperature
characterization.
References
● Mayer, W., Yuan, J., Wickramsinghe, K.S., Nguyen, T., Dartiailh, M.C., Shabani, J. (2019). Superconducting proximity effect in epitaxial
Al-InAs heterostructures. Applied Physics Letters, 114(10), 103-104, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5067363.
● Yuan, J. (2021). Epitaxial superconductor-semiconductor two-dimensional systems: a new platform for quantum computation, New York
University.
● Almanakly, A., Lendino, M., Kohli, A. (2020). Development of InAs transistors for scalable quantum computing, The Cooper Union.
Benchmarking Josephson Junctions at Room Temperature for
Scalable Qubit Testing
Tamar Bacalu, Alexa Jakob, Mark Koszykowski
Simulation
Measurement & Results
Background
● Qubits (quantum bits) can be constructed by using
superconducting devices like JJFETs, which are
Josephson Junctions with a semiconductor in its
insulating region
● Key properties of JJFETs include normal resistance
(R
N
) and critical current (I
C
). We focus on resistance
since superconducting properties don’t occur at room
temperature
Electron density and energy levels across
stack, including quantum well (1D simulation)
IV Characteristics (2D simulation)
● We measured IV curves of an existing JJFET and calculated resistance at
room temperature
● Nextnano is a software program that allows for simulation of nanoscale
devices using quantum and classical methods. We perform 1D and 2D
simulations of the JJFETs.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Professor Neveen Shlayan and the Shabani Lab at New York
University for being generous with their time and space, particularly Javad Shabani, Billy
Strickland, Mehdi Hatefipour, Zhujun Huang, Mohammad Farzaneh, and Joe Yuan.
Clockwise, from top left:
Measurement setup to
sweep both source and
gate; instrumentation
resistance as measured;
JS127A cryogenic
resistance as a function
of current bias and gate
voltage; JS129A upper
bound device resistance
as a function of gate
voltage and source-drain
voltage
Conclusion
● Difficult to draw conclusions: lack of data and devices, different
measurement setups, yet some evidence to support cryogenic-high
temperature relationship
● Provided documented framework for future students interested in project