Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Eoin McCarney

agi
May 29, 2014

Eoin McCarney

Print and Electronic Patron Driven Acquisition: A UCD Case Study

agi

May 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by agi

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. Print and Electronic Patron Driven Acquisition: A UCD Case Study

    Eoin McCarney UCD Library Acquisitions Group of Ireland Seminar, May 23rd, TCD
  2. What I will cover • What is PDA? • How

    PDA worked in UCD • Which subjects spent the most money? • Print PDA versus electronic PDA • The pros and the cons of PDA • PDA Workflow • Relevance Ranking & PDA
  3. How did it work? • National Tender & Framework agreement

    – 18th October 2012 • Proceeded with Ingram Coutts as supplier – 2nd April 2013 • Subject profiling – April 2013 • Live with E-PDA – 3rd May 2013 • Live with Print-PDA – 27th June 2013 • Project ended – 18th October 2013
  4. What next? Users search the catalogue and click on the

    item E-PDA item in the catalogue – 1st click
  5. e-Books They see this screen Passing here is one view

    which last 24 hours Passing here a second time triggers a seamless purchase 3 concurrent users Perpetual access E-PDA item in the catalogue – 2nd click
  6. PDA in UCD - Stats • Records Uploaded: 35,167 (P)

    19,337 (E) • Total Spend: €216,000 • Total Orders: 2,172 • E–PDA Orders placed – 1,128 • Print PDA Orders placed – 1,044 • Average price of e-PDA book: €149.84 • Average price of print-PDA book: €45.51
  7. Business 14% Politics 9% Philosophy 7% English, Drama & Film

    7% Medicine 7% Psychology 6% History & Archives 5% Law 5% Education 5% GPEP 4% Business Politics Philosophy English, Drama & Film Medicine & Medical Science Psychology History & Archives Law Education GPEP E-PDA Orders by School (Top Ten Only)
  8. Print-PDA Orders by School (Top Ten Only) English, Drama &

    Film 10% Politics 7% History & Archives 7% Business 6% Medicine 6% Law 6% Sociology 6% Art History 5% Architecture 5% Psychology 4% English, Drama & Film Politics History & Archives Business Medicine & Medical Science Law Sociology Art History & Cultural Policy Architecture Psychology
  9. Comparative Usage of PDA and Non-PDA E-Book Titles 0 1000

    2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 Total E-PDA Usage during Pilot Period Average E-PDA Usage per Title during Pilot Period Total Non PDA E-Book Usage during Pilot Period Average Use per Non- PDA E-Book Title during Pilot Period 9507 8.43 1413 3.27
  10. Comparative Usage of PDA and Non-PDA Print Book Titles 1.32

    1.04 0.63 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 Print PDA Reading Lists Firm Orders
  11. Challenges of PDA in UCD • Communication and marketing •

    Volume & timing • Disruption to departmental workflow • Over 300 print orders not collected • ‘Flooding’ of the Catalogue • Poor quality of print MARC records • Overlap: Multiple editions of the same text
  12. Workflow • Disruptive technology • Acquisitions involvement after purchase •

    Vendor supplied order files • Amending MARC records • Automation with LMS
  13. PDA & Relevance Ranking • E and recently published material

    • PDA material ranked higher • Skewed view of collection • Difficult to resolve systematically
  14. What worked well? • Subject profiling – Little, if any,

    inferior material ordered • The money got spent quickly • Hugely popular with students and staff • Broad subject appeal • Technology very robust
  15. Next steps • We have continued with PDA (E &

    Print) • Made slight amendments to subject profiles • Re-launched PDA in March 2014 • Reduced allocation - €100,000 • Review again at end of project