Different LC classifications assigned to suppliers ◦ Title overlap needed to be removed Complicated by supplier use of own e-isbns Impact on cataloguing needed to be considered Selection criteria effective – carried though into 2013 exercise
(2010 Medicine) Pricing ◦ Maximum £100 (£200 Medicine) LC ranges (assigned to 3 faculties) ◦ Adjustment needed for balanced nos of titles Various series excluded ◦ e.g. Dummies, Law Express
Single user (if access model not available) Limited upgrading of purchases to multi user Separate purchases needed for upgrades Purchase trigger ◦ Purchase on second full view
profile’ feature used to upload records Coutts records edited in upload ◦ Various Marc fields dropped or edited ◦ Marc 856 entries revised, no RDA fields used in 2013 Records tagged with faculty code ◦ Initially tagged as ‘unpurchased’
exercise included as viewed Pricing issues ◦ Pricing as at time of invoicing (not profile creation) ◦ Need to check for incorrect pricing Closure of exercise ◦ No automatic closure – Coutts felt to be cautious; closing with unspent balance Coutts unable to separate usage data for the two PDA exercises
were relevant to research at Queen’s ◦ Limited availability of reading list material as expected Usage compares well with eBooks selected by subject librarians ◦ High usage where undergraduate texts included
◦ Analytics age profiling suggests postgraduates and staff are the main catalogue users ◦ Approximately 25% in the 18-24 age group Devices being used ◦ Tablet catalogue use still low – under 4%? User preference still for print? ◦ 70% preference for print for Queen’s undergraduates given a straight choice