Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

John Knowles

agi
May 29, 2014

John Knowles

PDA The Queen's University Experience

agi

May 29, 2014
Tweet

More Decks by agi

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. Two PDA exercises  September – November 2012 ◦ 10,367

    titles loaded ◦ 602 purchased ◦ Suppliers: Coutts, Dawsons  September – December 2013 ◦ 6,384 titles loaded ◦ Assigned to 3 faculty funds ◦ 555 purchased ◦ Supplier: Coutts
  2. Review of 2012 exercise  Using two suppliers problematic ◦

    Different LC classifications assigned to suppliers ◦ Title overlap needed to be removed  Complicated by supplier use of own e-isbns  Impact on cataloguing needed to be considered  Selection criteria effective – carried though into 2013 exercise
  3. Selection criteria (2013)  Year of publication ◦ 2012 onwards

    (2010 Medicine)  Pricing ◦ Maximum £100 (£200 Medicine)  LC ranges (assigned to 3 faculties) ◦ Adjustment needed for balanced nos of titles  Various series excluded ◦ e.g. Dummies, Law Express
  4. Purchase options  Models Used ◦ Access model (credits) ◦

    Single user (if access model not available)  Limited upgrading of purchases to multi user  Separate purchases needed for upgrades  Purchase trigger ◦ Purchase on second full view
  5. Marc record load  Queen’s using Innovative Millennium ◦ ‘load

    profile’ feature used to upload records  Coutts records edited in upload ◦ Various Marc fields dropped or edited ◦ Marc 856 entries revised, no RDA fields used in 2013  Records tagged with faculty code ◦ Initially tagged as ‘unpurchased’
  6. Record edits on purchase  Need to change tag to

    ‘purchased’ ◦ Delays in weekly batch lists  Some further cataloguing changes ◦ Need to integrate with workflow
  7. Other issues noted  Titles with one view from previous

    exercise included as viewed  Pricing issues ◦ Pricing as at time of invoicing (not profile creation) ◦ Need to check for incorrect pricing  Closure of exercise ◦ No automatic closure – Coutts felt to be cautious; closing with unspent balance  Coutts unable to separate usage data for the two PDA exercises
  8. Length of PDA exercises  2012 PDA ◦ 10,367 titles

    loaded ◦ 602 purchased over 4 weeks  2013 PDA ◦ 6,384 titles loaded ◦ 555 purchased over 11 weeks
  9. Relevance of titles selected  Subject teams felt titles selected

    were relevant to research at Queen’s ◦ Limited availability of reading list material as expected  Usage compares well with eBooks selected by subject librarians ◦ High usage where undergraduate texts included
  10. Going forward  Expectations that PDA exercises will continue ◦

    Likely to be annual?  Initial exercises used supplementary funding  Future exercises likely to be supported from the existing book funds
  11. Some other considerations  Who’s using the catalogue (and selecting)?

    ◦ Analytics age profiling suggests postgraduates and staff are the main catalogue users ◦ Approximately 25% in the 18-24 age group  Devices being used ◦ Tablet catalogue use still low – under 4%?  User preference still for print? ◦ 70% preference for print for Queen’s undergraduates given a straight choice