Standard Dr. Athulan Vijayaraghavan System Insights Supported by: NCDMM, General Dynamics – OTS, AMT Author Contact: [email protected] Friday, February 17, 12
Standard methodology and metric to evaluate energy consumptions of machine tools Applications: Understand energy impact of a machine tool Compare energy usage of two machine tools Estimate relative ROI of two machine tools Assess environmental impact and embedded energy of machined parts Apply in capacity planning A pragmatic approach: Perform tests in reasonable amount of time, in standard industrial setting No special fixtures, tools, workpieces Friday, February 17, 12
definition: 3 parts – Tare, Component, Cutting Scale test duration to 60 minutes, total Rationale: 50% time removing material; 25% idle; 25% exercising components Test conditions Fixed Spindle RPM: Spindle construction and design is major determinant of energy usage Fixed material properties (material scaling analysis can be applied to generalized) Apply cutting tests across range of volumetric material removal rates (MRR) Test Definition Normalized Duration Scaling Tare Usage Component Usage Cutting Tests Run machine under idle condition 15 minutes Linearly scale component tests to normalized duration Exercise major components: Axes, spindle, accessories 15 minutes Linearly scale component tests to normalized duration Material removal at fixed volumetric rates 30 minutes Using Material Removal Rate Standardized BEC Metric Total Energy Usage 60 minutes Friday, February 17, 12
relationship between Energy per Volume & MRR Related to process mechanics and not process parameters Consistent relationship was seen across our tests With curve fitting and basic calculus, Average Cutting Power across a range of MRR values can be estimated using a limited set of experimental data Lower MRR Higher Specific Energy y"="1286.9x+0.85" y"="2092.4x+0.856" y"="1674.1x+0.864" 0" 10" 20" 30" 40" 50" 60" 70" 80" 90" 0.000" 100.000" 200.000" 300.000" 400.000" 500.000" 600.000" Specific'Energy'(J/mm^3)' MRR'(mm^3/sec)' "TC200"" "JobberXL"" QT100" Device A Device C Device B Source: Dahmus & Gutowski, 2004 Friday, February 17, 12
Devices Specification Device A Device B Device C X Axis Travel 375 mm 350 mm 300 mm Z Axis Travel 375 mm 350 mm 400 mm Max Spindle RPM 6000 6000 3560 Machine Rated Maximum Apparent Power [kVA] 15.6 24.7 16 Rated Current Load [A] 27 31 29 Device Type 2-Axis Lathe Spindle Speed 2500 RPM Material Mild Steel Devices Specs BEC test applied to 3 devices in standard Industrial environment Each test took approximately 1 hour to run Test results computed using Web-app developed by System Insights Friday, February 17, 12
Usage BEC metric can be applied in estimating the annual energy usage In the example, Device A saves more than $800 in energy costs over a year Device A Device B Device C Estimated Annual Energy Usage (kWh) 8195.00 10854.00 14574.00 Estimated Annual Carbon Footprint (MT CO2 eq) 6.56 8.68 11.66 Estimated Annual Energy Cost ($) 1065.00 1411.00 1894.00 Device A Device B Device C 0 500 1000 1500 2000 $1,894 $1,411 $1,065 Annual Energy Usage Friday, February 17, 12
of its kind for machine tools No need for a special test part Entire test runs in under 1 hour Can quickly apply in ROI and costing analysis Can be easily scaled for other machining processes Next Steps: Work with AMT in disseminating the standard Expand to other machining processes Expand to other processes technologies: forging, casting, composite fabrication Friday, February 17, 12
and Services Monitor à Detect à Predict Realtime Analysis of Integrated Manufacturing Systems Cloud Based Distributed Data Analysis Next Generation Manufacturing Technology vimana: Manufacturing Productivity Analysis viper: Manufacturing Energy Analysis MTConnect tools Friday, February 17, 12
Street, Suite 204B Berkeley, CA 94710 India 235/1A & 2C, Vengaivasal Main Road Madambakkam Post, Selaiyur Chennai 600073 contact: [email protected] Our Offices Friday, February 17, 12