Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Boxed: bringing algebraic types to TypeScript
Search
Matthias Le Brun
March 27, 2024
Technology
190
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Boxed: bringing algebraic types to TypeScript
Matthias Le Brun
March 27, 2024
More Decks by Matthias Le Brun
See All by Matthias Le Brun
GraphQL, Pothos & SQLite: a perfect match
bloodyowl
0
110
(why the hell did I) build a GraphQL client for the browser
bloodyowl
0
150
leveraging (algebraic data) types to make your UI rock @ jsheroes
bloodyowl
0
330
Leveraging (algebraic data) types to make your UI rock solid
bloodyowl
0
500
La drôle d'histoire de JavaScript
bloodyowl
0
400
Healthy Code Collaboration
bloodyowl
0
360
Simplify your UI management with (algebraic data) types
bloodyowl
0
850
Simplify your UI management with (algebraic data) types
bloodyowl
1
580
Migrating a large Reason+React codebase to hooks
bloodyowl
0
610
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
“詰む”前に仕組みを作れ 〜技術の波に溺れないためのキャッチアップ術〜
takasyou
7
3.5k
入門!AWS Blocks
ysuzuki
1
180
Kiro Ambassador を目指す話
k_adachi_01
0
120
「軸足」は 固定しなくていい - 熱量と強みで描く、しなやかなキャリアの形
kakehashi
PRO
1
240
徹底討論!ECS vs EKS!
daitak
3
1.4k
OTel × Datadog で 「AI活用」を計測し、改善に繋げる
shihochan
2
590
スタートアップにAmazon EKSは早すぎる? マルチプロダクト戦略を加速する Platform Engineeringの実践 / Is Amazon EKS Too Soon for Startups? Practical Platform Engineering to Accelerate a Multi-Product Strategy
elmodev09
1
1.7k
AI-DLCを “そのまま導入しなかった”話 ~組織に合わせてアジャストした 私たちの実践共有~
hiroramos4
PRO
1
400
ぼっちではじめた登壇が「51名」「241件」の発信に化けた
subroh0508
1
300
AIチャットの改善から見えた、良いAI体験とは / What Constitutes a Good AI Experience: Insights from Improving AI Chat
kubode
0
120
10年間のブログ発信を振り返って見えたWebアプリケーションエンジニアとしての軌跡
stefafafan
0
180
【2026年版】 ベクトル検索とEmbedding最前線
mocobeta
23
7.3k
Featured
See All Featured
The Impact of AI in SEO - AI Overviews June 2024 Edition
aleyda
5
1.1k
Exploring anti-patterns in Rails
aemeredith
3
420
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
destraynor
231
55k
The Organizational Zoo: Understanding Human Behavior Agility Through Metaphoric Constructive Conversations (based on the works of Arthur Shelley, Ph.D)
kimpetersen
PRO
0
360
Paper Plane (Part 1)
katiecoart
PRO
0
9.2k
Why Mistakes Are the Best Teachers: Turning Failure into a Pathway for Growth
auna
0
160
Dominate Local Search Results - an insider guide to GBP, reviews, and Local SEO
greggifford
PRO
0
200
Java REST API Framework Comparison - PWX 2021
mraible
34
9.4k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
225
10k
Marketing to machines
jonoalderson
1
5.5k
Context Engineering - Making Every Token Count
addyosmani
9
980
AI Search: Implications for SEO and How to Move Forward - #ShenzhenSEOConference
aleyda
1
1.3k
Transcript
Boxed
Matthias Le Brun @bloodyowl lead engineering manager chief shitpost office
the easiest way to provide banking features (accounts, payments, cards…) we're hiring! @
None
None
None
None
PREVIOUSLY ON Matthias tries to convert people to FP
Algebraic Data Types yay
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; };
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; error data ERROR NULL NULL DATA NULL NULL ERROR DATA
{ data: null; error: null; };
type Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>;
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; state ERROR DATA
API response API response
API response API response
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; 2 2 1 1 4 2 x = + =
Algebra it's just basic math™
+ x
quiz 157 x 8341 = ?
quiz 999 + 1 = ?
union types
monads functors
functor
monad
[1, 2, 3].map(x => x * 2) // [2, 4,
6] [1, 2, 3].flatMap(x => [x, x * 2]) // [1, 2, 2, 4, 3, 6]
map: <A, B>(T<A>, (a: A) => B) => T<B>: flatMap:
<A, B>(T<A>, (a: A) => T<B>) => T<B>;
None
null & undefined are bad
errors aren't always exceptions
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
THAT WAS Matthias tries to convert people to FP NOW
LET'S TALK ABOUT BOXED
✨ new job ✨ 2022
«we use TypeScript»
None
let's look at the ecosystem™
fp-ts
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), ) no autocomplete
on current value
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), x => {}
) need to inspect argument for type
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), x => {}
) need to inspect argument for type not a good DX
export declare const chainFirstTaskK: <A, B>(f: (a: A) = >
T.Task<B>) = > <E>(first: TaskEither<E, A>) = > TaskEither<E, A> ah just what I was looking for
we've looked at the ecosystem™
«let's try to make these types work with a good
DX in a structurally typed language» — me, allegedly drunk
structural typing
class Some<A> {} class None {} const value: Some<string> =
new None();
what we need → good DX → interop with ts-pattern
→ fast
what we needed → chaining API → autocomplete → less
imports
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
1st iteration: naive discriminator in TS (aka poor man's nominal
types)
1st iteration: naive and we're storing the state in the
class instance
None
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
3rd iteration: make it fast
initial release
initial release
type Option<A> = Some<A> | None;
type Result<A, E> = Ok<A> | Error<E>;
type AsyncData<A> = | NotAsked | Loading | Done<A>;
Future<A>; better promises™ cancellable monadic leaves error state to Result
const parsed = input != null ? parseInput(input) : undefined;
const transformed = parsed != null ? transform(parsed) : undefined; const printed = transformed != null ? print(transformed) : undefined; const value = printed != null ? prettify(printed) : "fallback"; input .map(parseInput) .flatMap(transform) .map(print) .map(prettify) .getWithDefault("fallback");
user-testing
None
insights people need human-written docs → we doubled down on
examples & added search
insights don't try to replicate another language → give good
defaults for TS
Result< Data, ServerError > Result< A, ServerError | FinalizeError >
insights people are familiar with just a few data types
→ reduce confusion
insights people can be docs-first or type-first → experience needs
to be good for both
insights readability matters → chaining API was the way to
go
insights mapping on existing JS knowledge helps → if it
exists, name it the same way
insights pipe() syntax had impact on the runtime → expressiveness
is important
4th iteration implement the feedback rename some methods update some
defaults
5th iteration: what the actual fu
5th iteration: what the actual fu
recently fix the errors
recently improved perf by 2x to 10x
recently improved perf by 2x to 10x blazing fast certi
fi ed™ ⚡
Boxed → github.com/swan-io/boxed → swan-io.github.io/boxed
None
$ yarn add @swan-io/boxed
Matthias Le Brun @bloodyowl we're still hiring thank you! 🙏