Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Boxed: bringing algebraic types to TypeScript
Search
Matthias Le Brun
March 27, 2024
Technology
0
130
Boxed: bringing algebraic types to TypeScript
Matthias Le Brun
March 27, 2024
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Matthias Le Brun
See All by Matthias Le Brun
(why the hell did I) build a GraphQL client for the browser
bloodyowl
0
110
leveraging (algebraic data) types to make your UI rock @ jsheroes
bloodyowl
0
290
Leveraging (algebraic data) types to make your UI rock solid
bloodyowl
0
430
La drôle d'histoire de JavaScript
bloodyowl
0
370
Healthy Code Collaboration
bloodyowl
0
300
Simplify your UI management with (algebraic data) types
bloodyowl
0
820
Simplify your UI management with (algebraic data) types
bloodyowl
1
540
Migrating a large Reason+React codebase to hooks
bloodyowl
0
560
Third Party Hell (BestOfWeb)
bloodyowl
0
690
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
DSPy入門
tomehirata
6
880
AIでデータ活用を加速させる取り組み / Leveraging AI to accelerate data utilization
okiyuki99
6
1.7k
[re:Inent2025事前勉強会(有志で開催)] re:Inventで見つけた人生をちょっと変えるコツ
sh_fk2
1
1.2k
Observability — Extending Into Incident Response
nari_ex
2
750
現場の壁を乗り越えて、 「計装注入」が拓く オブザーバビリティ / Beyond the Field Barriers: Instrumentation Injection and the Future of Observability
aoto
PRO
1
900
次世代のメールプロトコルの斜め読み
hirachan
3
330
ざっくり学ぶ 『エンジニアリングリーダー 技術組織を育てるリーダーシップと セルフマネジメント』 / 50 minute Engineering Leader
iwashi86
9
4.3k
Databricks Free Editionで始めるMLflow
taka_aki
0
770
触れるけど壊れないWordPressの作り方
masakawai
0
650
マルチエージェントのチームビルディング_2025-10-25
shinoyamada
0
250
20251102 WordCamp Kansai 2025
chiilog
1
520
OTEPsで知るOpenTelemetryの未来 / Observability Conference Tokyo 2025
arthur1
0
430
Featured
See All Featured
RailsConf 2023
tenderlove
30
1.3k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
54
7.9k
The Art of Programming - Codeland 2020
erikaheidi
56
14k
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
285
14k
The Cost Of JavaScript in 2023
addyosmani
55
9.1k
Practical Tips for Bootstrapping Information Extraction Pipelines
honnibal
PRO
23
1.5k
How STYLIGHT went responsive
nonsquared
100
5.9k
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
72
19k
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
697
190k
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
73
11k
Keith and Marios Guide to Fast Websites
keithpitt
412
23k
Thoughts on Productivity
jonyablonski
72
4.9k
Transcript
Boxed
Matthias Le Brun @bloodyowl lead engineering manager chief shitpost office
the easiest way to provide banking features (accounts, payments, cards…) we're hiring! @
None
None
None
None
PREVIOUSLY ON Matthias tries to convert people to FP
Algebraic Data Types yay
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; };
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; error data ERROR NULL NULL DATA NULL NULL ERROR DATA
{ data: null; error: null; };
type Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>;
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; state ERROR DATA
API response API response
API response API response
type State = { data?: Data; error?: Error; }; type
Result<Data> = | Ok<Data> | Error<Error>; 2 2 1 1 4 2 x = + =
Algebra it's just basic math™
+ x
quiz 157 x 8341 = ?
quiz 999 + 1 = ?
union types
monads functors
functor
monad
[1, 2, 3].map(x => x * 2) // [2, 4,
6] [1, 2, 3].flatMap(x => [x, x * 2]) // [1, 2, 2, 4, 3, 6]
map: <A, B>(T<A>, (a: A) => B) => T<B>: flatMap:
<A, B>(T<A>, (a: A) => T<B>) => T<B>;
None
null & undefined are bad
errors aren't always exceptions
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
promises were made the wrong way in JS
THAT WAS Matthias tries to convert people to FP NOW
LET'S TALK ABOUT BOXED
✨ new job ✨ 2022
«we use TypeScript»
None
let's look at the ecosystem™
fp-ts
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), ) no autocomplete
on current value
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), x => {}
) need to inspect argument for type
pipe( token, TaskEither.bindW("user", getTokenFromUser), TaskEither.bindW("project", getProject), TaskEither.chainW(getMembership), x => {}
) need to inspect argument for type not a good DX
export declare const chainFirstTaskK: <A, B>(f: (a: A) = >
T.Task<B>) = > <E>(first: TaskEither<E, A>) = > TaskEither<E, A> ah just what I was looking for
we've looked at the ecosystem™
«let's try to make these types work with a good
DX in a structurally typed language» — me, allegedly drunk
structural typing
class Some<A> {} class None {} const value: Some<string> =
new None();
what we need → good DX → interop with ts-pattern
→ fast
what we needed → chaining API → autocomplete → less
imports
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
1st iteration: naive discriminator in TS (aka poor man's nominal
types)
1st iteration: naive and we're storing the state in the
class instance
None
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
1st iteration: naive wanted the types to be opaque but
safe
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
2nd iteration: anger
3rd iteration: make it fast
initial release
initial release
type Option<A> = Some<A> | None;
type Result<A, E> = Ok<A> | Error<E>;
type AsyncData<A> = | NotAsked | Loading | Done<A>;
Future<A>; better promises™ cancellable monadic leaves error state to Result
const parsed = input != null ? parseInput(input) : undefined;
const transformed = parsed != null ? transform(parsed) : undefined; const printed = transformed != null ? print(transformed) : undefined; const value = printed != null ? prettify(printed) : "fallback"; input .map(parseInput) .flatMap(transform) .map(print) .map(prettify) .getWithDefault("fallback");
user-testing
None
insights people need human-written docs → we doubled down on
examples & added search
insights don't try to replicate another language → give good
defaults for TS
Result< Data, ServerError > Result< A, ServerError | FinalizeError >
insights people are familiar with just a few data types
→ reduce confusion
insights people can be docs-first or type-first → experience needs
to be good for both
insights readability matters → chaining API was the way to
go
insights mapping on existing JS knowledge helps → if it
exists, name it the same way
insights pipe() syntax had impact on the runtime → expressiveness
is important
4th iteration implement the feedback rename some methods update some
defaults
5th iteration: what the actual fu
5th iteration: what the actual fu
recently fix the errors
recently improved perf by 2x to 10x
recently improved perf by 2x to 10x blazing fast certi
fi ed™ ⚡
Boxed → github.com/swan-io/boxed → swan-io.github.io/boxed
None
$ yarn add @swan-io/boxed
Matthias Le Brun @bloodyowl we're still hiring thank you! 🙏