Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Monads you've already put in production (withou...
Search
Tejas Dinkar
October 10, 2014
Technology
1
1.2k
Monads you've already put in production (without knowing it)
Tejas Dinkar
October 10, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Tejas Dinkar
See All by Tejas Dinkar
Quick Wins for Page Speed
gja
0
150
Progressive Web Apps In Clojure(Script)
gja
4
2.5k
Lightning - Monads you already use (without knowing it)
gja
1
410
Native Extensions Served 3 Ways
gja
0
380
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
Agent Skils
dip_tech
PRO
0
130
Exadata Fleet Update
oracle4engineer
PRO
0
1.1k
コンテナセキュリティの最新事情 ~ 2026年版 ~
kyohmizu
6
1.4k
Greatest Disaster Hits in Web Performance
guaca
0
280
Ruby版 JSXのRuxが気になる
sansantech
PRO
0
170
20260204_Midosuji_Tech
takuyay0ne
1
160
AI駆動開発を事業のコアに置く
tasukuonizawa
1
360
Context Engineeringの取り組み
nutslove
0
380
1,000 にも届く AWS Organizations 組織のポリシー運用をちゃんとしたい、という話
kazzpapa3
0
150
Codex 5.3 と Opus 4.6 にコーポレートサイトを作らせてみた / Codex 5.3 vs Opus 4.6
ama_ch
0
200
[CV勉強会@関東 World Model 読み会] Orbis: Overcoming Challenges of Long-Horizon Prediction in Driving World Models (Mousakhan+, NeurIPS 2025)
abemii
0
150
CDKで始めるTypeScript開発のススメ
tsukuboshi
1
540
Featured
See All Featured
Lightning Talk: Beautiful Slides for Beginners
inesmontani
PRO
1
440
How People are Using Generative and Agentic AI to Supercharge Their Products, Projects, Services and Value Streams Today
helenjbeal
1
130
HDC tutorial
michielstock
1
390
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
348
40k
Exploring anti-patterns in Rails
aemeredith
2
250
Conquering PDFs: document understanding beyond plain text
inesmontani
PRO
4
2.3k
SERP Conf. Vienna - Web Accessibility: Optimizing for Inclusivity and SEO
sarafernandez
1
1.3k
Being A Developer After 40
akosma
91
590k
Chasing Engaging Ingredients in Design
codingconduct
0
110
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
addyosmani
515
110k
Navigating Algorithm Shifts & AI Overviews - #SMXNext
aleyda
0
1.1k
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
35
3.4k
Transcript
Monads you are already using in prod Tejas Dinkar nilenso
about.me • Hi, I’m Tejas • Nilenso: Partner • twitter:
tdinkar • github: gja
Serious Pony
Online Abuse
Trouble at the Koolaid Point http://seriouspony.com/trouble-at-the-koolaid-point/ https://storify.com/adriarichards/telling-my-troll-story-because- kathy-sierra-left-t
If you think you understand Monads, you don't understand Monads.
None
This talk is inaccurate and will make a mathematician cry
None
Goal of this talk For you to say “Oh yeah,
I’ve used that hack”
None
Monads • Programmable Semicolons • Used to hide plumbing away
from you • You can say Monads in almost any sentence and people will think you are smart
None
Values Value
Monads Value Box
Mysore Masala Monad M onad Value
Monads Value Box
Monads • Monads define two functions • return takes a
value and puts it in a box • bind takes a box & function f, returning f(value) • it is expected that the function returns a box
Value Value Another Value Value Function return bind
Our Function Signatures Value f(value)
Some math (√4) + 5
Some math (√4) + 5 3 or 7!
Value 4
Monad [4]
[alive, dead]
ruby! x = [1, 2, 3] y = x.map {
|x| x + 1 } # y = [2, 3, 4]
return Value Value return
return def m_return(x) [x] end # m_return(4) => [4]
The functions Value f(value)
Square Root fn def sqrt(x) s = Math.sqrt(x) [s, -s]
end # sqrt(4) => [2, -2]
Increment Fn def inc_5(x) [x + 5] end # inc_5(1)
=> [6]
Bind Functions Another Value Value Function bind
Bind Function x = m_return(4) y = x.????? { |p|
sqrt(p) } # I want [-2, 2]
Bind Function x = m_return(4) y = x.map {|p| sqrt(p)
} # y => [[2, -2]] # ^—— Box in a box?
Bind Function x = m_return(4) y = x.mapcat {|p| sqrt(p)
} # y => [2, -2]
Putting it together m_return(4) .mapcat {|p| sqrt(p)} .mapcat {|p| inc_5(p)}
# => [3, 7]
You have invented the List Monad, used to model non-determinism
Congrats
Turtles all the way down
A small constraint • Let’s do a bit of a
self imposed constraint on this • Functions must return either 0 or 1 elements • (we’ll only model positive integers here)
return - stays the same
bind - stays the same x = m_return(4) y =
x.mapcat { |p| inc_5(p) } # y => 9
Square Root Fn def sqrt(x) if (x < 0) return
[] #error else [Math.sqrt(x)] end end # sqrt(4) => [2] # sqrt(-1) => []
Describe in English There is a list passed to each
step Maybe this list has just one element, or Maybe it has none
None
The Maybe Monad • The intent is to short circuit
computation • The value of the `box’ is None, or Just(Value) • You can think of it as a type-safe nil / null
try def try(x, f) if x == nil return f(x)
else return nil end end # 4.try { |x| x + 5 } => 9 # nil.try {|x| x + 5 } => nil
None
Let’s start over • The Monad Laws • Left Identity
• Right Identity • Associativity
Left Identity m_return(a).bind(f) == f(a)
Right Identity m.bind(m_return) == m
Associativity m.bind(f).bind(g) == m.bind(x -> f(x).bind(g))
Store Computation
The State Monad • Rest of the world - State
Machine (sorta) • The value inside the box f(state) => [r new-state] • Particularly useful in pure languages like Haskell • Let’s build a stack
The functions Value f(value)
The functions (f(value) state) [new-value, new-state]
push def push(val) lambda { |state| new_state = state.push(val) [value,
new_state] } end
pop def pop() lambda { |state| val = state.pop() [val,
state] } end
def double_top() lambda { |state| top = state.pop() [2 *
top, state.push(2*top)] } end double_top
return def m_return(x) lambda { |state| [x, state] } end
bind def bind(mv, f) lambda { |state| v, temp_state =
mv(state) state_fn = f(v) state_fn(temp_state) } end
example # Not working code ! m_return(4) .bind(a -> push(a))
.bind(b -> push(b + 1)) .bind(c -> double_top()) .bind(d -> sum_top2()) .bind(e -> pop())
None
Associativity m.bind(f).bind(g) == m.bind(x => f(x).bind(g))
turn this # Not working code ! m_return(4) .bind(a ->
push(a)) .bind(b -> push(b + 1)) .bind(c -> double_top()) .bind(d -> sum_top2()) .bind(e -> pop())
into this m_return(4) .bind(a -> push(a) .bind(b -> push(b +
1) .bind(c -> double_top() .bind(d -> sum_top() .bind(e -> pop())))))
done with ruby
imagine # Not working code state_monad { a <- m_return(4)
b <- push(a) c <- push(b + 1) d <- double_top() e <- sum_top2() pop() }
Back to List m_return(4) .mapcat {|p| sqrt(p)} .mapcat {|p| inc_5(p)}
# => [3, 7]
Back to List m_return(4) .mapcat {|a| sqrt(a) .mapcat {|b| inc_5(b)}}
# => [3, 7]
Back to List list_monad { a <- m_return(4) b <-
sqrt(a) c <- inc_5(b) c }
On to Clojure • this is an example from clojure.net
• the state is a vector containing every function we’ve called so far
(defn inc-s [x] (fn [state] [(inc x) (conj state :inc)]))
in clojure (defn inc-s [x] (fn [state] [(inc x) (conj
state :inc)])) (defn do-things [x] (domonad state-m [a (inc-s x) b (double-s a) c (dec-s b) d (dec-s c)] d)) ! ((do-things 7) []) => [14 [:inc :double :dec :dec]]
state monad in Clojure (defmonad state-m "Monad describing stateful computations.
The monadic values have the structure (fn [old-state] [result new-state])." [m-result (fn m-result-state [v] (fn [s] [v s])) m-bind (fn m-bind-state [mv f] (fn [s] (let [[v ss] (mv s)] ((f v) ss)))) ])
state monad in Haskell inc = state (\st -> let
st' = st +1 in (st’,st')) inc3 = do x <- inc y <- inc z <- inc return z
Finally, IO
IOMonad • rand-int(100) is non deterministic !
ay-yo
IOMonad • rand-int(100) is non deterministic • rand-int(100, seed =
42) is deterministic • monadic value: f(world) => [value, world-after-io]
IOMonad • puts() just `appends to a buffer’ in the
real world • How does gets() return different strings? • gets() returns a fixed value based on the `world’
Image Credits http://www.myfoodarama.com/2010/11/masala- dosa.html http://www.clojure.net/2012/02/10/State/ http://www.cafepress.com/ +no_place_like_home_ruby_slippers_3x5_area_rug, 796646161 http://www.netizens-stalbans.co.uk/installs-and- upgrades.html.htm
http://www.hpcorporategroup.com/what-is-the-life- box.html
Thank You MANY QUESTIONS? VERY MONAD SO FUNCTIONAL Y NO
CLOJURE?
[email protected]
@tdinkar WOW WOW WOW MUCH EASY SUPER SIMPLE