Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Learning to Build Distributed Systems the Hard Way
Search
Theo Hultberg
March 05, 2013
Programming
150
1
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Learning to Build Distributed Systems the Hard Way
Scandinavian Developer Conference 2013
Theo Hultberg
March 05, 2013
More Decks by Theo Hultberg
See All by Theo Hultberg
Datalakes at AWS Summit Stockholm 2018
iconara
0
100
Building a CQL driver
iconara
0
85
Chasing the Elephant
iconara
0
100
Learning to Build Distributed Systems the Hard Way
iconara
2
230
Learning to Build Distributed Systems the Hard Way
iconara
3
5.2k
Concurrency and Distributed Systems in JRuby
iconara
3
700
A Guide to the Post Relational Revolution
iconara
4
5.4k
Standing on the Shoulders of Giants with JRuby
iconara
4
180
Shortcuts Around the Mistakes I've Made Scaling MongoDB
iconara
4
170
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
任せる範囲はこう広がった / How the Scope of AI Delegation Has Expanded
nrslib
0
150
LaravelLive Japan の裏方のすべて — 第188回 PHP勉強会@東京 (2026-06-24)
suguruooki
2
130
ADKを使って簡単にAIエージェントを作ってみよう
k1mu21
0
280
Vite+ Unified Toolchain for the Web
naokihaba
0
360
1B+ /day規模のログを管理する技術
broadleaf
0
120
ランチタイムLT会3周年!ランチタイムLT会を3年間続けられたお話
y0hgi
1
110
Agentic UI
manfredsteyer
PRO
0
200
Strategic Design in the Frontend: Moduliths & Micro Frontends @DDDEurope
manfredsteyer
PRO
0
130
その問い、本当に正しいですか?AI時代のエンジニアに必要な哲学と認知科学 / ai-philosophy-cognitive-science
minodriven
14
6.3k
正しくソフトウェアを作る、前提を疑うための認知の視点 / doubt-premise
minodriven
21
7.1k
Developing with AI Agents — Codex, Claude Code & Cowork Practical Guide
x5gtrn
PRO
0
1.3k
TAKTでAI駆動開発の品質を設計する
j5ik2o
7
1.5k
Featured
See All Featured
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
23k
JavaScript: Past, Present, and Future - NDC Porto 2020
reverentgeek
52
6k
Learning to Love Humans: Emotional Interface Design
aarron
275
41k
Fireside Chat
paigeccino
42
4k
The agentic SEO stack - context over prompts
schlessera
0
830
Building Flexible Design Systems
yeseniaperezcruz
330
40k
Building Better People: How to give real-time feedback that sticks.
wjessup
370
20k
Bioeconomy Workshop: Dr. Julius Ecuru, Opportunities for a Bioeconomy in West Africa
akademiya2063
PRO
1
150
Building Experiences: Design Systems, User Experience, and Full Site Editing
marktimemedia
0
540
Gemini Prompt Engineering: Practical Techniques for Tangible AI Outcomes
mfonobong
2
450
jQuery: Nuts, Bolts and Bling
dougneiner
66
8.5k
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
55
3.4k
Transcript
LEARNING TO BUILD DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS THE HARD WAY @iconara NEW
and improved!
LEARNING TO BUILD DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS THE HARD WAY @iconara NEW
and improved!
speakerdeck.com/iconara
Theo / @iconara
chief architect at BURT
FAILURE embrace it
SCALE how hard can it be? let’s worry about that
later.
KNOW YOUR LIMITS who’s the largest customer you could sign?
what would happen if you did?
BALANCE “customer” is a really bad shard key, find something
that distributes evenly & uniformly
SCALE OUT, NOT UP bigger boxes aren’t going to save
you <
START WITH TWO OF EVERYTHING going from one to two
is the hardest, force yourself to solve the scaling problem up front
START WITH TWO OF EVERYTHING you’ll solve the scaling problem,
and need less overcapacity THREE
LIMITS we’ll probably never run out of memory
BACK PRESSURE what happens when the system is working at
full capacity? what happens next?
PRODUCTION = QA production is where the weird shit happens,
can you test production traffic without deploying to production? =
MONOLITHS running all the things on the same box is
really fast. what could ever go wrong? 1:4:9
DECOUPLE UNTIL IT BREAKS moving things to separate services means
that you will be able to scale them independently
PROCESSING & STORAGE separate processing from storage, they almost never
scale together.
SCALE exponential scaling is also scaling, but you want it
as cheaply as possible
SCALE your CFO may not agree that O(2n) = O(n)
GÖTEBORG, DISTRIBUTED @gbgdistr meetup.com/gbgdistributed
KTHXBAI @iconara github.com/iconara architecturalatrocities.com burtcorp.com