Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
[Journal club] PHyCLIP: ðð-Product of Hyperboli...
Search
Semantic Machine Intelligence Lab., Keio Univ.
PRO
May 27, 2026
Technology
110
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
[Journal club] PHyCLIP: ðð-Product of Hyperbolic Factors Unifies Hierarchy and Compositionality in Vision-Language Representation Learning
Semantic Machine Intelligence Lab., Keio Univ.
PRO
May 27, 2026
More Decks by Semantic Machine Intelligence Lab., Keio Univ.
See All by Semantic Machine Intelligence Lab., Keio Univ.
[RSJ26] Building a VLA Model Based on Self-Distilled Classification
keio_smilab
PRO
0
190
[RSJ26] AnoleVLA: Lightweight Vision-Language-Action Model with Deep State Space Models for Mobile Manipulation
keio_smilab
PRO
0
130
[RSJ26] NarrativeFlow: Flow-Based Vision-Language-Action Model Using Robot Velocity Fields
keio_smilab
PRO
0
160
[RSJ26] Flow as Flow: Modeling Robot Velocity Fields as Probability Velocity Fields
keio_smilab
PRO
0
200
[RSJ26] Hierarchy-Aware Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Embodied Question Answering
keio_smilab
PRO
1
180
[MIRU26] Open-Vocabulary Intention-Guided Object Detection in Diverse Scenes
keio_smilab
PRO
0
200
[Journal club] Evo-1: Lightweight Vision-Language-Action Model with Preserved Semantic Alignment
keio_smilab
PRO
0
48
[MIRU26] To What Extent Does MLLM-as-a-Judge Exhibit Cross-Model Preference Bias?
keio_smilab
PRO
0
290
[Journal club] FlashVID: Efficient Video Large Language Models via Training-free Tree-based Spatiotemporal Token Merging
keio_smilab
PRO
0
36
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
enechainã®å 補ã»ã«ããµãŒãã¹ãã©ãããã©ãŒã
hiyosi
0
120
ããã©ãŠãµãã¢ãããªã®ç¶ç¶çãããã©ãŒãã³ã¹ã¢ãã¿ãªã³ã¯ã (åº) / Continuous Browser Application Performance Monitoring; Act 1
moznion
0
110
Androidã§HDRã¡ãã£ã¢ããå£ããã«ãæ±ã
chigichan24
0
410
#jawssonic2026 ãã®æä»£ãæªãã£ã ~åããªãã£ãSageMakerãšå ±ã«è¿ããã€ãã³ãåœæ¥~
ktkn1129
0
130
Jetpack Compose ã§æãæ°èçŽé¢UI â è€åãžã§ã¹ãã£ãŒã»ããªãŽã³èšäºé åã»é©å¿çããŒãžæ§æãšãã3ã€ã®å£/droidkaigi2026
nikkei_engineer_recruiting
0
230
DINO-EdgeQuery:Edge-First Polygon Decoding for Building Footprint Extraction from Satellite Imagery
lehupa
0
150
module Synths; end
asonas
1
120
SigmaãŠãŒã¶ãŒã®ããã®æçšãªãœãŒã¹äžæå ¬é & Sigmaã§äœ¿ããMCP #sigma_ucj /useful-resources-for-sigma-computing-users-and-mcps-with-sigma
shinyaa31
0
130
Microsoft 365 Copilot chat -tekoÀlypalvelun tietosuojaongelmat
hponka
0
430
ããã«äŒãããããæ°åãšã³ãžãã¢ã®æè²ã®ããã®ãã©ã€ãããã«æŽ»çšã®äžäŸ
ikedon
1
210
Azure Cost Management ã® FOCUS ã³ã¹ãããŒã¿ãè¿·ããèªãããã®â3ã€ã®è»žâ
tetsuyaooooo
0
150
å€å±€é²åŸ¡ãšæâŒ©æš©éã§å®çŸãããå®å šãªAIãšãŒãžã§ã³ãèšèšãã¿ãŒã³
lycorptech_jp
PRO
0
200
Featured
See All Featured
Save Time (by Creating Custom Rails Generators)
garrettdimon
PRO
32
4.6k
How to build a perfect <img>
jonoalderson
1
6k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
254
26k
Navigating Weather and Climate Data
rabernat
0
510
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
96
7.2k
äžçã®äººæ°ã¢ããª100åãåæããŠèŠãããã€ãŠã©ãŒã«èšèšã®å¿åŸ
akihiro_kokubo
PRO
74
42k
Practical Tips for Bootstrapping Information Extraction Pipelines
honnibal
25
2.1k
æè¡éžå®ã®å¯©çŸçŒïŒ2025幎çïŒ / Understanding the Spiral of Technologies 2025 edition
twada
PRO
120
120k
Why Your Marketing Sucks and What You Can Do About It - Sophie Logan
marketingsoph
0
400
AI Search: Implications for SEO and How to Move Forward - #ShenzhenSEOConference
aleyda
1
1.4k
B2B Lead Gen: Tactics, Traps & Triumph
marketingsoph
0
230
Conquering PDFs: document understanding beyond plain text
inesmontani
PRO
4
3k
Transcript
PHyCLIP: ðð -Product of Hyperbolic Factors Unifies Hierarchy and Compositionality
in Vision- Language Representation Learning ICLR26 æ ¶æçŸ©å¡Ÿå€§åŠ ææµŠåæç 究宀 é«ç§æå² Daiki Yoshikawa1, Takashi Matsubara1, 2 1Hokkaido University, 2CyberAgent Daiki Yoshikawa, et al. PHyCLIP: ðð -Product of Hyperbolic Factors Unifies Hierarchy and Compositionality in Vision-Language Representation Learning. ICLR2026.
2 PHyCLIP: éå±€æ§ãšæ§ææ§ãèæ ®ããåæ²ç©ºéãžã®åãèŸŒã¿ â« èæ¯ â« VLM 㯠éå±€æ§ (hierarchy)
ãš æ§ææ§ (compositionality) ã®äž¡æ¹ãæ±ã â« CLIP [Radford+, ICML21] ã¯åäžãŠãŒã¯ãªãã空éãžã®åã蟌㿠â hierarchy ãš compositionality ãåæã«è¡šçŸããããšãé£ãã â« åæ²ç©ºé㯠hierarchy ã®è¡šçŸã«é©ããäžæ¹, compositionality ã衚çŸãã«ãã â« ææ¡ææ³: PHyCLIP â« è€æ°ã® hyperbolic factor ã® ð1 -product 空éãžã®åãèŸŒã¿ â« è€æ° factor ã®åææŽ»æ§åã«ãã compositionality ãè¡šçŸ â« çµæ â« zero-shot ã® classification / retrieval ã§æ¢åææ³ãäžåã â« hierarchy ã®è¡šçŸã compositionality ã®çè§£ãæ¹å æŠèŠ â¢ â¢ â¢ â¢
3 éå±€æ§ãšæ§ææ§ãåæã«è¡šçŸããããšã¯é£ãã VLMãæ±ãã¹ã2çš®é¡ã®æå³æ§é â« éå±€æ§ (hierarchy) â« èšèªæŠå¿µã¯æšæ§é çã«åé¡ã§ãã (e.g., WordNet
[Miller, 95]) â« äŸ: dog ⪯ mammal ⪯ animal â« äžäœã®æŠå¿µã»ã©å ·äœç â« æ§ææ§ (compositionality) â« äŸ: âa dog in a carâ â« ç»åãæç« ã¯è€æ°æŠå¿µã®å ±èµ· CLIP [Radford+, ICML21] ã¯åäžã®ãŠãŒã¯ãªãã空éäžã®ïŒã€ã®ãã¯ãã«ãšããŠè¡šçŸ ï hierarchy ãš compositionality ãåäžç©ºéã§åæã«è¡šçŸã§ããªã èæ¯ (1/3) ⢠⢠⢠â¢
4 åæ²ç©ºé㯠hierarchy ãèªç¶ã«è¡šçŸã§ãã Poincaré Embeddings [Nickel+, NeurIPS17] â« èæ¯
â« åèªã»ã°ã©ãã«ã¯æœåšç㪠hierarchy ãååš â« äœæ¬¡å ã®ãŠãŒã¯ãªãã空éã§ã¯æ·±ãéå±€æ§é ã 衚ããªã (âµ âð: å€é åŒç éå±€æ§é : ææ°é¢æ°ç) â« ææ¡: ãã¢ã³ã«ã¬ã¢ãã«ãžã®åãèŸŒã¿ â« åæ²ç©ºéã§ã¯ç©ºéãææ°é¢æ°çã«åºãã â é£ç¶çãªæšæ§é ãšããŠéå±€æ§é ãèªç¶ã«è¡šçŸ â« ãã«ã ð ãéå±€, è·é¢ ð ð, ð ãé¡äŒŒåºŠã衚ã â« çµæ â« WordNet [Miller, 95] ã®ãããªå€§èŠæš¡åé¡äœç³»ã®åã蟌㿠⺠衚çŸå®¹éã»æ±åæ§èœãšãã«åŸæ¥ææ³ãåé§ âº ç¹ã«äœæ¬¡å ã§ãé«ã粟床ãç¶æ èæ¯ (2/3) ⢠⢠⢠⢠WordNet ã®åºä¹³é¡ subtree ãåæ²ç©ºé (ð = 2) ã§èšç·Ž
5 â« ç»åã»æç« ã¯è€æ°æŠå¿µã®å ±èµ·ãšããŠè¡šãã â« âa dog in a carâ â
{dog, car} â« âa cat and a bikeâ â {cat, bike} ï è€æ°æŠå¿µã®å ±èµ·ã hierarchy ã衚ãåäžã®åæ²ç©ºéã§è¡šçŸã§ããªã â« ããŒã«ä»£æ°ãšããŠã®è§£é â« atomic concepts: ð¶ = {ð1 , ð2 , ⊠, ðð } â« è€åæŠå¿µ: ð â ð¶ â« å atomic concept ãå«ãŸãããã©ãã bit ã§æãã â è€åæŠå¿µ ð, ð ã®è·é¢ã¯ããã³ã°è·é¢ ðð -product (ååæ²ç©ºéã®è·é¢ã®å) Compositionality 㯠Boolean-like ãªæ§é ãæã€ èæ¯ (3/3) ⢠⢠⢠⢠ð¶ = {dog, cat, car, bike} ð = {dog, car}, ð = {dog} ð ð = 1,0,1,0 ð ð = 1,0,0,0 ããã³ã°è·é¢: ðHam ð ð , ð ð = 1 ðð -product: ð1 ð, ð = à· ð=1 ð ð âð ð ð¥ ð , ðŠ ð
6 Vision-Language Representation Learning â¢ â¢ â¢ â¢ ææ³ æŠèŠ
ç¹åŸŽ CLIP [Radford+, ICML21] ç»åã»ããã¹ããåäžã®ãŠãŒã¯ãªã ã空éãžåå ï hierarchy ã compositionality ãæç€ºçã« æ±ããªã MERU [Desai+, ICML23] CLIP ã®åã蟌ã¿ç©ºéãåæ²ç©ºéãž æ¡åŒµ ⺠hierarchy ã®æšæ§é ãè¡šçŸ ï compositionality ã¯èæ ®ããŠããªã HyCoCLIP [Pal+, ICLR25] bounding box supervision ãå°å ¥ hyperbolic entailment cone ãå°å ¥ ⺠object-level ã® hierarchy ãæç€ºçã«åŠç¿ ï compositionality ã®æ±ãã¯éå®ç é¢é£ç ç©¶ MERU HyCoCLIP
7 PHyCLIP ã®å šäœå â« è€æ°ã® hyperbolic factor ã®ç©ºéãžåã蟌ã â« ð
åã® ð æ¬¡å åæ²ç©ºé âð ð â å šäœã§ ðð æ¬¡å ææ¡ææ³ (1/3) ⢠⢠⢠â¢
8 ç»åã»ããã¹ããåæ²ç©ºéãžåã蟌ã â« åæ²ç©ºéãžã®åã蟌㿠⫠ðð æ¬¡å ç¹åŸŽéã ð åã«åå² â«
åå²ãã ð ð ãåæ²ç©ºéã«åå ð ð â âð â ð ð â âð ð â« è·é¢ã®å®çŸ© (ðð -product metric) ð1 ð¿, ð = à· ð=1 ð ð âð ð ð(ð), ð(ð) ðavg ð¿, ð = 1 ð ð1 ð¿, ð â« object-level ã«ã¯ãããããç»åã»ããã¹ããäœ¿çš â« å ¥å: ð°, ð», ð°box, ð»box â« image 㯠text ããå ·äœç â« å ã® image/text ã¯ã¯ãããããããã®ããå ·äœç ææ¡ææ³ (2/3) ⢠⢠⢠⢠Entailment Relation ð° ⪯ ð» ð°box ⪯ ð»box ð° ⪯ ð°box ð» ⪯ ð»box
9 Loss function: 察å¿é¢ä¿ãšéå±€é¢ä¿ãåæã«åŠç¿ æå€±é¢æ°: âoverall = âcont + ðŸâent
ææ¡ææ³ (3/3) ⢠⢠⢠⢠Contrastive Loss â« æšæºç㪠InfoNCE âcont {ð¿ð }, {ðð } = â à· ðâðµ log exp âðavg ð¿ð , ðð /ð Ï ðâðµ exp âðavg ð¿ð , ðð /ð â« ãã¹ãŠã®ãã¢ã§å¹³å âcont = 1 4 ൬ ൰ âcont {ð°ð }, {ð»ð } + âcont {ð»ð }, {ð°ð } + âcont {ð°ð box}, {ð»ð box} + âcont {ð»ð box}, {ð°ð box} Entailment Loss â« entailment cone ã§é åºé¢ä¿ã衚ã ð ð â ð¶ ð ð ⺠ð ð ⪯ ð ð â« entailment cone ããå€ããã眰å âent, ð ð¿, ð = max 0, ð ð ð , ð ð â ðð ð ð âent ð¿, ð = 1 ð à· ð=1 ð âent, ð ð¿, ð ð ð ð , ð ð : y ãã x ã®è§åºŠ ð ð ð : cone ã®åéå£è§ ð: ããŒãžã³
10 GRIT ãçšããåŠç¿ â« èšç·ŽããŒã¿ã»ãã â« GRIT [Peng+, ICCV23]: èªåã¢ãããŒã·ã§ã³ããã
image-text ã㢠+ bbox â« 14.0M image-text pairs / 26.6M box annotations â« PHyCLIP ã®èšå® â« ð = 64, ð = 8 (åèš: 512次å ) â« ðŸ = 0.2 â« optimizer: AdamW â« å®éšç°å¢ â« GPU: A100 Ã4 â« iterations: 500,000 â« batch size: 768 å®éšèšå® ⢠⢠⢠â¢
11 â« Zero-shot Image Classification ⺠PHyCLIP ã¯å šäœãéããŠæ¢åææ³ãäžåã (specialized ã¯
GRIT ã®ååžå€) ⺠ç¹ã« General ã§é«ãã¹ã³ã¢ â è€æ°ã®åæ²ç©ºéã«ãã concept families ã®çè§£ãæå¹ PHyCLIP ã¯ç»ååé¡ã¿ã¹ã¯ã§æ¢åææ³ãäžåã å®éççµæ (1/3) ⢠⢠⢠â¢
12 PHyCLIP 㯠retrieval ãšéå±€åé¡ã§æ¢åææ³ãäžåã â« Zero-shot Retrieval & Hierarchical
Classification ⺠PHyCLIP ã¯ã»ãšãã©ã® retrieval ææšã§æ¢åææ³ãäžåã ⺠Hierarchical Classification (äºæž¬ã©ãã«ãš GT ãã©ãã ã WordNet äžã§è¿ãã) ã® å šãŠã®ææšã§æ¢åææ³ãäžåã å®éççµæ (2/3) ⢠⢠⢠â¢
13 PHyCLIP 㯠compositionality ã®çè§£ãæ¹å â« Compositional Understanding â« ãã£ãã·ã§ã³ã®äžéšã倿Žãã
hard negative ãã GT ã®ãã£ãã·ã§ã³ãèå¥ â« VL-CheckList-Object: ãã£ãã·ã§ã³äžã®ç©äœãå¥ã®ç©äœã«çœ®æ â« SugarCrepe: object/attribute/relation ã«å¯Ÿã㊠replace/swap/add ⺠VL-CheckList-Object ã§ã¯å šãŠã®ãµãã»ããã§ PHyCLIP ãæ¢åææ³ãäžåã â äœçœ®ã倧ããã«é å¥ã«ç©äœã®ååšãè¡šçŸ ï relation replacement ã object swapping ã§ã¯æ§èœãäœäž â Boolean-like ãªèšèšã«ããç©äœå士ã®é¢ä¿æ§ã®çè§£ã«åŒ±ã å®éççµæ (3/3) ⢠⢠⢠â¢
14 â« ç»åã®ãã«ã ã¯ããã¹ãã®ãã«ã ãã倧ããçãç¯å²ã«éäž (âµ ç»åã¯ããã¹ãããå ·äœç: ð°ð ⪯ ð»ð ) â«
åã ã® factor å ã§ã¯ããããã®ãã«ã ã®ååžãéãªãåºã忣 ⺠PHyCLIP ã¯åã蟌ã¿ç©ºéã®åºãé åãæŽ»çš åã ã® factor ã§åã蟌ã¿ç©ºéãæå¹æŽ»çš 宿§ççµæ (1/2) ⢠⢠⢠â¢
15 â« dog 㯠â39 ð , car 㯠â9
ð 㧠掻æ§å â« dog and car ã§ã¯åæã«æŽ» æ§å â« â39 ð ã§ã¯åºä¹³é¡, â9 ð ã§ã¯ä¹ãç©/æ¥çšå ã®éå±€æ§é ãçŸãã å hyperbolic factor ã¯æŠå¿µããšã® hierarchy ã衚ã 宿§ççµæ (2/2) ⢠⢠⢠â¢
18 PHyCLIP: éå±€æ§ãšæ§ææ§ãèæ ®ããåæ²ç©ºéãžã®åãèŸŒã¿ â« èæ¯ â« VLM 㯠éå±€æ§ (hierarchy)
ãš æ§ææ§ (compositionality) ã®äž¡æ¹ãæ±ã â« CLIP [Radford+, ICML21] ã¯åäžãŠãŒã¯ãªãã空éãžã®åã蟌㿠â hierarchy ãš compositionality ãåæã«è¡šçŸããããšãé£ãã â« åæ²ç©ºé㯠hierarchy ã®è¡šçŸã«é©ããäžæ¹, compositionality ã衚çŸãã«ãã â« ææ¡ææ³: PHyCLIP â« è€æ°ã® hyperbolic factor ã® ð1 -product 空éãžã®åãèŸŒã¿ â« è€æ° factor ã®åææŽ»æ§åã«ãã compositionality ãè¡šçŸ â« çµæ â« zero-shot ã® classification / retrieval ã§æ¢åææ³ãäžåã â« hierarchy ã®è¡šçŸã compositionality ã®çè§£ãæ¹å ãŸãšã ⢠⢠⢠â¢
19 Poincaré Embeddings [Nickel+, NeurIPS17] ã®è©³çް â« Poincaré ã¢ãã« â«
Riemannian metric tensor ðð¥ = 2 1â ð 2 2 ððž (ððž : Euclidean metric tensor) â« ç¹ ð¢, ð£ â â¬ð¹ éã®è·é¢ ð ð, ð = arcosh 1 + 2 ð â ð 2 1 â ð 2 1 â ð 2 â« Optimization ðœð¡+1 â ðððð ðœð¡ â ðð¡ 1 â ðœð¡ 2 2 4 âðž â« Loss â Î = à· ð¢,ð£ âð log ðâð ð,ð Ï ðâ²âð© ð¢ ðâð ð,ðâ² Appendix (1/4) ⢠⢠⢠â¢
20 PHyCLIP ã®å®è£ 詳现 Appendix (2/4) ⢠⢠⢠⢠PHyCLIP
㯠Lorents model [Nickel+, ICML18] ã§ hyperbolic factor ãå®è£ (æ²ç âð¶ð 㯠learnable) â« Minkowski inner product: æéæ¹åã®ã¿è² ã®å ç© à· ð = ð¥0 , ð¥1 , ⊠, ð¥ð , ð = ð¥1 , ⊠, ð¥ð â âð à· ð, à· ð âð,1 = âð¥0 ðŠ0 + ð, ð âð â« åæ²ç©ºéãåæ²é¢ãšããŠè¡šçŸ ððŒ ð = à· ð â âð,1 à· ð, à· ð âð,1 = âðŒâ1, ð¥0 > 0 â« Lorentz distance ð ððŒ ð à· ð, à· ð = ðŒâ1/2 arccosh âðŒ à· ð, à· ð âð,1 â« Exponential map: ð ãåæ²ç©ºéäžã®ç¹ãžåå à· ð = expà· ðš ðŒ ð = cosh ðŒ ð à· ð + sinh ðŒ ð ðŒ ð ð â« Entailment Cones in the Lorents Model ð ð = sinâ1 min 1, 2ðŸ ðŒ ð âð ð ð, ð = cosâ1 ð¥0 + ðŒ ð, ð âðŒ ð ðŠ0 ð âð ðŒ ð, ð âðŒ ð 2 â 1
21 Ablation Study Appendix (3/4) ⢠⢠⢠â¢
22 Additional Visualizations Appendix (4/4) ⢠⢠⢠â¢